World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pol Coppin

Pol Coppin

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
16824
World Ranking
3571
National Ranking
54

Pol Coppin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pol Coppin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 282 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Pol Coppin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pol Coppin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pol Coppin is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium. Their academic activities and research contributions are connected to this institution.

Aspects of their research profile such as recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields and subfields of study, main topics of work, and awards are not publicly detailed in the available data.

Given the current information, no specific details about publications or research topics are accessible for Pol Coppin.

They are currently recorded as active and not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review

    P Coppin;I Jonckheere;Kristiaan Nackaerts;Bart Muys

  • Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography

    Inge Jonckheere;Stefan Fleck;Kris Nackaerts;Bart Muys

  • Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling

    M Weiss;F Baret;GJ Smith;Inge Jonckheere

  • Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery

    Pol R. Coppin;Marvin E. Bauer

  • Endmember variability in Spectral Mixture Analysis: A review

    Ben Somers;Ben Somers;Gregory P. Asner;Laurent Tits;Pol Coppin

  • Integrating Contextual Information with per-Pixel Classification for Improved Land Cover Classification

    Jan Stuckens;Pol Coppin;ME Bauer

  • Processing of multitemporal Landsat TM imagery to optimize extraction of forest cover change features

    P.R. Coppin;M.E. Bauer

  • Effects of area, age and diversity of forest patches in Belgium on plant species richness, and implications for conservation and reforestation

    Olivier Honnay;Martin Hermy;Pol Coppin

  • A comparison of time series similarity measures for classification and change detection of ecosystem dynamics

    Stef Lhermitte;Stef Lhermitte;Jan Verbesselt;Willem Verstraeten;Willem Verstraeten;Pol Coppin

  • Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources

    Marvin E. Bauer;Thomas E. Burk;Alan R. Ek;Pol R. Coppin

  • Impact of habitat quality on forest plant species colonization

    Olivier Honnay;Martin Hermy;Pol Coppin

  • Detection of biotic stress (Venturia inaequalis) in apple trees using hyperspectral data: Non-parametric statistical approaches and physiological implications

    Stephanie Delalieux;Jan van Aardt;Wannes Keulemans;Eddie Schrevens

  • Nonlinear Hyperspectral Mixture Analysis for tree cover estimates in orchards

    Ben Somers;Kenneth Cools;Stephanie Delalieux;Jan Stuckens

  • A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short‐term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover

    Wanda De Keersmaecker;Stef Lhermitte;Laurent Tits;Olivier Honnay

  • Influence of measurement set-up of ground-based LiDAR for derivation of tree structure

    Dimitry Van der Zande;Wouter Hoet;Inge Jonckheere;Jan van Aardt

  • Impact of forest canopy on quality and accuracy of GPS measurements

    P Sigrist;Pol Coppin;Martin Hermy

  • Assessment of automatic gap fraction estimation of forests from digital hemispherical photography

    Inge Jonckheere;Kris Nackaerts;Bart Muys;Pol Coppin

  • Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modelling of the effective geographical distance

    E. Michels;K. Cottenie;L. Neys;K. De Gelas

  • Nested plant communities in deciduous forest fragments : species relaxation or nested habitats?

    Olivier Honnay;Martin Hermy;Pol Coppin

  • Climatic signals in tree rings of Burkea africana and Pterocarpus angolensis from semiarid forests in Namibia

    Esther Fichtler;Valerie Trouet;Hans Beeckman;Pol Coppin

  • Model inversion for chlorophyll estimation in open canopies from hyperspectral imagery

    P. Kempeneers;P. J. Zarco-Tejada;P. R. J. North;S. de Backer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Somers
Ben Somers KU Leuven
Jan Verbesselt
Jan Verbesselt Wageningen University & Research
Rony Swennen
Rony Swennen KU Leuven
Martin Hermy
Martin Hermy KU Leuven
Paul Scheunders
Paul Scheunders University of Antwerp
Marvin E. Bauer
Marvin E. Bauer University of Minnesota
Piet Maes
Piet Maes KU Leuven
Hans Beeckman
Hans Beeckman Royal Museum for Central Africa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary opportunities, including advanced studies that blend education, social work, and general studies. For professionals seeking leadership roles in environmental education, exploring online edd no dissertation options can be a strategic choice. These programs often reduce barriers to doctoral completion, allowing for focused expertise development without the traditional dissertation requirement.

For educators aiming to elevate their qualifications, the pathway from best eds to edd programs offers streamlined transitions, combining practical teaching skills with advanced leadership preparation relevant to environmental curriculum development and policy influence.

Those interested in the social dimensions of environmental challenges may find value in dsw online programs. These affordable, flexible options prepare graduates for impactful careers addressing community health, sustainability, and social justice – all critical components of environmental sciences.

Additionally, a broad foundational knowledge supported by a cheap online general studies degree can complement specialized environmental training. This pathway provides cost-effective access to essential skills across multiple disciplines, enhancing career adaptability in a rapidly evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Pol Coppin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles