World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
9288
World Ranking
5552
National Ranking
2630

Rebecca Lewthwaite publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Lewthwaite sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 69 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Rebecca Lewthwaite D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Lewthwaite sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rebecca Lewthwaite is affiliated with Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields including medicine, psychology, and neuroscience, with a particular focus on rehabilitation and motor performance.

The main subfields of their study include cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, orthopedics and sports medicine, and rehabilitation. Their work covers key topics such as sport psychology and performance, motivation and self-concept in sports, sports performance and training, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, balance, gait, and falls prevention, as well as musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation.

Several of Lewthwaite's recent papers include:

  • Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 2021, Psychological Bulletin
  • Translating Thoughts Into Action: Optimizing Motor Performance and Learning Through Brief Motivational and Attentional Influences, 2021, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Essential Role of Social Context and Self-Efficacy in Daily Paretic Arm/Hand Use After Stroke: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study With Accelerometry, 2022, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Choose your words wisely: Optimizing impacts on standardized performance testing, 2020, Gait & Posture
  • A Novel Combination of Accelerometry and Ecological Momentary Assessment for Post-Stroke Paretic Arm/Hand Use: Feasibility and Validity, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine

The publication venues where Lewthwaite frequently appears include:

  • Psychological Bulletin
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Gait & Posture

Frequent co-authors working alongside Lewthwaite are:

  • Gabriele Wulf
  • John Monterosso
  • Carolee J. Winstein
  • Beth E. Fisher
  • Lee-Kuen Chua

The body of work demonstrates a consistent interest in understanding and improving motor learning and rehabilitation outcomes through motivational, attentional, and contextual factors. Studies often integrate objective measures like accelerometry with ecological momentary assessment to capture real-world functional use and recovery patterns, especially relating to stroke and cerebral palsy populations.

Rebecca Lewthwaite's research portfolio reflects a multidisciplinary approach aimed at advancing knowledge in both clinical and performance domains, bridging gaps between psychological theory and physical rehabilitation.

Best Publications

  • Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning

    Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors.

    Gabriele Wulf;Charles Shea;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes

    Carolee J Winstein;Carolee J Winstein;Dorian K Rose;Sylvia M Tan;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning

    Rebecca Lewthwaite;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Suzete Chiviacowsky;Ricardo Drews;Gabriele Wulf

  • Social Psychological Aspects of Competition for Male Youth Sport Participants: IV. Predictors of Enjoyment

    Unknown

  • Effect of a Task-Oriented Rehabilitation Program on Upper Extremity Recovery Following Motor Stroke: The ICARE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Carolee J. Winstein;Steven L. Wolf;Alexander W. Dromerick;Christianne J. Lane

  • Effects of Physical Guidance and Knowledge of Results on Motor Learning: Support for the Guidance Hypothesis

    Carolee J. Winstein;Patricia S. Pohl;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease.

    Gabriele Wulf;Merrill Landers;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Thomas Töllner

  • Autonomy support enhances performance expectancies, positive affect, and motor learning

    Anielle Lemos;Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Suzete Chiviacowsky

  • Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning

    Rebecca Lewthwaite;Gabriele Wulf

  • Autonomy facilitates repeated maximum force productions.

    Takehiro Iwatsuki;Reza Abdollahipour;Rudolf Psotta;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Effortless motor learning?: An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency.

    Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Infusing Motor Learning Research Into Neurorehabilitation Practice: A Historical Perspective With Case Exemplar From the Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program

    Carolee Winstein;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Sarah R. Blanton;Lois B. Wolf

  • Social Psychological Aspects of Competition for Male Youth Sport Participants: I. Predictors of Competitive Stress

    Unknown

  • Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children

    Luciana T.G. Ávila;Suzete Chiviacowsky;Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Self-Controlled Learning: The Importance of Protecting Perceptions of Competence

    Suzete Chiviacowsky;Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults.

    Gabriele Wulf;Suzete Chiviacowsky;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Normative Feedback Effects on Learning a Timing Task

    Gabrielle Wulf;Suzete Chiviacowsky;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

    Lee-Kuen Chua;Judith Jimenez-Diaz;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Taewon Kim

  • Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease.

    Suzete Chiviacowsky;Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite;Tiago Campos

  • Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning

    Luigi A. M. Pascua;Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning

    Andrew Hooyman;Gabriele Wulf;Rebecca Lewthwaite

  • Optimizing motivation and attention for motor performance and learning.

    Rebecca Lewthwaite;Gabriele Wulf

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriele Wulf
Gabriele Wulf University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Carolee J. Winstein
Carolee J. Winstein University of Southern California
Suzete Chiviacowsky
Suzete Chiviacowsky Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Nicolas Schweighofer
Nicolas Schweighofer University of Southern California
John Monterosso
John Monterosso University of Southern California
Stanley P. Azen
Stanley P. Azen University of Southern California
Helena C. Chui
Helena C. Chui University of Southern California
Amy K. Wagner
Amy K. Wagner University of Pittsburgh
Lara A. Boyd
Lara A. Boyd University of British Columbia
Julie M. Fritz
Julie M. Fritz University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Social Sciences and Humanities offers flexible ways to advance your career or change fields entirely. Popular options include accelerated msw programs for those seeking impactful roles in social work. These programs are designed for faster completion, making it easier to join the workforce or move up in your current position.

If you’re interested in mental health or human behavior, consider a fast track bachelor degree in psychology. These online degrees help you quickly gain foundational knowledge for various careers, from human resources to counseling.

For those aiming to become professional counselors, choosing cacrep accredited schools is crucial. CACREP accreditation ensures your degree meets industry standards, a vital step for licensure and career security.

Additionally, if you’re passionate about helping families and couples, pursuing mft masters programs online can prepare you for specialized therapy careers. These degrees blend theory and practical experience to meet growing demand in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Lewthwaite

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles