World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Netherlands
2026
Award Badge
Materials Science
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
136
Citations
70544
World Ranking
272
National Ranking
2

Chemistry

D-Index
138
Citations
73939
World Ranking
224
National Ranking
8

Freek Kapteijn publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freek Kapteijn sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 751 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Freek Kapteijn D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freek Kapteijn sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 138 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Materials Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Materials Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Catalysis
  • Organic chemistry
  • Oxygen

Freek Kapteijn mainly investigates Catalysis, Inorganic chemistry, Metal-organic framework, Chemical engineering and Adsorption. His research integrates issues of Oxide and Metal in his study of Catalysis. His Inorganic chemistry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Decomposition, Nitrogen, Selective catalytic reduction, Oxygen and Carbon.

The Metal-organic framework study combines topics in areas such as Nanotechnology, Surface modification, Polymer, Photochemistry and Amine gas treating. His work deals with themes such as Selectivity, Fischer–Tropsch process and Chromatography, which intersect with Chemical engineering. His Adsorption research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Propane, Zeolite, Molecule and Permeation.

His most cited work include:

  • Evolution of nitrogen functionalities in carbonaceous materials during pyrolysis (1438 citations)
  • Cobalt particle size effects in the fischer- : Tropsch reaction studied with carbon nanofiber supported catalysts (1074 citations)
  • Metal–organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation (1035 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Freek Kapteijn focuses on Catalysis, Inorganic chemistry, Chemical engineering, Adsorption and Zeolite. His study looks at the relationship between Catalysis and fields such as Carbon, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His Inorganic chemistry research incorporates themes from Decomposition, Selective catalytic reduction, Metal, Oxygen and Activated carbon.

Freek Kapteijn has researched Chemical engineering in several fields, including Mass transfer, Chromatography, Polymer, Metal-organic framework and Monolith. The study incorporates disciplines such as Propane, Thermodynamics and Molecule in addition to Adsorption. His studies in Zeolite integrate themes in fields like Permeation and Molecular sieve.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Catalysis (46.20%)
  • Inorganic chemistry (31.25%)
  • Chemical engineering (29.35%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Catalysis (46.20%)
  • Chemical engineering (29.35%)
  • Metal-organic framework (12.91%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Freek Kapteijn mostly deals with Catalysis, Chemical engineering, Metal-organic framework, Inorganic chemistry and Selectivity. Freek Kapteijn works mostly in the field of Catalysis, limiting it down to topics relating to Methanol and, in certain cases, ZSM-5, as a part of the same area of interest. His work carried out in the field of Chemical engineering brings together such families of science as Gas separation, Permeance, Adsorption and Polymer.

His study in Metal-organic framework is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Photocatalysis and Nanotechnology. His Inorganic chemistry study combines topics in areas such as Electrochemistry, Olefin fiber, Oxygen and Thermal stability. His studies deal with areas such as Propane, Dispersion and Cobalt as well as Selectivity.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Metal–organic and covalent organic frameworks as single-site catalysts (431 citations)
  • Challenges in the Greener Production of Formates/Formic Acid, Methanol, and DME by Heterogeneously Catalyzed CO2 Hydrogenation Processes. (371 citations)
  • Recent developments in zeolite membranes for gas separation (218 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Catalysis
  • Organic chemistry
  • Oxygen

Freek Kapteijn spends much of his time researching Catalysis, Metal-organic framework, Chemical engineering, Inorganic chemistry and Selectivity. His Catalysis research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Methanol, Carbide, Cobalt, Formic acid and Carbon. His Metal-organic framework research includes elements of Photocatalysis, Nanoparticle, Nanotechnology, Photochemistry and Pyrolysis.

His Chemical engineering research incorporates themes from Covalent bond, PROX and Calcination. His work deals with themes such as Hydrogen and Reactivity, which intersect with Inorganic chemistry. His Selectivity study combines topics in areas such as Porosity and Polymer.

Best Publications

  • Evolution of nitrogen functionalities in carbonaceous materials during pyrolysis

    J.R. Pels;F. Kapteijn;J.A. Moulijn;Q. Zhu

  • Metal–organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation

    Tania Rodenas;Ignacio Luz;Gonzalo Prieto;Beatriz Seoane

  • Cobalt particle size effects in the fischer- : Tropsch reaction studied with carbon nanofiber supported catalysts

    G. Leendert Bezemer;Johannes H. Bitter;Herman P. C. E. Kuipers;Heiko Oosterbeek

  • Challenges in the Greener Production of Formates/Formic Acid, Methanol, and DME by Heterogeneously Catalyzed CO2 Hydrogenation Processes.

    Andrea Álvarez;Atul Bansode;Atsushi Urakawa;Anastasiya V. Bavykina

  • Heterogeneous catalytic decomposition of nitrous oxide

    Freek Kapteijn;José Rodriguez-Mirasol;Jacob A. Moulijn

  • An Amine-Functionalized MIL-53 Metal−Organic Framework with Large Separation Power for CO2 and CH4

    Sarah Couck;Joeri F. M. Denayer;Gino V. Baron;Tom Rémy

  • Catalyst deactivation: is it predictable?: What to do?

    Jacob Moulijn;A. E. van Diepen;Freek Kapteijn

  • Metal–organic and covalent organic frameworks as single-site catalysts

    S. M. J. Rogge;A. Bavykina;J. Hajek;H. Garcia

  • Metal Organic Framework Catalysis: Quo vadis?

    Jorge Gascon;Avelino Corma;Freek Kapteijn;Francesc X. Llabrés i Xamena

  • Activity and selectivity of pure manganese oxides in the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia

    F. Kapteijn;L. Singoredjo;A. Andreini;J.A. Moulijn

  • Metal–organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: a solution for highly efficient CO2 capture?

    Beatriz Seoane;Joaquin Coronas;Ignacio Gascon;Miren Etxeberria Benavides

  • Direct Demonstration of Enhanced Diffusion in Mesoporous ZSM-5 Zeolite Obtained via Controlled Desilication

    Johan C Groen;Weidong Zhu;Sander Brouwer;Steven J Huynink

  • Ethane/Ethene Separation Turned on Its Head: Selective Ethane Adsorption on the Metal−Organic Framework ZIF-7 through a Gate-Opening Mechanism

    Canan Gücüyener;Johan van den Bergh;Jorge Gascon;Freek Kapteijn

  • Formation and control of N2O in nitric acid production: Where do we stand today?

    J Pérez-Ramı́rez;F Kapteijn;K Schöffel;J.A Moulijn

  • Multiphase monolith reactors: Chemical reaction engineering of segmented flow in microchannels

    Michiel T. Kreutzer;Freek Kapteijn;Jacob A. Moulijn;Johan J. Heiszwolf

  • Amino-based metal-organic frameworks as stable, highly active basic catalysts

    Jorge Gascon;Ugur Aktay;Maria D. Hernandez-Alonso;Gerard P.M. van Klink

  • Preparation of monolithic catalysts

    T. Alexander Nijhuis;Annemarie E. W. Beers;Theo Vergunst;Ingrid Hoek

  • Electrochemical Synthesis of Some Archetypical Zn2+, Cu2+, and Al3+ Metal Organic Frameworks

    Alberto Martinez Joaristi;Jana Juan-Alcañiz;Pablo Serra-Crespo;Freek Kapteijn

  • Zeolite based films, membranes and membrane reactors: Progress and prospects

    E.E. McLeary;J.C. Jansen;J.C. Jansen;F. Kapteijn

  • Synthesis and characterization of an amino functionalized MIL-101(Al): Separation and catalytic properties

    Pablo Serra-Crespo;Enrique V. Ramos-Fernandez;Jorge Gascon;Freek Kapteijn

  • Alumina-Supported Manganese Oxide Catalysts: I. Characterization: Effect of Precursor and Loading

    F. Kapteijn;A.D. Vanlangeveld;J.A. Moulijn;A. Andreini

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacob A. Moulijn
Jacob A. Moulijn Delft University of Technology
Jorge Gascon
Jorge Gascon King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Michiel Makkee
Michiel Makkee Delft University of Technology
Guido Mul
Guido Mul University of Twente
Weidong Zhu
Weidong Zhu Zhejiang Normal University
Michiel T. Kreutzer
Michiel T. Kreutzer Delft University of Technology
Emiel J. M. Hensen
Emiel J. M. Hensen Eindhoven University of Technology
Thijs J. H. Vlugt
Thijs J. H. Vlugt Delft University of Technology
Eli Stavitski
Eli Stavitski Brookhaven National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related fields such as forensic science can open diverse career opportunities. Understanding forensic career paths is essential for those wanting to apply chemical principles in criminal investigations and evidence analysis.

Many learners seek flexible study options, making online degrees a popular choice. When considering legal and justice-related fields, it’s important to be aware of criminal justice degree cost factors to find affordable programs that fit their budget.

For those starting out, identifying the best online criminal justice associate degree programs can provide a strong foundation and potential career pathways while allowing flexibility and cost efficiency.

Additionally, chemistry graduates may consider roles supporting legal processes, such as becoming paralegals. Learning about degrees for paralegals can help clarify educational options and salary expectations in this field.

Best Scientists Citing Freek Kapteijn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles