World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
31
Citations
3619
World Ranking
8241
National Ranking
644

Rieks D. van Klinken publications per year

1990: 1 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
1990 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

Rieks D. van Klinken publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rieks D. van Klinken sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 123 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Rieks D. van Klinken D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rieks D. van Klinken sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rieks D. van Klinken is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with particular expertise in Insect Science, Plant Science, and Ecology. Additional subfields include Marketing and Food Science, highlighting a broad interdisciplinary approach to their work.

The scientist's body of work includes several recent papers, showcasing engagement with contemporary issues in food systems, consumer behavior, and pest management. Notable publications include:

  • "Consumers' perspectives on antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance in food animals: a systematic review" (2025) published in npj Science of Food
  • "A menu of measures to manage trade-related plant pest risks, and a review of methods for demonstrating measure efficacy" (2022) in Biological Invasions
  • "Consumer Trust in Food and the Food System: A Critical Review" (2021) in Foods
  • "An integrative model to understand consumers' trust and willingness to buy imported fresh fruit in urban China" (2021) in British Food Journal
  • "Species identification, phylogenetic analysis and detection of herbicide-resistant biotypes of Amaranthus based on ALS and ITS" (2020) in Scientific Reports

Rieks D. van Klinken collaborates frequently with a core group of researchers, which includes:

  • Airong Zhang
  • Matthew P. Hill
  • Yingnan Joseph Zhou
  • Junxiu Wang
  • L. Kingham

Their frequent publication venues reflect a consistent contribution to journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Foods, British Food Journal, Scientific Reports, and Crop Protection. This range demonstrates interdisciplinary publication across entomology, food science, and agricultural research domains.

The scientist's main research topics focus on various aspects of insect science, particularly:

  • Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

Their work often intersects areas of environmental sustainability and food safety, highlighting a research agenda attentive to both ecological concerns and market dynamics. This is evident in papers addressing consumer trust in food systems and pesticide impacts on agriculture.

Best Publications

  • Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems

    R. G. Van Driesche;R. I. Carruthers;M. S. Hoddle

  • Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges

    John D. Parker;Mark E. Torchin;Ruth A. Hufbauer;Nathan P. Lemoine

  • Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plants

    A.W. Sheppard;R.D. van Klinken;T.A. Heard

  • Is host‐specificity of weed biological control agents likely to evolve rapidly following establishment?

    Rieks Dekker van Klinken;Owain Rhys Edwards

  • Considering the social dimension of invasive species: the case of buffel grass

    N.A. Marshall;M. Friedel;R.D. van Klinken;A.C. Grice

  • What are the key drivers of spread in invasive plants: dispersal, demography or landscape: and how can we use this knowledge to aid management?

    Shaun R. Coutts;Rieks D. van Klinken;Hiroyuki Yokomizo;Yvonne M. Buckley;Yvonne M. Buckley

  • Effects of clonal integration and light availability on the growth and physiology of two invasive herbs.

    Cheng‐Yuan Xu;Shon S. Schooler;Rieks D. Van Klinken

  • Maximising the contribution of native‐range studies towards the identification and prioritisation of weed biocontrol agents

    John A Goolsby;Rieks D van Klinken;William A Palmer

  • The Relative Importance of Genetic Diversity and Phenotypic Plasticity in Determining Invasion Success of a Clonal Weed in the USA and China

    Yupeng Geng;Yupeng Geng;Rieks D. van Klinken;Alejandro Sosa;Bo Li

  • A scientific approach to agent selection

    Rieks D van Klinken;S Raghu

  • Targeting biological control across diverse landscapes: the release, establishment, and early success of two insects on mesquite (Prosopis spp.) insects in Australian rangelands

    Rieks D van Klinken;Gio Fichera;Hugo Cordo

  • Phenotypic plasticity influences the size, shape and dynamics of the geographic distribution of an invasive plant.

    Jean-Baptiste Pichancourt;Rieks D. van Klinken

  • Predicting population dynamics of weed biological control agents: science or gazing into crystal balls?

    Myron P Zalucki;Rieks D van Klinken

  • Phenotypic divergence during the invasion of Phyla canescens in Australia and France: evidence for selection-driven evolution

    Cheng-Yuan Xu;Mic H. Julien;Mohammad Fatemi;Christophe Girod

  • Spatial and Temporal Rates and Patterns of Mesquite (Prosopis species) Invasion in Western Australia

    Unknown

  • Testing the discrimination and detection limits of WorldView-2 imagery on a challenging invasive plant target.

    T. P. Robinson;Grant Wardell-Johnson;Gabriella Pracilio;Chris Brown

  • Predicting the potential distribution of a riparian invasive plant: the effects of changing climate, flood regimes and land-use patterns.

    Justine V. Murray;Kate E. Stokes;Rieks D. van Klinken

  • Population Ecology of Hybrid Mesquite (Prosopis Species) in Western Australia: How Does it Differ from Native Range Invasions and What are the Implications for Impacts and Management?

    Rieks D. van Klinken;Jodi Graham;Lloyd K. Flack

  • Worth the risk? Introduction of legumes can cause more harm than good: an Australian perspective

    Q. Paynter;S. M. Csurhes;T. A. Heard;J. Ireson

  • Comparison of alternative strategies for invasive species distribution modeling

    Todd P. Robinson;Rieks D. van Klinken;Graciela Metternicht

  • Predicting invasions in Australia by a Neotropical shrub under climate change: the challenge of novel climates and parameter estimation

    Rieks D. van Klinken;Rieks D. van Klinken;Ben E. Lawson;Ben E. Lawson;Myron P. Zalucki

  • Intercontinental dispersal prior to human translocation revealed in a cryptogenic invasive tree.

    J. A. Hawkins;N. Boutaoui;K. Y. Cheung;R. D. Van Klinken

  • Buffel grass and climate change: a framework for projecting invasive species distributions when data are scarce

    Tara G. Martin;Helen Murphy;Adam C. Liedloff;Colette Thomas

  • Simple rules to contain an invasive species with a complex life cycle and high dispersal capacity.

    Jean‐Baptiste Pichancourt;Iadine Chadès;Jennifer Firn;Rieks D. van Klinken

Frequent Co-Authors

Cheng-Yuan Xu
Cheng-Yuan Xu Central Queensland University
Carl Smith
Carl Smith University of Łódź
Tara G. Martin
Tara G. Martin University of British Columbia
Clive McAlpine
Clive McAlpine University of Queensland
Yvonne M. Buckley
Yvonne M. Buckley Trinity College Dublin
Gimme H. Walter
Gimme H. Walter University of Queensland
Myron P. Zalucki
Myron P. Zalucki University of Queensland
Roderick J. Fensham
Roderick J. Fensham University of Queensland
Jennifer Firn
Jennifer Firn Queensland University of Technology
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career opportunities, especially when paired with the right complementary degrees. Many students pursue interdisciplinary paths, combining their science background with expertise in psychology or counseling. For those looking to accelerate their education, an accelerated master's in psychology can offer a fast track to advanced roles in research or applied settings.

Another option is an online masters in mental health counseling, which prepares graduates to support mental well-being in individuals and communities—a skill set often valued in environmental advocacy and education. Those interested in the intersection of science, law, and society may consider careers in forensic psychology where understanding human behavior is crucial in legal and conservation contexts.

For students passionate about supporting youth, pursuing an online masters child psychology degree can complement work in environmental education programs focused on children and adolescents. Each of these online opportunities offers flexibility, affordability, and unique skillsets that can enhance career prospects related to ecology, evolution, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Rieks D. van Klinken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles