World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 62 2828 2590 1128 999 167 19459

Paul D. Fey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul D. Fey between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul D. Fey published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2023. 10 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2023. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1993 2025

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul D. Fey: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 4
2000 5
2001 5
2002 1
2003 4
2004 5
2005 3
2006 1
2007 6
2008 8
2009 5
2010 8
2011 2
2012 7
2013 12
2014 11
2015 11
2016 12
2017 11
2018 9
2019 11
2020 9
2021 5
2022 8
2023 15
2024 6
2025 4
Total 190
Download as CSV

Paul D. Fey publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Fey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 165–174 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 167 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253 167
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Paul D. Fey D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Fey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126 62
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul D. Fey is affiliated with the University of Nebraska Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions in subfields such as Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Clinical Biochemistry, and Epidemiology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to antimicrobial resistance and bacterial physiology. Key areas of study include:

  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance

Paul D. Fey has been involved in multiple publications across several scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets for their research include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • mBio
  • PLoS Pathogens

They have collaborated often with colleagues such as Vinai C. Thomas, Fareha Razvi, Jongsam Ahn, Dhananjay Shinde, and Mark E. Rupp.

Among recent published papers associated with or relevant to their research network are:

  • Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2, 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology
  • The acid response network of Staphylococcus aureus, 2020, Current Opinion in Microbiology
  • Staphylococcus aureus ATP Synthase Promotes Biofilm Persistence by Influencing Innate Immunity, 2020, mBio
  • Identification of the main glutamine and glutamate transporters in Staphylococcus aureus and their impact on c-di-AMP production, 2020, Molecular Microbiology
  • Accumulation of Succinyl Coenzyme A Perturbs the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Succinylome and Is Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Beta-Lactam Antibiotics, 2021, mBio

Best Publications

  • Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society

    Andre C. Kalil;Mark L. Metersky;Michael Klompas;John Muscedere

  • A Genetic Resource for Rapid and Comprehensive Phenotype Screening of Nonessential Staphylococcus aureus Genes

    Paul D. Fey;Jennifer L. Endres;Vijaya Kumar Yajjala;Todd J. Widhelm

  • Ceftriaxone-resistant salmonella infection acquired by a child from cattle.

    Paul D. Fey;Thomas J. Safranek;Mark E. Rupp;Eileen F. Dunne

  • Multicenter Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel for Etiologic Diagnosis of Infectious Gastroenteritis

    Sarah N. Buss;Amy Leber;Kimberle Chapin;Paul D. Fey

  • Current concepts in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

    Paul D Fey;Michael E Olson

  • Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Infections

    Kathie L. Rogers;Paul D. Fey;Mark E. Rupp

  • Comparative Molecular Analysis of Community- or Hospital-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    P. D. Fey;B. Saïd-Salim;M. E. Rupp;S. H. Hinrichs

  • Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae: considerations for diagnosis, prevention and drug treatment.

    Mark E. Rupp;Paul D. Fey

  • Executive Summary: Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.

    Unknown

  • Characterization of the importance of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-based infection in a mouse foreign body infection model

    Mark E. Rupp;Joseph S. Ulphani;Paul D. Fey;Katrin Bartscht

  • Effect of silver-coated urinary catheters: Efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and antimicrobial resistance

    Mark E. Rupp;Mark E. Rupp;Theresa Fitzgerald;Nedra Marion;Virginia Helget

  • Emergence of domestically acquired ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella infections associated with AmpC β-lactamase.

    Eileen F. Dunne;Paul D. Fey;Pat Kludt;Roshan Reporter

  • Methicillin Resistance Alters the Biofilm Phenotype and Attenuates Virulence in Staphylococcus aureus Device-Associated Infections

    Clarissa Pozzi;Elaine M. Waters;Justine K. Rudkin;Carolyn R. Schaeffer

  • Characterization of the Importance of Staphylococcus epidermidis Autolysin and Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin in the Pathogenesis of Intravascular Catheter-Associated Infection in a Rat Model

    Mark E. Rupp;Paul D. Fey;Christine Heilmann;Friedrich Götz

  • Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin in the pathogenesis of intravascular catheter-associated infection in a rat model.

    Mark E. Rupp;Joseph S. Ulphani;Paul D. Fey;Dietrich Mack

  • Predicting the virulence of MRSA from its genome sequence

    Maisem Laabei;Mario Recker;Justine K. Rudkin;Mona Aldeljawi

  • Amino Acid Catabolism in Staphylococcus aureus and the Function of Carbon Catabolite Repression

    Cortney R. Halsey;Shulei Lei;Jacqueline K. Wax;Mckenzie K. Lehman

  • Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL Murein Hydrolase Activities in Cell Division, Autolysis, and Biofilm Formation

    Jeffrey L. Bose;McKenzie K. Lehman;Paul D. Fey;Kenneth W. Bayles

  • Genetic Tools To Enhance the Study of Gene Function and Regulation in Staphylococcus aureus

    Jeffrey L. Bose;Paul D. Fey;Kenneth W. Bayles

  • Characterization of Plasmids Carrying CMY-2 from Expanded-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Salmonella Strains Isolated in the United States between 1996 and 1998

    A. Carattoli;F. Tosini;W. P. Giles;M. E. Rupp

  • Prevalence of non-O157:H7 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in diarrheal stool samples from Nebraska.

    Paul D. Fey;R. S. Wickert;M. E. Rupp;T. J. Safranek

  • Identification of Common Subpopulations of Non-Sorbitol-Fermenting, β-Glucuronidase-Negative Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Bovine Production Environments and Human Clinical Samples

    Zhijie Yang;Joy Kovar;Jaehyoung Kim;Joseph Nietfeldt

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth W. Bayles
Kenneth W. Bayles University of Nebraska Medical Center
James P. O'Gara
James P. O'Gara University of Galway
Alexander R. Horswill
Alexander R. Horswill University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Tammy Kielian
Tammy Kielian University of Nebraska Medical Center
Robert Powers
Robert Powers University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Holger Rohde
Holger Rohde Universität Hamburg
Christine C. Ginocchio
Christine C. Ginocchio Qiagen (United States)
Aras Kadioglu
Aras Kadioglu University of Liverpool
Arnold S. Bayer
Arnold S. Bayer University of California, Los Angeles
Gary Xie
Gary Xie Los Alamos National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing a career related to microbiology, there are several relevant online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Many healthcare-related degrees can now be completed online, making it more accessible for students balancing work and life commitments. To explore options, consider looking into various online healthcare degrees that complement microbiology knowledge.

Public health is another field closely connected to microbiology. For students looking for flexible programs, some of the easiest MPH online programs to get into offer an excellent entry point into the public health workforce, combining microbiological science with community health strategies.

Career options can also extend beyond traditional science roles. For example, becoming a child life specialist involves working with children in healthcare settings, where understanding medical and biological concepts can be a distinct advantage.

Additionally, those with non-traditional backgrounds or challenges can still find opportunities in this field. Resources that highlight the best degrees for felons often include science and healthcare programs that accommodate diverse student needs and help overcome barriers to education and employment.

Best Scientists Citing Paul D. Fey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles