World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 90 12329 6313 330 26129

Raymond L. Hintz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raymond L. Hintz between 1972 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raymond L. Hintz published across 47 years, from 1972 to 2018, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1986. 1 of the 330 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1986. 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 9 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 18 publications 1982: 14 publications 1983: 9 publications 1984: 18 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 19 publications 1987: 18 publications 1988: 19 publications 1989: 19 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication
1972 2018

330 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raymond L. Hintz: publications per year, 1972 to 2018
Year Publications
1972 2
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 0
1977 6
1978 9
1979 8
1980 9
1981 18
1982 14
1983 9
1984 18
1985 13
1986 19
1987 18
1988 19
1989 19
1990 7
1991 11
1992 8
1993 8
1994 9
1995 16
1996 18
1997 11
1998 11
1999 9
2000 7
2001 4
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 3
2006 6
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
Total 330
Download as CSV

Raymond L. Hintz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond L. Hintz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 330 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 330
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Raymond L. Hintz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond L. Hintz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 90
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Raymond L. Hintz was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States during their academic career. The scientist's work was associated with this institution, reflecting a connection to one of the prominent centers of research in the country.

There are no recorded recent papers, listed co-authors, or frequent publication venues available in the source data for Raymond L. Hintz. No book publications have been documented either, indicating limited publicly available bibliographic information concerning their output.

No main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics of work were specified for this scientist in the data. Similarly, no awards were recorded, and no precise years or citations related to distinctions were noted.

As Raymond L. Hintz is deceased, the details reflect a retrospective account of their academic association rather than current activity or ongoing research. The absence of detailed publication or topic data results in a profile that emphasizes institutional affiliation without additional insights into the research content or scholarly impact.

Best Publications

  • Somatomedin-C mediates growth hormone negative feedback by effects on both the hypothalamus and the pituitary

    Michael Berelowitz;Marta Szabo;Lawrence A. Frohman;Susan Firestone

  • Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: Summary statement of the GH research society

    Kenneth M. Attie;Bengt Ake Bengtsson;Sandra L. Blethen;Werner Blum

  • Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adulthood and the Effects of Growth Hormone Replacement: A Review

    P Carroll;E R Christ;B A Bengtsson;L Carlsson

  • Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with growth hormone deficiency: Summary statement of the growth hormone research society workshop on adult growth hormone deficiency

    A. Attanasio;K. Attie;R. Baxter;B. A. Bengtsson

  • Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome

    P. Saenger;K. Albertsson Wikland;G. S. Conway;M. Davenport

  • Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in the term and preterm human fetus and neonate with normal and extremes of intrauterine growth

    Linda C. Giudice;F. de Zegher;S. E. Gargosky;B. A. Dsupin

  • Diagnostic controversy: the diagnosis of childhood growth hormone deficiency revisited.

    R G Rosenfeld;K Albertsson-Wikland;F Cassorla;S D Frasier

  • ESPE/LWPES consensus statement on diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents

    D. B. Dunger;M. A. Sperling;C. L. Acerini;D. J. Bohn

  • Effect of recombinant human growth hormone on the muscle strength response to resistance exercise in elderly men.

    Dennis R. Taaffe;Leslie Pruitt;Jennifer Reim;Raymond L. Hintz

  • Demonstration of Specific Plasma Protein Binding Sites For Somatomedin

    R. L. Hintz;F. Liu

  • Multicenter clinical trial of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I in patients with acute renal failure

    Raimund Hirschberg;Joel Kopple;Pamela Lipsett;Ernest Benjamin

  • Plasma somatomedin and growth hormone values in children with protein-calorie malnutrition.

    Raymond L. Hintz;Robert Suskind;Kosin Amatayakul;Ousa Thanangkul

  • Acute effect of brief low- and high-intensity exercise on circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, II, and IGF-binding protein-3 and its proteolysis in young healthy men

    Adam J. Schwarz;Jo Anne Brasel;Raymond L. Hintz;Subburaman Mohan

  • Serum insulin-like growth factors I and II concentrations and growth hormone and insulin responses to arginine infusion in children with protein-energy malnutrition before and after nutritional rehabilitation.

    Ashraf T Soliman;Abd El Hadi I Hassan;Mohamed K Aref;Raymond L Hintz

  • Effect of Growth Hormone Treatment on Adult Height of Children with Idiopathic Short Stature

    Raymond L. Hintz;Kenneth M. Attie;Joyce Baptista;Alex Roche

  • Insulin-like growth factors I and II in evaluation of growth retardation

    Ron G. Rosenfeld;Darrell M. Wilson;Phillip D.K. Lee;Raymond L. Hintz

  • Normal ranges for immunochemiluminometric gonadotropin assays

    E.Kirk Neely;Raymond L. Hintz;Darrell M. Wilson;Peter A. Lee

  • Somatomedins in adolescence: a cross-sectional study of the effect of puberty on plasma insulin-like growth factor I and II levels.

    Alice M. Luna;Darrell M. Wilson;Charles J. Wibbelsman;Richard C. Brown

  • Effect of Diabetes and its Control on Insulin-like Growth Factors in the Young Subject with Type I Diabetes

    S A Amiel;R S Sherwin;R L Hintz;J M Gertner

  • Somatomedin-C levels in healthy young and old men: relationship to peak and 24-hour integrated levels of growth hormone.

    James R. Florini;Patricia N. Prinz;Michael V. Vitiello;Raymond L. Hintz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron G. Rosenfeld
Ron G. Rosenfeld Oregon Health & Science University
Darrell M. Wilson
Darrell M. Wilson Stanford University
Andrew R. Hoffman
Andrew R. Hoffman Stanford University
Pinchas Cohen
Pinchas Cohen University of Southern California
Robert Marcus
Robert Marcus Stanford University
Peter E. Clayton
Peter E. Clayton University of Manchester
Robert C. Baxter
Robert C. Baxter University of Sydney
Michael O. Thorner
Michael O. Thorner University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring flexible online degrees is an excellent way for aspiring and practicing healthcare professionals to advance their careers in medicine. There are now a variety of accelerated options for nurses at every stage who want to balance work, study, and family commitments.

For registered nurses wondering, does rn to bsn require clinicals, several RN-to-BSN programs are designed with minimal or no in-person clinical components, making it easier to fit studies around your schedule. Licensed practical nurses may also benefit from lpn online programs that offer fast-track pathways, enabling quicker entry into advanced nursing roles.

For those seeking doctoral qualifications, options such as the shortest dnp program online provide an efficient route to leadership positions in nursing. Additionally, affordability can be a concern—researching the cheapest dnp program options online can help ensure your advanced education fits your budget.

These online degree pathways offer diverse, accessible routes to future careers in healthcare, often with the flexibility needed for working students.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond L. Hintz

Recently Published Articles