World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
107
Citations
38708
World Ranking
1111
National Ranking
666

Robert J Collier publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J Collier sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 403 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Robert J Collier D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J Collier sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J Collier is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily spans areas in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions also in immunology and microbiology, and medicine. The scientific work focuses on several interconnected subfields including molecular biology, immunology, physiology, microbiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's scholarly output covers diverse topics, prominently including:

  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
  • Immunotherapy and immune responses
  • Pain mechanisms and treatments
  • Antimicrobial peptides and activities
  • T-cell and B-cell immunology
  • Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study

Frequently publishing in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Neuroscience, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, their recent papers include:

  • "Anthrax toxins regulate pain signaling and can deliver molecular cargoes into ANTXR2+ DRG sensory neurons," 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • "An in vivo selection-derived d-peptide for engineering erythrocyte-binding antigens that promote immune tolerance," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Anthrax Toxin as a Molecular Platform to Target Nociceptive Neurons and Modulate Pain," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Erythrocyte-targeted immunomodulatory antigens enabled by in vivo selection of D-peptides," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Robert J Collier has collaborated regularly with several researchers, highlighting a close network of scientific partnership. Frequent coauthors include Bradley L. Pentelute, Nicole Yang, Jörg Isensee, Dylan V. Neel, and Sai Liu, each having contributed to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Identification of the cellular receptor for anthrax toxin.

    K A Bradley;J Mogridge;J Mogridge;M Mourez;R J Collier

  • Crystal structure of the anthrax toxin protective antigen.

    C Petosa;R.J Collier;K.R Klimpel;S.H Leppla

  • Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production.

    David Renaudeau;Anne Collin;S. Yahav;V. de Basilio

  • Major Advances Associated with Environmental Effects on Dairy Cattle

    R.J. Collier;G.E. Dahl;M.J. VanBaale

  • Effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on lactating Holstein cows: I. Production, metabolism, and aspects of circulating somatotropin

    M. L. Rhoads;R. P. Rhoads;M. J. VanBaale;R. J. Collier

  • Potential nutritional strategies for intensively managed cattle during thermal stress

    D.K. Beede;R. J. Collier

  • Diphtheria toxin: mode of action and structure.

    R J Collier

  • Structure of exotoxin A of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 3.0-Angstrom resolution.

    V S Allured;R J Collier;S F Carroll;D B McKay

  • Crystal structure of the zeta isoform of the 14-3-3 protein.

    Dong Liu;J. Bienkowska;C. Petosa;R. J. Collier

  • Influences of environment and its modification on dairy animal health and production.

    R.J. Collier;D.K. Beede;W.W. Thatcher;L.A. Israel

  • Anthrax protective antigen forms oligomers during intoxication of mammalian cells.

    J C Milne;D Furlong;P C Hanna;J S Wall

  • Crystal structure of the anthrax lethal factor

    AD Pannifer;TY Wong;Robert Schwarzenbacher;M Renatus

  • Invited review: genes involved in the bovine heat stress response.

    R.J. Collier;J.L. Collier;R.P. Rhoads;L.H. Baumgard

  • The effect of breed, parity, and stage of lactation on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk fat from dairy cows.

    J.A. Kelsey;B.A. Corl;R.J. Collier;D.E. Bauman

  • Effects of Heat Stress during Pregnancy on Maternal Hormone Concentrations, Calf Birth Weight and Postpartum Milk Yield of Holstein Cows

    R. J. Collier;S. G. Doelger;H. H. Head;W. W. Thatcher

  • Structure and Activity of Diphtheria Toxin I. THIOL-DEPENDENT DISSOCIATION OF A FRACTION OF TOXIN INTO ENZYMICALLY ACTIVE AND INACTIVE FRAGMENTS

    R. J. Collier;Judith Kandel

  • On the role of macrophages in anthrax.

    P C Hanna;D Acosta;D Acosta;R J Collier

  • Understanding the mode of action of diphtheria toxin: a perspective on progress during the 20th century

    R.J Collier

  • Nucleotide sequence of the structural gene for diphtheria toxin carried by corynebacteriophage beta.

    L Greenfield;M J Bjorn;G Horn;D Fong

  • Effects of climatic and management factors on conception rate of dairy cattle in subtropical environment.

    L. Badinga;R.J. Collier;W.W. Thatcher;C.J. Wilcox

Frequent Co-Authors

Dale E. Bauman
Dale E. Bauman Cornell University
C.J. Wilcox
C.J. Wilcox University of Florida
William W. Thatcher
William W. Thatcher University of Florida
Lance H. Baumgard
Lance H. Baumgard Iowa State University
H.H. Head
H.H. Head University of Florida
Fuller W. Bazer
Fuller W. Bazer Texas A&M University
Joseph T. Barbieri
Joseph T. Barbieri Medical College of Wisconsin
D.K. Beede
D.K. Beede Michigan State University
John J. Mekalanos
John J. Mekalanos Harvard Medical School
Philip C. Hanna
Philip C. Hanna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of rewarding healthcare and science careers. Many students start with foundational degrees, such as a bs in biology online. These flexible programs let you quickly build expertise, making it easier to pursue jobs in research, pharmaceuticals, or further study.

For those looking to enter the workforce sooner, medical assistant programs are a popular stepping stone. They equip you with hands-on skills and are often eligible for financial aid. After becoming a medical assistant, career growth is possible—many choose cma to lpn pathways, which help you advance from a certified medical assistant to a Licensed Practical Nurse.

Another in-demand option is starting with online associate rn programs. These accelerated programs prepare you for RN licensure and provide a solid clinical foundation. Whichever path you choose, online degrees offer flexibility and a streamlined route to career advancement in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J Collier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles