World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
7019
World Ranking
6261
National Ranking
501

Patrick N. Anderson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick N. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 110 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Patrick N. Anderson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick N. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick N. Anderson is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their academic career is connected to this institution, which is known for its diverse research environment.

There are no specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields of study listed for Patrick N. Anderson. Consequently, no particular research topics or subfields can be identified from the available data.

Without records of recent publications, it is not possible to detail research themes or contributions in scientific literature. Similarly, no awards or recognitions have been documented for this scientist.

This profile is based on the currently available information and does not include subjective evaluation or additional details beyond the source data provided.

Best Publications

  • Blocking connexin43 expression reduces inflammation and improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury.

    Michael Cronin;Patrick N. Anderson;Jeremy E. Cook;Colin R. Green

  • The Nogo receptor, its ligands and axonal regeneration in the spinal cord; a review.

    D. Hunt;R.S. Coffin;P.N. Anderson

  • Dorsally and Ventrally Derived Oligodendrocytes Have Similar Electrical Properties but Myelinate Preferred Tracts

    Tripathi Rb;Clarke Le;Burzomato;Kessaris N

  • Activating transcription factor 3 and the nervous system

    David Hunt;Gennadij Raivich;Patrick Norval Anderson

  • Peripheral nerve injury fails to induce growth of lesioned ascending dorsal column axons into spinal cord scar tissue expressing the axon repellent Semaphorin3A.

    R.J. Pasterkamp;P.N. Anderson;J. Verhaagen

  • Corticospinal neurons up‐regulate a range of growth‐associated genes following intracortical, but not spinal, axotomy

    M R J Mason;A R Lieberman;P N Anderson

  • Multiple immediate-early gene-deficient herpes simplex virus vectors allowing efficient gene delivery to neurons in culture and widespread gene delivery to the central nervous system in vivo.

    Caroline E. Lilley;Filitsa Groutsi;ZiQun Han;James A. Palmer

  • Satellite cells surrounding axotomised rat dorsal root ganglion cells increase expression of a GFAP-like protein.

    P. Woodham;P.N. Anderson;W. Nadim;M. Turmaine

  • The effects of FK506 on dorsal column axons following spinal cord injury in adult rats: neuroprotection and local regeneration.

    Bavetta S;Hamlyn Pj;Burnstock G;Lieberman Ar

  • Nogo Receptor mRNA Expression in Intact and Regenerating CNS Neurons

    David Hunt;M.R.J. Mason;G. Campbell;R. Coffin

  • Transcriptional upregulation of SCG10 and CAP-23 is correlated with regeneration of the axons of peripheral and central neurons in vivo.

    Matthew R J Mason;A R Lieberman;G Grenningloh;P N Anderson

  • Regulation of Nogo and Nogo receptor during the development of the entorhino-hippocampal pathway and after adult hippocampal lesions.

    Ana Mingorance;Xavier Fontana;Marta Solé;Ferran Burgaya

  • Axonal regeneration from CNS neurons in the cerebellum and brainstem of adult rats: correlation with the patterns of expression and distribution of messenger RNAs for L1, CHL1, c-jun and growth-associated protein-43.

    V Chaisuksunt;Y Zhang;P.N Anderson;G Campbell

  • Axonal regeneration from injured dorsal roots into the spinal cord of adult rats.

    M.S. Chong;C.J. Woolf;N.S.K. Haque;P.N. Anderson

  • The effects of a lesion or a peripheral nerve graft on GAP-43 upregulation in the adult rat brain: an in situ hybridization and immunocytochemical study

    E Vaudano;G Campbell;PN Anderson;AP Davies

  • NT-3 delivered by an adenoviral vector induces injured dorsal root axons to regenerate into the spinal cord of adult rats.

    Yi Zhang;Paul A. Dijkhuizen;Patrick N. Anderson;A. Robert Lieberman

  • Cellular and molecular correlates of the regeneration of adult mammalian CNS axons into peripheral nerve grafts

    P.N. Anderson;G. Campbell;Y. Zhang;A.R. Lieberman

  • Efficient delivery of Cre-recombinase to neurons in vivo and stable transduction of neurons using adeno-associated and lentiviral vectors

    Bushra Y Ahmed;Sridhara Chakravarthy;Ruben Eggers;Wim T J M C Hermens

  • Expression of CHL1 and L1 by neurons and glia following sciatic nerve and dorsal root injury.

    Y. Zhang;R. Roslan;D. Lang;M. Schachner

  • Regeneration-enhancing effects of EphA4 blocking peptide following corticospinal tract injury in adult rat spinal cord.

    Jez Fabes;Patrick Anderson;Caroline Brennan;Stephen Bolsover

  • Intrinsic versus extrinsic factors in determining the regeneration of the central processes of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons: the influence of a peripheral nerve graft.

    M.S. Chong;C.J. Woolf;M. Turmaine;P.C. Emson

Frequent Co-Authors

Melitta Schachner
Melitta Schachner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Adrian J. Thrasher
Adrian J. Thrasher University College London
Robert S. Coffin
Robert S. Coffin University College London
Geoffrey Burnstock
Geoffrey Burnstock University College London
Joost Verhaagen
Joost Verhaagen Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
David S. Latchman
David S. Latchman University College London
Clifford J. Woolf
Clifford J. Woolf Boston Children's Hospital
Gerta Vrbová
Gerta Vrbová University College London
Jonathan D. Cooper
Jonathan D. Cooper Washington University in St. Louis
Rudolf Martini
Rudolf Martini University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Patrick N. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles