World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 78 1724 1640 18 18 318 17558

Niels Gregersen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Niels Gregersen between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Niels Gregersen published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2008. 4 of the 383 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2008. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 4 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1968 2025

383 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Niels Gregersen: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 4
1978 4
1979 6
1980 6
1981 3
1982 7
1983 4
1984 3
1985 3
1986 5
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 10
1992 9
1993 9
1994 9
1995 13
1996 12
1997 10
1998 8
1999 15
2000 9
2001 10
2002 8
2003 17
2004 13
2005 7
2006 11
2007 10
2008 27
2009 8
2010 19
2011 18
2012 8
2013 9
2014 9
2015 6
2016 8
2017 11
2018 3
2019 6
2020 3
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 3
2025 1
Total 383
Download as CSV

Niels Gregersen publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels Gregersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 315–324 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 318 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67 318
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Niels Gregersen D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels Gregersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127 78
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Niels Gregersen is affiliated with Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. Their research spans multiple domains primarily in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with significant contributions also in physics and astronomy.

The main fields of study they focus on include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine
  • Physics and Astronomy

Within these fields, Gregersen's subfields of study cover:

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology

Their research topics highlight a range of biochemical and biophysical investigations, particularly:

  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Mechanical and Optical Resonators
  • Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies

Gregersen's recent papers reflect their interdisciplinary work and cover various aspects of metabolism, molecular genetics, and bioenergetics. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Riboflavin Deficiency-Implications for General Human Health and Inborn Errors of Metabolism" (2020), International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Bioenergetic and Proteomic Profiling of Immune Cells in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients: An Exploratory Study" (2021), Biomolecules
  • "Use of Molecular Genetic Analyses in Danish Routine Newborn Screening" (2021), International Journal of Neonatal Screening
  • "Bezafibrate activation of PPAR drives disturbances in mitochondrial redox bioenergetics and decreases the viability of cells from patients with VLCAD deficiency" (2021), Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
  • "Increased antioxidant response in medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: does lipoic acid have a protective role?" (2020), Pediatric Research

Their frequent coauthors illustrate active collaborative research networks involving:

  • Rikke Katrine Jentoft Olsen
  • Luca Vannucci
  • Signe Mosegaard
  • Graziana Dipace

Gregersen's work has been published in several consistent venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Biomolecules
  • International Journal of Neonatal Screening
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

Best Publications

  • α-cardiac actin is a novel disease gene in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Jens Mogensen;Ib C. Klausen;Anders K. Pedersen;Henrik Egeblad

  • Hereditary spastic paraplegia SPG13 is associated with a mutation in the gene encoding the mitochondrial chaperonin Hsp60.

    Jens Jacob Hansen;Alexandra Dürr;Isabelle Cournu-Rebeix;Costa Georgopoulos

  • Oligonucleotide-priming methods for the chromosome-specific labelling of alpha satellite DNA in situ.

    Jørn E. Koch;Steen Kølvraa;Kirsten B. Petersen;Niels Gregersen

  • Protein Misfolding and Human Disease

    Niels Gregersen;Peter Gerd Bross;Søren Vang;Jane Hvarregaard Christensen

  • ETFDH mutations as a major cause of riboflavin-responsive multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenation deficiency

    Rikke K J Olsen;Simon E Olpin;Brage S Andresen;Zofia H Miedzybrodzka

  • Clear Correlation of Genotype with Disease Phenotype in Very–Long-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency

    Brage Storstein Andresen;Brage Storstein Andresen;Simon Olpin;Ben J.H.M. Poorthuis;Hans R. Scholte

  • Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) mutations identified by MS/MS-based prospective screening of newborns differ from those observed in patients with clinical symptoms: identification and characterization of a new, prevalent mutation that results in mild MCAD deficiency.

