World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
13003
World Ranking
9960
National Ranking
303

Pablo Moscato publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pablo Moscato sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 198 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pablo Moscato D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pablo Moscato sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pablo Moscato is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia and contributes predominantly to the field of Computer Science. Their research spans various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, and Computer Networks and Communications. The body of work notably covers topics in Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications, Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research, Neural Networks and Applications, as well as interdisciplinary studies involving Tryptophan and brain disorders, Vitamin D Research Studies, and Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response.

They have published extensively in a range of academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Research Square (4 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (3 publications)
  • Expert Systems with Applications (2 publications)
  • Memetic Computing (2 publications)
  • Algorithms (2 publications)

Their recent papers illustrate a blend of computational methods and applied scientific research. Recent works include:

  • "Differential kynurenine pathway metabolism in highly metastatic aggressive breast cancer subtypes: beyond IDO1-induced immunosuppression" (2020) published in Breast Cancer Research
  • "Analytic Continued Fractions for Regression: A Memetic Algorithm Approach" (2021) published in Expert Systems with Applications
  • "Semi-supervised and unsupervised anomaly detection by mining numerical workflow relations from system logs" (2022) published in Automated Software Engineering
  • "M-Link: a link clustering memetic algorithm for overlapping community detection" (2020) published in Memetic Computing
  • "Multiple regression techniques for modelling dates of first performances of Shakespeare-era plays" (2022) published in Expert Systems with Applications

Collaborations are a notable aspect of Pablo Moscato's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mohammad Nazmul Haque (12 co-authored papers)
  • Nasimul Noman (4 co-authored papers)
  • Andrew Ciezak (4 co-authored papers)
  • Rafael Bartnik Grebogi (4 co-authored papers)
  • Benjamin Heng (2 co-authored papers)

Their research contributions reveal a strong inclination toward developing and applying memetic algorithms and evolutionary computation techniques. The interdisciplinary applications extend toward biological and medical domains, as evidenced by work related to cancer metabolomics and immune response research.

Overall, Pablo Moscato's work integrates computational theory, algorithm development, and applied sciences, with a substantial emphasis on optimization methods, neural networks, and complex network analysis techniques.

Best Publications

  • On Evolution, Search, Optimization, Genetic Algorithms and Martial Arts : Towards Memetic Algorithms

    P. Moscato

  • New Ideas In Optimization

    David Corne;Marco Dorigo;Fred Glover;Dipankar Dasgupta

  • Memetic algorithms: a short introduction

    Pablo Moscato

  • Genome-wide analysis of long noncoding RNA stability

    Michael B. Clark;Rebecca L. Johnston;Mario Inostroza-Ponta;Archa H. Fox

  • A Gentle Introduction to Memetic Algorithms

    Pablo Moscato;Carlos Cotta

  • Handbook of Memetic Algorithms

    Ferrante Neri;Carlos Cotta;Pablo Moscato

  • On the Rank of Extreme Matrices in Semidefinite Programs and the Multiplicity of Optimal Eigenvalues

    Pablo Moscato;Michael G. Norman;Gabor Pataki

  • Basal-like breast cancer: molecular profiles, clinical features and survival outcomes

    Heloisa H. Milioli;Inna Tishchenko;Carlos Riveros;Regina Berretta

  • A memetic algorithm for the total tardiness single machine scheduling problem

    Paulo M França;Alexandre Mendes;Pablo Moscato

  • Common variants at 6p21.1 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic stroke.

    Elizabeth G Holliday;Jane M Maguire;Jane M Maguire;Tiffany-jane Evans;Simon A Koblar;Simon A Koblar

  • Evolutionary algorithms for scheduling a flowshop manufacturing cell with sequence dependent family setups

    Paulo M. França;Jatinder N. D. Gupta;Alexandre S. Mendes;Pablo Moscato

  • Uncovering Molecular Biomarkers That Correlate Cognitive Decline with the Changes of Hippocampus' Gene Expression Profiles in Alzheimer's Disease

    Martín Gómez Ravetti;Martín Gómez Ravetti;Martín Gómez Ravetti;Osvaldo A. Rosso;Osvaldo A. Rosso;Osvaldo A. Rosso;Regina Berretta;Regina Berretta;Pablo Moscato;Pablo Moscato;Pablo Moscato

  • Blood metabolite markers of preclinical Alzheimer's disease in two longitudinally followed cohorts of older individuals.

    Ramon Casanova;Sudhir Varma;Brittany Simpson;Brittany Simpson;Min Gyu Kim

  • A New Memetic Algorithm for the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem

    Luciana Buriol;Paulo M. França;Pablo Moscato

  • A Modern Introduction to Memetic Algorithms

    Pablo Moscato;Carlos Cotta

  • Identification of a 5-Protein Biomarker Molecular Signature for Predicting Alzheimer's Disease

    Martín Gómez Ravetti;Pablo Moscato

  • Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes through Integrated Study of Alzheimer's Disease Affected Brain Regions.

    Nisha Puthiyedth;Carlos Riveros;Regina Berretta;Pablo Moscato

  • Stochastic versus deterministic update in simulated annealing

    Pablo Moscato;J.F. Fontanari

  • An introduction to population approaches for optimization and hierarchical objective functions: a discussion on the role of tabu search

    Pablo Moscato

  • Comparing meta-heuristic approaches for parallel machine scheduling problems

    Alexandre S. Mendes;Felipe M. Müller;Paulo M. França;Pablo Moscato

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos Cotta
Carlos Cotta University of Malaga
Rodney J. Scott
Rodney J. Scott University of Newcastle Australia
Osvaldo A. Rosso
Osvaldo A. Rosso National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Graeme J. Stewart
Graeme J. Stewart University of Sydney
Matthew A. Brown
Matthew A. Brown Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
James S. Wiley
James S. Wiley University of Melbourne
Lyn R. Griffiths
Lyn R. Griffiths Queensland University of Technology
David R. Booth
David R. Booth University of Sydney
Melanie Bahlo
Melanie Bahlo Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Elizabeth G. Holliday
Elizabeth G. Holliday University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, a variety of related online computer science degree options offer flexible, accessible ways to launch or advance your career. Many online programs are tailored for working adults seeking to fast-track their studies while balancing other commitments.

Worried about previous academic performance? There are reputable online schools that accept low gpa, providing opportunities for students from diverse backgrounds to pursue higher education.

Computer Science skills are highly transferrable and open doors in fields like environmental science and engineering. Curious about environmental careers? Explore what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree to see how your technical expertise can have a global impact.

Interested in sustainability and technology? Consider specialized programs such as an environmental engineering degree, often available online and at an affordable cost. With so many academic and career pathways, advancing in computer science has never been more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Pablo Moscato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles