World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
80
Citations
27260
World Ranking
1570
National Ranking
729

Robert M. Stephens publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Stephens sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 169 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Robert M. Stephens D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Stephens sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Stephens is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on molecular biology, cell biology, cancer research, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and oncology.

The scientist's work covers several core topics including microtubule and mitosis dynamics, bioinformatics and genomic networks, FOXO transcription factor regulation, RNA research and splicing, protein kinase regulation and GTPase signaling, PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer, and cancer-related molecular mechanisms research.

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Robert M. Stephens has coauthored publications with Ming Yi, Dwight V. Nissley, Frank McCormick, Andrew C. Nelson, and Thomas J. Turbyville.

Their research has been published in venues such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Molecular Cancer Research, and McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks.

Significant publications include the following:

  • ssGSEA score-based Ras dependency indexes derived from gene expression data reveal potential Ras addiction mechanisms with possible clinical implications, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • RAS internal tandem duplication disrupts GTPase-activating protein (GAP) binding to activate oncogenic signaling, 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Abstract B051: IFNL4-deltaG allele is associated with an interferon signature in tumors and survival of African-American men with prostate cancer, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Abstract B03: Biologic and biochemical interactions of NF1 GAP on KRAS G13x mutations, 2020, Molecular Cancer Research
  • Index, 2024, McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks

Best Publications

  • Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis

    Nozomu Yanaihara;Natasha Caplen;Elise Bowman;Masahiro Seike

  • DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists

    Da Wei Huang;Brad T. Sherman;Qina Tan;Joseph Kir

  • DAVID-WS

    Xiaoli Jiao;Brad T. Sherman;Da Wei Huang;Robert Stephens

  • Genomic profiling of microRNA and messenger RNA reveals deregulated microRNA expression in prostate cancer.

    Stefan Ambs;Robyn L. Prueitt;Ming Yi;Robert S. Hudson

  • Trk receptors use redundant signal transduction pathways involving SHC and PLC-γ1 to mediate NGF responses

    Robert M. Stephens;David M. Loeb;Terry D. Copeland;Tony Pawson

  • Tumor Immunobiological Differences in Prostate Cancer between African-American and European-American Men

    Tiffany A. Wallace;Robyn L. Prueitt;Ming Yi;Tiffany M. Howe

  • DAVID Knowledgebase: a gene-centered database integrating heterogeneous gene annotation resources to facilitate high-throughput gene functional analysis

    Brad T. Sherman;Da Wei Huang;Qina Tan;Yongjian Guo

  • RTCGD: retroviral tagged cancer gene database.

    Keiko Akagi;Takeshi Suzuki;Robert M. Stephens;Nancy A. Jenkins

  • bioDBnet: the biological database network

    Uma Mudunuri;Anney Che;Ming Yi;Robert M. Stephens

  • Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID.

    Da Wei Huang;Brad T. Sherman;Xin Zheng;Jun Yang

  • MYC-driven accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate is associated with breast cancer prognosis

    Atsushi Terunuma;Nagireddy Putluri;Prachi Mishra;Ewy A. Mathé

  • Initial sequence and comparative analysis of the cat genome

    Joan U. Pontius;James C. Mullikin;Douglas R. Smith;Agencourt Sequencing Team

  • Gene expression profiling of substantia nigra dopamine neurons: further insights into Parkinson's disease pathology

    Filip Simunovic;Ming Yi;Yulei Wang;Laurel Macey

  • High-Throughput GoMiner, an 'industrial-strength' integrative gene ontology tool for interpretation of multiple-microarray experiments, with application to studies of Common Variable Immune Deficiency (CVID)

    Barry R. Zeeberg;Haiying Qin;Sudarshan Narasimhan;Margot Sunshine

  • MiR-1 and miR-200 inhibit EMT via Slug -dependent and tumorigenesis via Slug -independent mechanisms

    Y. N. Liu;J. J. Yin;W. Abou-Kheir;P. G. Hynes

  • Equine infectious anemia virus gag and pol genes: relatedness to visna and AIDS virus.

    Robert M. Stephens;James W. Casey;Nancy R. Rice

  • Genetic loci associated with delayed clearance of Plasmodium falciparum following artemisinin treatment in Southeast Asia

    Shannon Takala-Harrison;Taane G Clark;Christopher G Jacob;Michael P Cummings

  • Human Glioma Growth is Controlled by MicroRNA-10b

    Galina Gabriely;Ming Yi;Ravi S. Narayan;Johanna M. Niers

  • Downregulated MicroRNA-200a in Meningiomas Promotes Tumor Growth by Reducing E-Cadherin and Activating the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

    Okay Saydam;Yiping Shen;Thomas Würdinger;Thomas Würdinger;Ozlem Senol

  • The Cytoplasmic and Transmembrane Domains of the p75 and Trk A Receptors Regulate High Affinity Binding to Nerve Growth Factor

    Darren Esposito;Pulin Patel;Robert M. Stephens;Pilar Perez

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. O'Brien
Stephen J. O'Brien Nova Southeastern University
Richard A. Lempicki
Richard A. Lempicki National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Frank McCormick
Frank McCormick University of California, San Francisco
Raymond V. Gilden
Raymond V. Gilden National Institutes of Health
H. Clifford Lane
H. Clifford Lane National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Carlo M. Croce
Carlo M. Croce The Ohio State University
Anna M. Krichevsky
Anna M. Krichevsky Brigham and Women's Hospital
Timothy D. Veenstra
Timothy D. Veenstra Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine
Alejandro A. Schäffer
Alejandro A. Schäffer National Institutes of Health
Michael Baseler
Michael Baseler Leidos (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying genetics in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career paths. For those looking to enter healthcare admin roles, programs from accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid offer an accessible starting point. These programs help students quickly gain practical skills while benefiting from flexible learning and financial support.

If you want to finish your degree sooner and advance your genetics career quickly, consider enrolling in accelerated degree programs. These fast-track options are ideal for motivated students who thrive in intensive, focused environments.

Many learners prefer a flexible pace. Self paced degrees let you tailor your studies around existing commitments, making it easier to balance work, life, and education.

Finally, those seeking a cost-effective path should explore no application fee colleges. Eliminating application fees can reduce upfront costs, making it even easier to start your educational journey in genetics and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Stephens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles