| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 45 | 2832 | 699 | 102 | 7969 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Roderick K. Clayton between 1953 and 2007, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roderick K. Clayton published across 55 years, from 1953 to 2007, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1972. 2 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.
142 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 3 |
| 1954 | 0 |
| 1955 | 3 |
| 1956 | 0 |
| 1957 | 4 |
| 1958 | 2 |
| 1959 | 6 |
| 1960 | 7 |
| 1961 | 2 |
| 1962 | 10 |
| 1963 | 5 |
| 1964 | 4 |
| 1965 | 5 |
| 1966 | 9 |
| 1967 | 2 |
| 1968 | 3 |
| 1969 | 6 |
| 1970 | 3 |
| 1971 | 2 |
| 1972 | 13 |
| 1973 | 6 |
| 1974 | 6 |
| 1975 | 3 |
| 1976 | 3 |
| 1977 | 6 |
| 1978 | 8 |
| 1979 | 9 |
| 1980 | 5 |
| 1981 | 3 |
| 1982 | 0 |
| 1983 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 0 |
| 1987 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0 |
| 1991 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 1 |
| Total | 142 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick K. Clayton sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 102 publications — 26th percentile
26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | 102 |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick K. Clayton sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile
57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | 45 |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Roderick K. Clayton;William R. Sistrom
Susan C. Straley;William W. Parson;David C. Mauzerall;Roderick K. Clayton
Colin A. Wraight;Roderick K. Clayton
Dan W. Reed;Roderick K. Clayton
William W. Parson;Roderick K. Clayton;Richard J. Cogdell;Richard J. Cogdell
Unknown
Roderick K. Clayton;Richard T. Wang
A. Vermeglio;R.K. Clayton
Roderick K. Clayton;Betty J. Clayton
Unknown
William Arnold;Roderick K. Clayton
Roderick K. Clayton
Andre Vermeglio;Roderick K. Clayton
Kenneth L. Zankel;Dan W. Reed;Roderick K. Clayton
Roderick K. Clayton;Betty J. Clayton
Unknown
Richard J. Cogdell;Daniel C. Brune;Roderick K. Clayton
Unknown
Roderick Keener Clayton
Roderick K. Clayton;Robert Haselkorn
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.