    Brage Storstein Andresen;Brage Storstein Andresen;Steve F. Dobrowolski;Linda O'Reilly;Joseph Muenzer

  • A sequence variation: 713-8delC in the transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene has higher prevalence in osteoporotic women than in normal women and is associated with very low bone mass in osteoporotic women and increased bone turnover in both osteoporotic and normal women

    B.L. Langdahl;J.Y. Knudsen;H.K. Jensen;N. Gregersen

  • Protein misfolding and degradation in genetic diseases

    Peter Bross;Thomas Juhl Corydon;Brage S. Andresen;Brage S. Andresen;Malene Munk Jørgensen

  • One short well conserved region of Alu-sequences is involved in human gene rearrangements and has homology with prokaryotic chi

    Niels S. Rüdiger;Niels Gregersen;Morten C. Kielland-Brandt

  • Clear relationship between ETF/ETFDH genotype and phenotype in patients with multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenation deficiency.

    Rikke K.J. Olsen;Brage S. Andresen;Brage S. Andresen;Ernst Christensen;Peter Bross

  • In vitro fibroblast studies in a patient with C6-C10-dicarboxylic aciduria: evidence for a defect in general acyl-CoA dehydrogenase.

    S. Kølvraa;N. Gregersen;E. Christensen;N. Hobolth

  • Mutation analysis in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation defects: Exemplified by acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencies, with special focus on genotype-phenotype relationship.

    Niels Gregersen;Brage S. Andresen;Brage S. Andresen;Morten J. Corydon;Thomas J. Corydon

  • Genomic structure of the human mitochondrial chaperonin genes: HSP60 and HSP10 are localised head to head on chromosome 2 separated by a bidirectional promoter

    Jens J Hansen;Peter Bross;Majken Westergaard;Marit Nyholm Nielsen

  • Seemingly Neutral Polymorphic Variants May Confer Immunity to Splicing-Inactivating Mutations: A Synonymous SNP in Exon 5 of MCAD Protects from Deleterious Mutations in a Flanking Exonic Splicing Enhancer

    Karsten Bork Nielsen;Suzette Sørensen;Luca Cartegni;Thomas Juhl Corydon

  • Identification of 13 new mutations in the vasopressin-neurophysin II gene in 17 kindreds with familial autosomal dominant neurohypophyseal diabetes insipidus.

    S. Rittig;G. L. Robertson;C. Siggaard;L. Kovács

  • Protein Misfolding and Cellular Stress: An Overview

    Niels Gregersen;Niels Gregersen;Peter Bross;Peter Bross

  • Protein Misfolding and Disease

    Peter Bross;Niels Gregersen

  • Identification of Four New Mutations in the Short-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase (SCAD) Gene in Two Patients: One of the Variant Alleles, 511C→T, is Present at an Unexpectedly High Frequency in the General Population, as Was the Case for 625G→A, Together Conferring Susceptibility to Ethylmalonic Aciduria

    Niels Gregersen;Vibeke S. Winter;Morten J. Corydon;Thomas J. Corydon

  • The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease: Protein Folding and Misfolding: the Role of Cellular Protein Quality Control Systems in Inherited Disorders

    Peter Bross;Malene Munk Jørgensen;Niels Gregersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Brage S. Andresen
Brage S. Andresen University of Southern Denmark
Peter Bross
Peter Bross Aarhus University
Lars Bolund
Lars Bolund Aarhus University
Steen Kølvraa
Steen Kølvraa Arcedi Biotech
Thomas J. Corydon
Thomas J. Corydon Aarhus University
Jerry Vockley
Jerry Vockley University of Pittsburgh
Hans Eiberg
Hans Eiberg University of Copenhagen
Ronald J.A. Wanders
Ronald J.A. Wanders University of Amsterdam
Uffe Birk Jensen
Uffe Birk Jensen Aarhus University
Arnold W. Strauss
Arnold W. Strauss Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Genetics, there are several flexible online degree options and health science career pathways you can explore in the USA. Many students find that starting with healthcare or science-related programs helps pave the way toward genetics careers.

For those with an RN license, considering an rn to bsn no clinicals pathway offers a streamlined way to advance nursing skills entirely online and without on-campus clinicals. Nurses wishing to reach the highest level of clinical practice may look into the shortest dnp program or the easiest online dnp programs for flexibility and efficiency.

If you're looking for a rapid entry point into healthcare, medical assistant roles are in demand. Some students begin their careers with an accelerated medical assistant program that can be completed in just weeks.

These online options let you build a solid foundation in healthcare, biology, or clinical experience—valuable stepping stones for future specialization or research in genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Niels Gregersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles