World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
37
Citations
12362
World Ranking
8231
National Ranking
2264

Philip J. Kuekes publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Kuekes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 138 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Philip J. Kuekes D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Kuekes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip J. Kuekes is affiliated with Hewlett-Packard in the United States. Their career involves scientific research connected to this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues documented for Philip J. Kuekes in the available data.

No book publications, main fields of study, subfields of study, or main topics of work have been recorded for this researcher.

There are no awards listed for Philip J. Kuekes at this time.

Best Publications

  • Electronically Configurable Molecular-Based Logic Gates

    C. P. Collier;E. W. Wong;M. Belohradský;F. M. Raymo

  • ‘Memristive’ switches enable ‘stateful’ logic operations via material implication

    Julien Borghetti;Gregory S. Snider;Philip J. Kuekes;J. Joshua Yang

  • A Defect-Tolerant Computer Architecture: Opportunities for Nanotechnology

    James R. Heath;Philip J. Kuekes;Gregory S. Snider;R. Stanley Williams

  • Molecular wire crossbar memory

    Philip J. Kuekes;R. Stanley Williams;James R. Heath

  • Demultiplexer for a molecular wire crossbar network (MWCN DEMUX)

    Philip J. Kuekes;R. Stanley Williams

  • Molecular-wire crossbar interconnect (MWCI) for signal routing and communications

    Philip J. Kuekes;R. Stanley Williams;James R. Heath

  • Nanoelectronic and Nanophotonic Interconnect

    R.G. Beausoleil;P.J. Kuekes;G.S. Snider;Shih-Yuan Wang

  • Writing to and reading from a nano-scale crossbar memory based on memristors.

    Pascal O Vontobel;Warren Robinett;Philip J Kuekes;Duncan R Stewart

  • CMOS-like logic in defective, nanoscale crossbars

    Greg Snider;Philip Kuekes;R Stanley Williams

  • The crossbar latch: Logic value storage, restoration, and inversion in crossbar circuits

    Philip J. Kuekes;Duncan R. Stewart;R. Stanley Williams

  • Assembly for monitoring an environment

    William Tong;Geoffrey Lyon;Philip Kuekes;Zhiyong Li

  • Chemically synthesized and assembled electronic devices

    James R. Heath;R. Stanley Williams;Philip J. Kuekes

  • Nanoelectronic architectures

    G. Snider;P. Kuekes;T. Hogg;R. Stanley Williams

  • Molecular wire transistor (MWT)

    Philip J. Kuekes;R. Stanley Williams

  • Defect tolerance on the Teramac custom computer

    Unknown

  • Crossbar-memory systems with nanowire crossbar junctions

    Philip J. Kuekes;Warren Robinett

  • Fabricating Arrays Of Metallic Nanostructures

    Philip J Kuekes;M. Saif Islam;Shih-Yuan Wang;Alexandre M. Bratkovski

  • Defect-tolerant interconnect to nanoelectronic circuits: internally redundant demultiplexers based on error-correcting codes

    Philip J Kuekes;Warren Robinett;Gadiel Seroussi;R Stanley Williams

  • Diffusion of Adhesion Layer Metals Controls Nanoscale Memristive Switching

    J. Joshua Yang;John Paul Strachan;Qiangfei Xia;Douglas A. A. Ohlberg

  • Radiation Hardness of ${ m TiO}_{2}$ Memristive Junctions

    William M Tong;J Joshua Yang;Philip J Kuekes;Duncan R Stewart

  • Photonic crystals with nanowire-based fabrication

    Zhiyong Li;R. Stanley Williams;M. Saif Islam;Philip J. Kuekes

  • Photonic interconnect system

    Raymond G. Beausoleil;Philip J. Kuekes;William J. Munro;Timothy P. Spiller

  • Nanowire-based photonic devices

    R. Stanley Williams;Shih-Yuan Wang;Philip J. Kuekes;Theodore I. Kamins

  • Molecular nanoelectronics

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

R. Stanley Williams
R. Stanley Williams Texas A&M University
Theodore I. Kamins
Theodore I. Kamins Stanford University
Wei Wu
Wei Wu Wuhan University
Zhiyong Li
Zhiyong Li Chinese Academy of Sciences
James R. Heath
James R. Heath California Institute of Technology
Raymond G. Beausoleil
Raymond G. Beausoleil Hewlett-Packard (United States)
J. Joshua Yang
J. Joshua Yang University of Southern California
Chandrakant D. Patel
Chandrakant D. Patel Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Ron M. Roth
Ron M. Roth Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Dmitri B. Strukov
Dmitri B. Strukov University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, especially when paired with the right business and leadership skills. For those interested in blending technical expertise with practical business knowledge, pursuing an online ba business administration can provide a strong foundation in management, finance, and operations. This makes graduates attractive to employers seeking well-rounded professionals.

If you're considering boosting your leadership potential, exploring the best online master's in organizational leadership is a smart move. These programs emphasize crucial skills like effective communication and strategic decision-making, which are highly valued in tech-driven industries.

For those aiming to advance into management roles within engineering or tech companies, check out the best online mba in operations management programs. These degrees focus on optimizing processes and resources within organizations, paving the way for influential roles in operations or project management.

Additionally, flexible options exist for busy professionals, like the best online mba no gmat programs. This ensures you can pursue advanced business credentials without standardized test barriers, making further education accessible for more aspiring engineers and technologists.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Kuekes

Recently Published Articles