World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pierre D. Delmas

Pierre D. Delmas

Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
France
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 182 578 11 774 134495
Medicine 183 327 7 750 135617

Pierre D. Delmas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pierre D. Delmas between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pierre D. Delmas published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 74 publications in 2009. 3 of the 776 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 74. Peak 74 publications in 2009. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 9 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 17 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 19 publications 1993: 19 publications 1994: 20 publications 1995: 20 publications 1996: 33 publications 1997: 28 publications 1998: 24 publications 1999: 31 publications 2000: 41 publications 2001: 34 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 28 publications 2004: 38 publications 2005: 34 publications 2006: 44 publications 2007: 62 publications 2008: 53 publications 2009: 74 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications
1982 2024

776 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pierre D. Delmas: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 3
1984 5
1985 1
1986 9
1987 8
1988 12
1989 12
1990 17
1991 18
1992 19
1993 19
1994 20
1995 20
1996 33
1997 28
1998 24
1999 31
2000 41
2001 34
2002 24
2003 28
2004 38
2005 34
2006 44
2007 62
2008 53
2009 74
2010 35
2011 12
2012 3
2013 8
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 3
Total 776
Download as CSV

Pierre D. Delmas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre D. Delmas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 750 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 750
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre D. Delmas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre D. Delmas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 182–183 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 183 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31 183
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in France Leader Award

Overview

Pierre D. Delmas was affiliated with Inserm in France. Their research spanned extensively in the field of Medicine with a significant focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Epidemiology.

Their work covered various key topics including:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Frequent co-authors included Zanfina Ademi, Ella Zomer, Clara Marquina, Christopher M. Reid, and Dion Stub. These collaborations reflect a broad network within various subfields related to health and economics.

Their publications appeared regularly in several venues known for research in cardiovascular and health economics fields:

  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Value in Health
  • European Heart Journal
  • PharmacoEconomics
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Representative papers featuring either direct involvement or close association through co-authors included:

  • Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis (2021, BMJ)
  • Smell and Taste Dysfunction in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2020, Mayo Clinic Proceedings)
  • Standard gastroenterologist versus multidisciplinary treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders (MANTRA): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial (2020, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology)
  • Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Risk of Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty (2022, JAMA Network Open)
  • Cardiorenal syndrome: Multi-organ dysfunction involving the heart, kidney and vasculature (2020, British Journal of Pharmacology)

Their scholarly impact included numerous citations, notably 782 for the public health measures review in BMJ and 465 for the COVID-19 related systematic review in Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

Best Publications

  • Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial

    Bruce Ettinger;Dennis M. Black;Bruce H. Mitlak;Ronald K. Knickerbocker

  • Vitamin D3 and Calcium to Prevent Hip Fractures in Elderly Women

    Marie C. Chapuy;Monique E. Arlot;Francois Duboeuf;Jacqueline Brun

  • Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

    Dennis M. Black;Pierre D. Delmas;Richard Eastell;Ian R. Reid

  • Denosumab for Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

    Steven R. Cummings;Javier San Martin;Michael R. Mcclung;Ethel S. Siris

  • ASSESSMENT OF FRACTURE RISK AND ITS APPLICATION TO SCREENING FOR POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS

    L Alexeeva;P Burkhardt;C Christiansen;C Cooper

  • Bone Quality — The Material and Structural Basis of Bone Strength and Fragility

    Ego Seeman;Pierre D. Delmas

  • EFFECTS OF RALOXIFENE ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY, SERUM CHOLESTEROL CONCENTRATIONS, AND UTERINE ENDOMETRIUM IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

    Pierre D. Delmas;Nina H. Bjarnason;Bruce H. Mitlak;Anne-Catherine Ravoux

  • Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: A meta-analysis

    C De Laet;JA Kanis;A Oden;H Johanson

  • Predictive Value of BMD for Hip and Other Fractures

    Olof Johnell;John A Kanis;Anders Oden;Helena Johansson

  • A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk

    J A Kanis;O Johnell;C De Laet;Helena Johansson

  • ALENDRONATE FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF GLUCOCORTICOID-INDUCED OSTEOPOROSIS

    Kenneth G. Saag;Ronald Emkey;Thomas J. Schnitzer;Jacques P. Brown

  • Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study.

    D Hans;P Dargent-Molina;AM Schott;JL Sebert

  • Effects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

    Charles H Chesnut;Arne Skag;Claus Christiansen;Robert Recker

  • In Vivo Assessment of Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography."

    Stephanie Boutroy;Mary L. Bouxsein;Francoise Munoz;Pierre D. Delmas

  • Markers of bone resorption predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS Prospective Study.

    P. Garnero;E. Hausherr;M.-C. Chapuy;C. Marcelli

  • Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis

    Patrick Garnero;Elizabeth Sornay‐Rendu;Marie‐Claire Chapuy;Pierre D. Delmas

  • The role of collagen in bone strength.

    S. Viguet-Carrin;P. Garnero;P. D. Delmas

  • Dietary supplementation in elderly patients with fractured neck of the femur.

    M Delmi;C H Rapin;J M Bengoa;P D Delmas

  • Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

    J A Kanis;P Delmas;P Burckhardt;C Cooper

  • Interim Report and Recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis

    H K Genant;C Cooper;G Poor;I Reid

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland Chapurlat
Roland Chapurlat Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Jean-Yves Reginster
Jean-Yves Reginster University of Liège
Ego Seeman
Ego Seeman University of Melbourne
Richard Eastell
Richard Eastell University of Sheffield
René Rizzoli
René Rizzoli Geneva College
Steven Boonen
Steven Boonen KU Leuven
Mary L. Bouxsein
Mary L. Bouxsein Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Dennis M. Black
Dennis M. Black University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA often leads students to consider various healthcare-related degrees and career options. For those interested in hands-on patient care, nursing is a popular pathway. Some students are concerned about admission difficulty, so they may look for whats the easiest nursing program to get into? This can make entering the field more accessible and less stressful.

Others may seek alternatives to direct clinical work, such as medical billing and coding. Affordable education matters, and it’s worth learning about financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes to help offset costs.

Some nursing programs require entrance tests like TEAS or HESI, but there are institutions where they are not mandatory. If you want a smoother admissions process, check out nursing schools that don't require teas test.

Leadership roles in healthcare are also in demand. If you’re interested in administrative positions, earning a degree from one of the best online healthcare administration degree programs could launch your career in hospital management, healthcare policy, or consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre D. Delmas

Recently Published Articles