World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrizia Bisiacchi

Patrizia Bisiacchi

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
5452
World Ranking
7360
National Ranking
149

Patrizia Bisiacchi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrizia Bisiacchi sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Patrizia Bisiacchi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrizia Bisiacchi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrizia Bisiacchi is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Their research spans cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, pediatrics, neurology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work focuses on several key topics, including:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Motor Control and Adaptation

Patrizia Bisiacchi has co-authored frequently with multiple researchers in their field. The most prolific collaborators include:

  • Elisa Cainelli (16 co-authored works)
  • Luca Vedovelli (10 co-authored works)
  • Alessandra Del Felice (9 co-authored works)
  • Stefano Vicentin (9 co-authored works)
  • Giorgia Cona (8 co-authored works)

Their recent publications cover a range of topics within neuroscience and related areas. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Cognitive impairment in people with previous COVID-19 infection: A scoping review," 2022, Cortex
  • "Asymmetric Dopamine Transporter Loss Affects Cognitive and Motor Progression in Parkinson's Disease," 2021, Movement Disorders
  • "Structural and functional brain asymmetries in the early phases of life: a scoping review," 2021, Brain Structure and Function
  • "Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Past, Present, and Future," 2022, Children
  • "EEG correlates of developmental dyslexia: a systematic review," 2022, Annals of Dyslexia

They have published several papers in various scientific venues. The venues with the highest frequency of publications include:

  • Children
  • PeerJ
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Brain Structure and Function
  • European Journal of Pediatrics

Best Publications

  • is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis

    Ca Marzi;Patrizia Bisiacchi;R. Nicoletti

  • Neural bases of prospective memory: a meta-analysis and the "Attention to Delayed Intention" (AtoDI) model.

    Giorgia Cona;Cristina Scarpazza;Giuseppe Sartori;Morris Moscovitch

  • Esame Neuropsicologico Breve

    Sara Mondini;Daniela Mapelli;Vestri;Patrizia Bisiacchi

  • BVN 5-11 Batteria di valutazione neuropsicologica per l’età evolutiva

    P. S. Bisiacchi;M. Cendron;M. Gugliotta;P. E. Tressoldi

  • The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: behavioural data and neural correlates.

    Patrizia S. Bisiacchi;Sami Schiff;Alessia Ciccola;Matthias Kliegel

  • The effect of aging on auditory components of event-related brain potentials.

    Sami Schiff;Pietro Valenti;Pellegrini Andrea;Maria Lot

  • Selective activation of the superior frontal gyrus in task-switching: an event-related fNIRS study.

    Simone Cutini;Pietro Scatturin;Enrica Menon;Patrizia Silvia Bisiacchi

  • Low-frequency rTMS inhibitory effects in the primary motor cortex: Insights from TMS-evoked potentials.

    Elias P. Casula;Elias P. Casula;Vincenza Tarantino;Demis Basso;Giorgio Arcara

  • It’s a Matter of Mind! Cognitive Functioning Predicts the Athletic Performance in Ultra-Marathon Runners

    Unknown

  • Value and Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Critical Review Since 2000.

    Davide Cappon;Marjan Jahanshahi;Patrizia Bisiacchi

  • Cortical auditory processing in preterm newborns: an ERP study.

    Patrizia Silvia Bisiacchi;Giovanni Mento;Agnese Suppiej

  • Neuropsychological evaluation of neurologically asymptomatic HIV-infected children.

    Patrizia Bisiacchi;Agnese Suppiej;Anna Maria Laverda

  • Improving the Inhibitory Control Task to Detect Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy

    Piero Amodio;Lorenzo Ridola;Sami Schiff;Sara Montagnese

  • Left-Handedness in Fencers: An Attentional Advantage?:

    P. S. Bisiacchi;H. Ripoll;J. F. Stein;P. Simonet

  • Impairment in processing meaningless verbal material in several modalities: the relationship between short-term memory and phonological skills.

    Patrizia S. Bisiacchi;Lisa Cipolotti;Gianfranco Denes

  • Laterality effects, levels of processing, and stimulus properties.

    Simion F;Bagnara S;Bisiacchi P;Roncato S

  • The role of prefrontal cortex in visuo-spatial planning: A repetitive TMS study.

    Demis Basso;Martin Lotze;Lavinia Vitale;Florinda Ferreri

  • Adult age differences, response management, and cue focality in event-based prospective memory: a meta-analysis on the role of task order specificity.

    Andreas Ihle;Alexandra Hering;Caitlin E. V. Mahy;Patrizia S. Bisiacchi

  • Automatic temporal expectancy: a high-density event-related potential study.

    Giovanni Mento;Vincenza Tarantino;Michela Sarlo;Patrizia Silvia Bisiacchi

  • Interplay between memory and executive functions in normal and pathological aging.

    Patrizia S. Bisiacchi;Erika Borella;Susanna Bergamaschi;Barbara Carretti

  • Gender differences in visuospatial planning: An eye movements study

    Valentina Cazzato;Demis Basso;Simone Cutini;Patrizia Bisiacchi

  • Perspectives on cognitive neuropsychology

    G. Denes;C. Semenza;Patrizia Bisiacchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlo Semenza
Carlo Semenza University of Padua
Angelo Gatta
Angelo Gatta University of Padua
Antonino Vallesi
Antonino Vallesi University of Padua
Lisa Cipolotti
Lisa Cipolotti University College London
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Maria Cotelli
Maria Cotelli University of Brescia
Steven J. Schiff
Steven J. Schiff Yale University
Giovanni Sparacino
Giovanni Sparacino University of Padua
Daniela Mapelli
Daniela Mapelli University of Padua
Marco Zorzi
Marco Zorzi University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially in the field of counseling. Online psychology degrees offer flexibility, allowing students to pursue specializations like substance abuse counseling while balancing work and personal commitments.

If you're considering a career as a substance abuse counselor, it's important to note that requirements vary by city and state. For example, you can review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Portland to see what education and certification steps are needed there. Similarly, those interested in working elsewhere can explore the substance abuse counselor requirements in Raleigh, as well as the substance abuse counselor requirements in Reno.

Each region can have unique licensure processes, practical experience standards, and ongoing education expectations. As a further example, review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Richmond for another perspective.

By understanding the diverse requirements and pathways, students can better plan their educational journey and career trajectory in the expanding field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Patrizia Bisiacchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles