World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
35
Citations
4463
World Ranking
1749
National Ranking
50

Per Madsen publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Madsen sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 157 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Per Madsen D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Madsen sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.

    O. F. Christensen;P. Madsen;B. Nielsen;T. Ostersen

  • Genetic parameters for milk production and persistency for Danish Holsteins estimated in random regression models using REML.

    Unknown

  • Genotype by Environment Interaction in Nordic Dairy Cattle Studied Using Reaction Norms

    Rebecka Kolmodin;Erling Strandberg;Per Madsen;Just Jensen

  • DMU - A Package for analyzing multivariate mixed models

    P. Madsen;P. Sørensen;G. Su;L. H. Damgaard

  • Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population

    Hongding Gao;Hongding Gao;Ole F Christensen;Per Madsen;Ulrik S Nielsen

  • Bayesian analysis of the linear reaction norm model with unknown covariates.

    G. Su;P. Madsen;M. S. Lund;D. Sorensen

  • Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending

    G. Su;P. Madsen;U.S. Nielsen;E.A. Mäntysaari

  • Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs

    Tage Ostersen;Ole F Christensen;Mark Henryon;Bjarne Nielsen

  • Genomic evaluation of both purebred and crossbred performances

    Ole F Christensen;Per Madsen;Bjarne Nielsen;Guosheng Su

  • Improvement in genetic evaluation of female fertility in dairy cattle using multiple-trait models including milk production traits.

    C. Sun;P. Madsen;M. S. Lund;Y. Zhang

  • Partitioning additive genetic variance into genomic and remaining polygenic components for complex traits in dairy cattle

    Just Jensen;Guosheng Su;Per Lav Madsen

  • Genetic Parameters of Postnatal Mortality in Danish Holstein Calves

    Unknown

  • Selection for increased number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and reduced piglet mortality.

    Bjarne Nielsen;Guosheng Su;Mogens Sandø Lund;Per Madsen

  • Genetic Relationship Between Body Condition Score, Dairy Character, Mastitis, and Diseases Other than Mastitis in First-Parity Danish Holstein Cows

    Unknown

  • A simple algorithm to estimate genetic variance in an animal threshold model using Bayesian inference.

    Jørgen Ødegård;Theo H E Meuwissen;Bjørg Heringstad;Per Madsen

  • Genetic improvement of livestock for organic farming systems

    Unknown

  • Phenotypic and genetic relationships between residual energy intake and growth, feed intake, and carcass traits of young bulls.

    J. Jensen;I. L. Mao;B. Bech Andersen;P. Madsen

  • A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs

    Ole F. Christensen;Bjarne Nielsen;Guosheng Su;Tao Xiang

  • Bayesian inference in the semiparametric log normal frailty model using Gibbs sampling

    Unknown

  • Genetic Analysis of Somatic Cell Score in Norwegian Cattle Using Random Regression Test-Day Models

    J. Ødegard;J. Jensen;G. Klemetsdal;P. Madsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Just Jensen
Just Jensen Aarhus University
Guosheng Su
Guosheng Su Aarhus University
Jørgen Ødegård
Jørgen Ødegård Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Esa Mäntysaari
Esa Mäntysaari Natural Resources Institute Finland
Bjørg Heringstad
Bjørg Heringstad Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Daniel Gianola
Daniel Gianola University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gunnar Klemetsdal
Gunnar Klemetsdal Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Mogens Sandø Lund
Mogens Sandø Lund Aarhus University
Peter Sørensen
Peter Sørensen Aarhus University
Ismo Strandén
Ismo Strandén Natural Resources Institute Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Animal Science and Veterinary studies opens up diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced through related online degrees. For instance, those interested in blending animal care with human well-being might consider pursuing an online doctorate in counseling, which can lead to specialized roles in animal-assisted therapy.

Graduates with an animal science degree can find high paying jobs with animal science degree across various sectors, including wildlife management, pharmaceuticals, and agribusiness, demonstrating the versatility of the field.

In addition, skills in management and leadership are valuable in roles such as an athletic director, where understanding both education and sports is crucial. The athletic director education requirements highlight the importance of specialized knowledge that can complement an animal science background.

For those focused on physical health and fitness aspects connected to animal care or personal development, enrolling in one of the exercise science online degree programs offers flexible and accelerated learning paths to expand expertise in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Per Madsen

Recently Published Articles