World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 50 14209 12791 3668 2997 135 24385

Ray Luo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ray Luo between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ray Luo published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2025. 32 of the 218 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2025. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 2 publications
1999 2026

218 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ray Luo: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 2
2001 4
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 5
2007 4
2008 5
2009 5
2010 6
2011 6
2012 6
2013 7
2014 5
2015 6
2016 7
2017 15
2018 11
2019 11
2020 8
2021 8
2022 15
2023 14
2024 25
2025 30
2026 2
Total 218
Download as CSV

Ray Luo publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Luo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 135 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918 135
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Ray Luo D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Luo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861 50
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ray Luo is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on Molecular Biology. Their work also extends into related subfields such as Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Atmospheric Science, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's research interests are reflected in their main topics of work, which include:

  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Ray Luo's publication record shows recurring contributions to several reputable scientific journals. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • Biophysical Journal
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Communications

Their scientific output includes multiple research papers, some of the notable recent works being:

  • AmberTools, 2023, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Recent Force Field Strategies for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, 2021, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery, 2021, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
  • Role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing drug discovery, 2024, Fundamental Research
  • Environment-Specific Force Field for Intrinsically Disordered and Ordered Proteins, 2020, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Collaboration has been a significant aspect of their career. Ray Luo frequently co-authors with several researchers, including:

  • Yong Duan
  • Piotr Cieplak
  • Yongxian Wu
  • Shiji Zhao
  • Haixin Wei

Best Publications

  • The Amber biomolecular simulation programs

    David A. Case;Thomas E. Cheatham;Tom Darden;Holger Gohlke

  • A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

    Yong Duan;Chun Wu;Shibasish Chowdhury;Mathew C. Lee

  • Recent Developments and Applications of the MMPBSA Method.

    Changhao Wang;D'Artagnan Greene;Li Xiao;Ruxi Qi

  • Accelerated Poisson-Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems.

    Ray Luo;Laurent David;Michael K. Gilson

  • Implicit Nonpolar Solvent Models

    Chunhu Tan;Yu-Hong Tan;Ray Luo

  • New-Generation Amber United-Atom Force Field

    Lijiang Yang;Chun Hu Tan;Meng Juei Hsieh;Junmei Wang

  • Calculating protein-ligand binding affinities with MMPBSA: Method and error analysis.

    Changhao Wang;Peter H. Nguyen;Kevin Pham;Danielle Huynh

  • Virtual screening using molecular simulations

    Tianyi Yang;Johnny C. Wu;Chunli Yan;Yuanfeng Wang

  • How well does Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent agree with explicit solvent? A quantitative analysis.

    Chunhu Tan;Lijiang Yang;Ray Luo

  • A Poisson–Boltzmann dynamics method with nonperiodic boundary condition

    Qiang Lu;Ray Luo

  • The IDP-Specific Force Field ff14IDPSFF Improves the Conformer Sampling of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

    Dong Song;Ray Luo;Hai-Feng Chen

  • Development of Polarizable Models for Molecular Mechanical Calculations I: Parameterization of Atomic Polarizability

    Junmei Wang;Piotr Cieplak;Jie Li;Tingjun Hou

  • New Force Field on Modeling Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

    Wei Wang;Wei Ye;Cheng Jiang;Ray Luo

  • An analysis of the interactions between the Sem-5 SH3 domain and its ligands using molecular dynamics, free energy calculations, and sequence analysis.

    Wei Wang;Wendell A. Lim;Araz Jakalian;Jian Wang

  • Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations II: induced dipole models significantly improve accuracy of intermolecular interaction energies.

    Junmei Wang;Piotr Cieplak;Jie Li;Jun Wang

  • Binding Induced Folding in p53-MDM2 Complex

    Hai-Feng Chen;Ray Luo

  • Comparison of generalized born and poisson models: Energetics and dynamics of HIV protease

    Laurent David;Ray Luo;Michael K. Gilson

  • The physical basis of nucleic acid base stacking in water.

    Ray Luo;Hillary S.R. Gilson;Michael J. Potter;Michael K. Gilson

  • Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery.

    Edward King;Erick Aitchison;Han Li;Ray Luo

  • Recent Force Field Strategies for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

    Junxi Mu;Hao Liu;Jian Zhang;Ray Luo

  • Assessment of Linear Finite-Difference Poisson-Boltzmann Solvers

    J. U N Wang;R. A Y Luo

  • Performance of Nonlinear Finite-Difference Poisson−Boltzmann Solvers

    Qin Cai;Meng-Juei Hsieh;Jun Wang;Ray Luo

Frequent Co-Authors

Junmei Wang
Junmei Wang University of Pittsburgh
Piotr Cieplak
Piotr Cieplak Discovery Institute
Michael K. Gilson
Michael K. Gilson University of California, San Diego
Hongkai Zhao
Hongkai Zhao Duke University
Pengyu Ren
Pengyu Ren The University of Texas at Austin
Peter A. Kollman
Peter A. Kollman University of California, San Francisco
David A. Case
David A. Case Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Holger Gohlke
Holger Gohlke Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Kenneth M. Merz
Kenneth M. Merz Michigan State University
Thomas E. Cheatham
Thomas E. Cheatham University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways beyond traditional laboratory roles. Many students explore specialized fields by pursuing related online degrees, which offer flexibility and accessibility. For those interested in the healthcare sector, becoming a pharmacist is a rewarding option. Understanding how to become a pharmacist salary and career expectations can help guide educational and professional decisions. Online programs often provide foundational knowledge essential for this path.

Another emerging career is pharmaceutical sales, where a strong scientific background is crucial. Learning how to become a pharmaceutical sales rep salary and career paths details can offer insight into navigating this dynamic industry. This role combines chemistry expertise with communication skills to effectively promote medical products.

For chemistry graduates intrigued by forensic science, pursuing an online forensic science degree program is a practical step. These programs provide specialized training that prepares students for investigative roles in legal contexts. The availability of online colleges for forensic science allows students to balance studies with other commitments.

Additionally, becoming an autopsy technician requires targeted education and training. Reviewing how to become an autopsy tech education salary and job outlook can help prospective students understand the qualifications needed and the potential employment opportunities in this unique field. Overall, a chemistry degree can lead to a variety of exciting and impactful careers when paired with the right online education.

Best Scientists Citing Ray Luo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles