World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
35
Citations
3579
World Ranking
5220
National Ranking
1270

Philippe E. Rolshausen publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe E. Rolshausen sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 91 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Philippe E. Rolshausen D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe E. Rolshausen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Delivery, uptake, fate, and transport of engineered nanoparticles in plants: a critical review and data analysis

    Yiming Su;Vanessa Ashworth;Caroline Kim;Adeyemi S. Adeleye

  • Evaluation of pruning wound susceptibility and protection against fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases.

    Philippe E. Rolshausen;José Ramón Úrbez-Torres;Suzanne Rooney-Latham;Akif Eskalen

  • Distinctive expansion of gene families associated with plant cell wall degradation, secondary metabolism, and nutrient uptake in the genomes of grapevine trunk pathogens

    Abraham Morales-Cruz;Katherine C. H. Amrine;Barbara Blanco-Ulate;Daniel P. Lawrence

  • Can vessel dimension explain tolerance toward fungal vascular wilt diseases in woody plants? Lessons from Dutch elm disease and esca disease in grapevine

    Jérôme Pouzoulet;Alexandria L. Pivovaroff;Louis S. Santiago;Philippe E. Rolshausen

  • Cadophora species associated with wood-decay of grapevine in North America.

    Renaud Travadon;Daniel P. Lawrence;Suzanne Rooney-Latham;Walter D. Gubler

  • Use of Boron for the Control of Eutypa Dieback of Grapevines.

    P. E. Rolshausen;W. D. Gubler

  • Pathogenesis of Eutypa lata in grapevine: identification of virulence factors and biochemical characterization of cordon dieback.

    P E Rolshausen;L C Greve;J M Labavitch;N E Mahoney

  • Characterization of Species of Diaporthe from Wood Cankers of Grape in Eastern North American Vineyards.

    Kendra Baumgartner;Phillip T Fujiyoshi;Renaud Travadon;Lisa A Castlebury

  • Susceptibility of Cultivated and Wild Vitis spp. to Wood Infection by Fungal Trunk Pathogens

    Renaud Travadon;Philippe E. Rolshausen;Walter D. Gubler;Lance Cadle-Davidson

  • Disease-Induced Microbial Shifts in Citrus Indicate Microbiome-Derived Responses to Huanglongbing Across the Disease Severity Spectrum

    Nichole A. Ginnan;Tyler Dang;Sohrab Bodaghi;Paul M. Ruegger

  • Endophytic microbial assemblage in grapevine.

    E Deyett;P E Rolshausen

  • Xylem Vessel Diameter Affects the Compartmentalization of the Vascular Pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in Grapevine

    Jérôme Pouzoulet;Elia Scudiero;Marco Schiavon;Philippe E. Rolshausen

  • Draft Genome Sequence of Neofusicoccum parvum Isolate UCR-NP2, a Fungal Vascular Pathogen Associated with Grapevine Cankers.

    Barbara Blanco-Ulate;Philippe Rolshausen;Dario Cantu

  • Delivery, Fate, and Mobility of Silver Nanoparticles in Citrus Trees.

    Yiming Su;Vanessa E T M Ashworth;Nicholas K Geitner;Mark R Wiesner

  • Global transcriptional analysis suggests Lasiodiplodia theobromae pathogenicity factors involved in modulation of grapevine defensive response.

    Marcos Paolinelli-Alfonso;José Manuel Villalobos-Escobedo;Philippe Rolshausen;Alfredo Herrera-Estrella

  • Phylogenomics of Plant-Associated Botryosphaeriaceae Species.

    Jadran F. Garcia;Daniel P. Lawrence;Abraham Morales-Cruz;Abraham Morales-Cruz;Renaud Travadon

  • Draft Genome Sequence of the Grapevine Dieback Fungus Eutypa lata UCR-EL1

    Barbara Blanco-Ulate;Philippe E. Rolshausen;Dario Cantu

  • Identification of Eutypa lata by PCR-RFLP.

    P E Rolshausen;F Trouillas;W D Gubler

  • Temporal Dynamics of the Sap Microbiome of Grapevine Under High Pierce's Disease Pressure.

    Elizabeth Deyett;Philippe E. Rolshausen

  • Characterization of Cytospora isolates from wood cankers of declining grapevine in North America, with the descriptions of two new Cytospora species

    D. P. Lawrence;R. Travadon;J. Pouzoulet;P. E. Rolshausen

  • Microbial Landscape of the Grapevine Endosphere in the Context of Pierce’s Disease

    Elizabeth Deyett;M. Caroline Roper;Paul Ruegger;Jiue-In Yang

  • A Reassessment of the Species Concept in Eutypa lata, the Causal Agent of Eutypa Dieback of Grapevine

    P. E. Rolshausen;N. E. Mahoney;R. J. Molyneux;W. D. Gubler

  • Dying-arm disease in grapevines: diagnosis of infection with Eutypa lata by metabolite analysis.

    N. Mahoney;R. J. Molyneux;L. R. Smith;T. K. Schoch

Frequent Co-Authors

Dario Cantu
Dario Cantu University of California, Davis
Walter D. Gubler
Walter D. Gubler University of California, Davis
Daniel P. Lawrence
Daniel P. Lawrence University of California, Davis
James Borneman
James Borneman University of California, Riverside
Wayne F. Wilcox
Wayne F. Wilcox Cornell University
Russell J. Molyneux
Russell J. Molyneux University of Hawaii at Hilo
Kendra Baumgartner
Kendra Baumgartner Agricultural Research Service
Louis S. Santiago
Louis S. Santiago University of California, Riverside
David Jassby
David Jassby University of California, Los Angeles
Akif Eskalen
Akif Eskalen University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Philippe E. Rolshausen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles