World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
24110
World Ranking
5654
National Ranking
437

Penelope K. Lindeque publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Penelope K. Lindeque sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Penelope K. Lindeque D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Penelope K. Lindeque sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review.

    Matthew Cole;Pennie Lindeque;Claudia Halsband;Tamara S. Galloway

  • Microplastic Ingestion by Zooplankton

    Matthew Cole;Pennie K. Lindeque;Elaine S. Fileman;Claudia Halsband

  • The Impact of Polystyrene Microplastics on Feeding, Function and Fecundity in the Marine Copepod Calanus helgolandicus

    Matthew Cole;Matthew Cole;Pennie Lindeque;Elaine Fileman;Claudia Halsband

  • Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms

    Matthew Cole;Hannah Webb;Pennie K. Lindeque;Elaine S. Fileman

  • Investigating microplastic trophic transfer in marine top predators.

    Sarah E. Nelms;Tamara S. Galloway;Brendan J. Godley;Dan S. Jarvis

  • Global ecological, social and economic impacts of marine plastic.

    Nicola J. Beaumont;Margrethe Aanesen;Melanie C. Austen;Tobias Börger

  • Bioavailability and effects of microplastics on marine zooplankton: A review.

    Zara L.R. Botterell;Nicola Beaumont;Tarquin Dorrington;Michael Steinke

  • Microplastics Alter the Properties and Sinking Rates of Zooplankton Faecal Pellets

    Matthew Cole;Penelope K. Lindeque;Elaine Fileman;James Clark;James Clark

  • A small-scale, portable method for extracting microplastics from marine sediments.

    Rachel L. Coppock;Matthew Cole;Penelope K. Lindeque;Ana M. Queirós

  • Microplastics and seafood: lower trophic organisms at highest risk of contamination.

    Chris Walkinshaw;Penelope K. Lindeque;Richard Thompson;Trevor Tolhurst

  • Microplastic ingestion in fish larvae in the western English Channel

    Madeleine Steer;Matthew Cole;Richard C. Thompson;Penelope K. Lindeque

  • Are we underestimating microplastic abundance in the marine environment? A comparison of microplastic capture with nets of different mesh-size

    Penelope K. Lindeque;Matthew Cole;Rachel L. Coppock;Ceri N. Lewis

  • Plastic and marine turtles: a review and call for research

    Sarah E. Nelms;Emily M. Duncan;Annette C. Broderick;Tamara S. Galloway

  • Microplastics in marine mammals stranded around the British coast: ubiquitous but transitory?

    Sarah E. Nelms;James Barnett;Andrew Brownlow;Nicholas J. Davison

  • Microplastic ingestion ubiquitous in marine turtles

    Emily M. Duncan;Emily M. Duncan;Annette C. Broderick;Wayne J. Fuller;Wayne J. Fuller;Tamara S. Galloway

  • Marine anthropogenic litter on British beaches: A 10-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data.

    SE Nelms;SE Nelms;C Coombes;LC Foster;TS Galloway

  • Next generation sequencing reveals the hidden diversity of zooplankton assemblages.

    Penelope K. Lindeque;Helen E. Parry;Rachel A. Harmer;Paul J. Somerfield

  • Marine microplastic debris: a targeted plan for understanding and quantifying interactions with marine life

    James R Clark;James R Clark;Matthew Cole;Matthew Cole;Penelope K Lindeque;Elaine Fileman

  • Metabarcoding of marine zooplankton: prospects, progress and pitfalls

    Ann Bucklin;Penelope K. Lindeque;Naiara Rodriguez-Ezpeleta;Aitor Albaina

  • Effects of Nylon Microplastic on Feeding, Lipid Accumulation, and Moulting in a Coldwater Copepod

    Matthew Cole;Rachel Coppock;Rachel Coppock;Penelope K Lindeque;Dag Altin

Frequent Co-Authors

Tamara S. Galloway
Tamara S. Galloway University of Exeter
Brendan J. Godley
Brendan J. Godley University of Exeter
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson Plymouth University
Angus Atkinson
Angus Atkinson Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Ana M. Queirós
Ana M. Queirós Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Annette C. Broderick
Annette C. Broderick University of Exeter
Roger P. Harris
Roger P. Harris Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Andrew G. Hirst
Andrew G. Hirst University of Liverpool
Paul J. Somerfield
Paul J. Somerfield Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Nicola Beaumont
Nicola Beaumont Plymouth Marine Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree options can broaden career opportunities. Programs such as online dsw programs in social work support environmental justice initiatives and community advocacy, making a significant impact on public policy and sustainable practices.

If you prefer a more flexible academic approach, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap might be an ideal choice. These programs often allow students to tailor coursework toward environmental topics while balancing other areas of interest.

For students seeking smoother admissions or less intensive coursework, the easiest bachelor degree to get can provide a solid foundation to enter the environmental field, especially when prioritizing speed and affordability without sacrificing quality.

Additionally, specialized fields like geology and earth sciences are critical to environmental careers. Pursuing a geoscience online degree equips students with practical skills in analyzing the planet's systems and addressing climate-related challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Penelope K. Lindeque

Recently Published Articles