World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10301 9643 79 76 151 3655

Nina Lindberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nina Lindberg between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nina Lindberg published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2015. 8 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2015. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
2002 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nina Lindberg: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 6
2004 7
2005 5
2006 7
2007 1
2008 3
2009 8
2010 6
2011 3
2012 7
2013 11
2014 6
2015 17
2016 15
2017 13
2018 9
2019 11
2020 10
2021 13
2022 6
2023 4
2024 4
2025 4
Total 177
Download as CSV

Nina Lindberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Lindberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nina Lindberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Lindberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nina Lindberg is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and psychology, with significant contributions to subfields such as clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, epidemiology, neurology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including schizophrenia research and treatment, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry and sexual offending, bipolar disorder and treatment, healthcare decision-making and restraints, and alcoholism and thiamine deficiency.

They have published multiple articles in prominent academic journals. Some recent papers include:

  • Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries (2020, European Psychiatry)
  • The impact of rare protein coding genetic variation on adult cognitive function (2023, Nature Genetics)
  • Incidence and mortality of alcohol-related dementia and Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome: A nationwide register study (2022, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry)
  • Criminal Behavior in the Four Years Preceding Diagnosis of Neurocognitive Disorder: A Nationwide Register Study in Finland (2020, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry)
  • The predictive capacity of AUDIT and AUDIT-C among adolescents in a one-year follow-up study (2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Jaana Suvisaari (20 joint publications)
  • Jari Tiihonen (14 joint publications)
  • Erkki Isometsä (12 joint publications)
  • Risto Vataja (10 joint publications)
  • Tiina Talaslahti (10 joint publications)

Nina Lindberg has published extensively in venues such as the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Brain Sciences, Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, European Psychiatry, and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Best Publications

  • Two years of gender identity service for minors: overrepresentation of natal girls with severe problems in adolescent development.

    Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino;Maria Sumia;Marja Työläjärvi;Nina Lindberg

  • Body dissatisfaction and body mass in girls and boys transitioning from early to mid-adolescence: additional role of self-esteem and eating habits.

    Mauno Mäkinen;Leena-Riitta Puukko-Viertomies;Nina Lindberg;Martti A Siimes

  • Insomnia is a frequent finding in adults with Asperger syndrome

    Pekka Tani;Nina Lindberg;Taina Nieminen-von Wendt;Lennart von Wendt

  • Looking for pyromania: characteristics of a consecutive sample of Finnish male criminals with histories of recidivist fire-setting between 1973 and 1993.

    Nina Lindberg;Matti M Holi;Pekka Tani;Matti Virkkunen

  • AUDIT and AUDIT-C as screening instruments for alcohol problem use in adolescents.

    Joni Liskola;Joni Liskola;Henna Haravuori;Nina Lindberg;Solja Niemelä

  • Finnish sexual homicides: offence and offender characteristics.

    Helinä Häkkänen-Nyholm;Helinä Häkkänen-Nyholm;Eila Repo-Tiihonen;Nina Lindberg;Stephan Salenius

  • Psychometric properties of the Symptom Checklist-90 in adolescent psychiatric inpatients and age- and gender-matched community youth

    Minna Rytilä-Manninen;Sari Fröjd;Henna Haravuori;Henna Haravuori;Nina Lindberg

  • Gender-Specific Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide: A Nationwide Register-Based Study

    Ghitta Weizmann-Henelius;Matti Grönroos;Hanna Putkonen;Markku Eronen

  • Sleep in young adults with Asperger syndrome.

    Pekka Tani;Nina Lindberg;Taina Nieminen-von Wendt;Lennart von Wendt

  • Sleep among habitually violent offenders with antisocial personality disorder

    Nina Lindberg;Pekka Tani;Björn Appelberg;Dag Stenberg

  • Inverse correlation between severity of psychopathic traits and serum cortisol levels in young adult violent male offenders

    Matti Holi;Laura Auvinen-Lintunen;Nina Lindberg;Pekka Tani

  • MAOA Alters the Effects of Heavy Drinking and Childhood Physical Abuse on Risk for Severe Impulsive Acts of Violence Among Alcoholic Violent Offenders

    Roope Tikkanen;Francesca Ducci;David Goldman;Matti Holi

  • Human impulsive aggression: a sleep research perspective.

    Nina Lindberg;Pekka Tani;Björn Appelberg;Hannu Naukkarinen

  • Asperger syndrome, alexithymia and perception of sleep.

    Pekka Tani;Nina Lindberg;Matti Joukamaa;Taina Nieminen-von Wendt

  • Examination of psychopathy in female homicide offenders--confirmatory factor analysis of the PCL-R.

    Ghitta Weizmann-Henelius;Hanna Putkonen;Matti Grönroos;Nina Lindberg

  • Effect of a single-dose of olanzapine on sleep in healthy females and males.

    Lindberg N;Virkkunen M;Tani P;Appelberg B

  • The mortality of young offenders sentenced to prison and its association with psychiatric disorders: a register study

    Eila S. Sailas;Benjamin Feodoroff;Nina C. Lindberg;Matti E. Virkkunen

  • Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries

    D. Wasserman;G. Apter;Chris Baeken;S. Bailey

  • Gender identities in adolescent population: Methodological issues and prevalence across age groups.

    Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino;Nina Lindberg

  • Forensic psychiatric perspective on criminality associated with intellectual disability: a nationwide register‐based study

    Unknown

  • Quantitative electroencephalographic measures in homicidal men with antisocial personality disorder.

    Nina Lindberg;Pekka Tani;Matti Virkkunen;Tarja Porkka-Heiskanen

  • Higher plasma ACTH levels in adults with Asperger syndrome.

    Pekka Tani;Nina Lindberg;Vallo Matto;Björn Appelberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Mauri Marttunen
Mauri Marttunen University of Helsinki
Matti Virkkunen
Matti Virkkunen University of Helsinki
Jari Tiihonen
Jari Tiihonen Karolinska Institute
Jaana Suvisaari
Jaana Suvisaari Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Erkki Isometsä
Erkki Isometsä University of Helsinki
Tarja Porkka-Heiskanen
Tarja Porkka-Heiskanen University of Helsinki
Jouko Miettunen
Jouko Miettunen Oulu University Hospital
Mika Gissler
Mika Gissler Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Jouko Lönnqvist
Jouko Lönnqvist Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to multiple online degree options and career pathways. Many students consider combining psychology with fields like social work, counseling, or human services. These areas often have overlapping skills and job opportunities, such as case management, therapy, and community outreach.

For those interested in affordable pathways, it's worth exploring regional program costs. For example, the cheapest social work degrees in Boston and the most affordable social work degree programs in California offer options for students prioritizing budget-friendly education. Likewise, learners in the Midwest can investigate the cheapest social work programs in Chicago or affordable social work degrees in Columbus for practical alternatives.

Whether you choose a purely psychological route or a related field like social work, studying online provides flexibility and access to a broad range of specializations. Exploring affordable programs and related disciplines can help you maximize both your educational investment and your future career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Nina Lindberg

Trending Scientists