World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
9194
World Ranking
5517
National Ranking
2018

Pamela L. Nagler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela L. Nagler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Pamela L. Nagler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela L. Nagler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pamela L. Nagler is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and specializes in Environmental Science, with a focus on areas including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, and Water Science and Technology. Their research spans subfields such as Environmental Engineering and Atmospheric Science, contributing to a broad understanding of environmental processes.

Their main research topics cover Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, and Remote Sensing in Agriculture. Other topics include Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Rangeland and Wildlife Management, Tree-ring Climate Responses, and Hydrology and Drought Analysis.

Pamela L. Nagler's recent publications include:

  • Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta, 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • Effect of spatial resolution of satellite images on estimating the greenness and evapotranspiration of urban green spaces, 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • Climate sensitivity of water use by riparian woodlands at landscape scales, 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration over Croplands Using Vegetation Index Methods and Dynamic Harvested Area, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • Mapping Vegetation Index-Derived Actual Evapotranspiration across Croplands Using the Google Earth Engine Platform, 2023, Remote Sensing

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated multiple times with Pamela L. Nagler include:

  • Kamel Didan
  • Armando Barreto-Muñoz
  • Hamideh Nouri
  • Sattar Chavoshi Borujeni
  • Martha Gómez-Sapiens

Publication venues where Pamela L. Nagler has contributed extensively are:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Ecological Engineering
  • Nature Sustainability

Best Publications

  • Relationship Between Remotely-sensed Vegetation Indices, Canopy Attributes and Plant Physiological Processes: What Vegetation Indices Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Landscape.

    Edward P. Glenn;Alfredo R. Huete;Pamela L. Nagler;Stephen G. Nelson

  • Integrating Remote Sensing and Ground Methods to Estimate Evapotranspiration

    Edward P. Glenn;Alfredo R. Huete;Pamela L. Nagler;Katherine K. Hirschboeck

  • Evapotranspiration on western U.S. rivers estimated using the Enhanced Vegetation Index from MODIS and data from eddy covariance and Bowen ratio flux towers

    Pamela L. Nagler;Russell L. Scott;Craig Westenburg;James R. Cleverly

  • Plant Litter and Soil Reflectance

    P.L. Nagler;C.S.T. Daughtry;S.N. Goward

  • Remote sensing of dryland ecosystem structure and function: Progress, challenges, and opportunities

    William K. Smith;Matthew P. Dannenberg;Matthew P. Dannenberg;Dong Yan;Stephanie Herrmann

  • Predicting riparian evapotranspiration from MODIS vegetation indices and meteorological data

    Pamela L. Nagler;James Cleverly;Edward Glenn;Derrick Lampkin

  • Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western U.S. riparian zones

    Edward P. Glenn;Pamela L. Nagler

  • Vegetation Index Methods for Estimating Evapotranspiration by Remote Sensing

    Edward P. Glenn;Pamela L. Nagler;Alfredo R. Huete;Alfredo R. Huete

  • Vegetation index-based crop coefficients to estimate evapotranspiration by remote sensing in agricultural and natural ecosystems

    Edward P. Glenn;Christopher M. U. Neale;Doug J. Hunsaker;Pamela L. Nagler

  • Cellulose absorption index (CAI) to quantify mixed soil-plant litter scenes

    Pamela L Nagler;Y Inoue;E.P Glenn;A.L Russ

  • Estimating basin scale evapotranspiration (ET) by water balance and remote sensing methods

    G. B. Senay;S. Leake;P. L. Nagler;G. Artan

  • Changing Perceptions of Change: The Role of Scientists in Tamarix and River Management

    Juliet C. Stromberg;Matthew K. Chew;Pamela L. Nagler;Edward P. Glenn

  • Buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare) land conversion and productivity in the plains of Sonora, Mexico

    Kim A. Franklin;Kelly Lyons;Pamela L. Nagler;Derrick Lampkin

  • High Spatial Resolution WorldView-2 Imagery for Mapping NDVI and Its Relationship to Temporal Urban Landscape Evapotranspiration Factors

    Hamideh Nouri;Simon Beecham;Sharolyn Anderson;Pamela L. Nagler;Pamela L. Nagler

  • Leaf area index and normalized difference vegetation index as predictors of canopy characteristics and light interception by riparian species on the Lower Colorado River

    Pamela L. Nagler;Edward P. Glenn;T. Lewis Thompson;Alfredo Huete

  • Ecology and conservation biology of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico

    Edward P. Glenn;Francisco Zamora-Arroyo;Pamela L. Nagler;Mark Briggs

  • Relationship between evapotranspiration and precipitation pulses in a semiarid rangeland estimated by moisture flux towers and MODIS vegetation indices

    P.L. Nagler;E.P. Glenn;H. Kim;W. Emmerich

  • Multiyear riparian evapotranspiration and groundwater use for a semiarid watershed

    R.L. Scott;W.L. Cable;T.E. Huxman;P.L. Nagler

  • Roles of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) and capillary rise in salinizing a non-flooding terrace on a flow-regulated desert river

    E.P. Glenn;K. Morino;Pamela L. Nagler;R.S. Murray

  • Comparison of transpiration rates among saltcedar, cottonwood and willow trees by sap flow and canopy temperature methods

    Pamela L Nagler;Edward P Glenn;T Lewis Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward P. Glenn
Edward P. Glenn University of Arizona
Kevin R. Hultine
Kevin R. Hultine Desert Botanical Garden
Alfredo Huete
Alfredo Huete University of Technology Sydney
Russell L. Scott
Russell L. Scott Agricultural Research Service
Philip E. Dennison
Philip E. Dennison University of Utah
Paul C. Sutton
Paul C. Sutton University of Denver
Patrick B. Shafroth
Patrick B. Shafroth United States Geological Survey
Simon Beecham
Simon Beecham University of South Australia
Craig S. T. Daughtry
Craig S. T. Daughtry Agricultural Research Service
James R. Ehleringer
James R. Ehleringer University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students consider the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get to find programs that align well with their interests and current skills, easing the transition into environmental studies.

Online programs in geoscience and geology provide strong foundational knowledge important for understanding Earth systems. The online geoscience degree options offer flexibility for working professionals, allowing them to gain specialized expertise in areas like soil, water, and mineral sciences.

Another promising field for Environmental Science graduates is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The best GIS graduate programs teach essential skills in spatial data analysis and mapping, which are crucial for environmental planning and resource management careers.

For those looking to combine environmental knowledge with leadership and policy skills, programs such as the best online masters in public administration provide training in public sector management, preparing graduates for roles in environmental policy, sustainability initiatives, and community development.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela L. Nagler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles