World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas J. Corydon

Thomas J. Corydon

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
9501
World Ranking
14600
National Ranking
162

Thomas J. Corydon publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Corydon sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 185 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas J. Corydon D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Corydon sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Corydon is a researcher affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their work spans multiple disciplines within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant focus on medicine. Corydon's research output comprises a substantial number of publications, which contribute to areas such as molecular biology, physiology, ophthalmology, genetics, and cancer research.

Their research addresses key topics related to the biological effects of spaceflight, retinal development and disorders, genetic engineering technologies including CRISPR, and therapeutic approaches such as virus-based gene therapy and radiation therapy. This diverse thematic engagement reflects intersections between basic science and applied biomedical research.

Recent publications by Corydon include:

  • Influence of Microgravity on Apoptosis in Cells, Tissues, and Other Systems In Vivo and In Vitro, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Role of Apoptosis in Wound Healing and Apoptosis Alterations in Microgravity, 2021, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • The Effects of Microgravity on Differentiation and Cell Growth in Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cells, 2020, Stem Cells Translational Medicine
  • The Fight against Cancer by Microgravity: The Multicellular Spheroid as a Metastasis Model, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • An inventory of interactors of the human HSP60/HSP10 chaperonin in the mitochondrial matrix space, 2020, Cell Stress and Chaperones

Corydon has frequently published in several academic venues, with the highest number of contributions appearing in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Additional notable journals include Cells, Stem Cells Translational Medicine, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, and Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development.

The researcher often collaborates with a number of coauthors, prominently including Daniela Grimm, Anne Louise Askou, Marcus Krüger, Manfred Infanger, and Markus Wehland. These collaborations have supported research efforts in areas linked to space biology, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic development.

Best Publications

  • Clear Correlation of Genotype with Disease Phenotype in Very–Long-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency

    Brage Storstein Andresen;Brage Storstein Andresen;Simon Olpin;Ben J.H.M. Poorthuis;Hans R. Scholte

  • The role of SOX family members in solid tumours and metastasis.

    Daniela Grimm;Daniela Grimm;Johann Bauer;Petra Wise;Marcus Krüger

  • Protein misfolding and degradation in genetic diseases

    Peter Bross;Thomas Juhl Corydon;Brage S. Andresen;Brage S. Andresen;Malene Munk Jørgensen

  • Rare versus common variants in pharmacogenetics: SLCO1B1 variation and methotrexate disposition

    Laura B. Ramsey;Gitte H. Bruun;Wenjian Yang;Lisa R. Treviño

  • The impact of microgravity on bone in humans.

    Daniela Grimm;Jirka Grosse;Markus Wehland;Vivek Mann

  • Mutation analysis in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation defects: Exemplified by acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencies, with special focus on genotype-phenotype relationship.

    Niels Gregersen;Brage S. Andresen;Brage S. Andresen;Morten J. Corydon;Thomas J. Corydon

  • Seemingly Neutral Polymorphic Variants May Confer Immunity to Splicing-Inactivating Mutations: A Synonymous SNP in Exon 5 of MCAD Protects from Deleterious Mutations in a Flanking Exonic Splicing Enhancer

    Karsten Bork Nielsen;Suzette Sørensen;Luca Cartegni;Thomas Juhl Corydon

  • Identification of Four New Mutations in the Short-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase (SCAD) Gene in Two Patients: One of the Variant Alleles, 511C→T, is Present at an Unexpectedly High Frequency in the General Population, as Was the Case for 625G→A, Together Conferring Susceptibility to Ethylmalonic Aciduria

    Niels Gregersen;Vibeke S. Winter;Morten J. Corydon;Thomas J. Corydon

  • Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation defects—remaining challenges

    Niels Gregersen;Brage S. Andresen;Christina B. Pedersen;Rikke K. J. Olsen

  • The ACADS gene variation spectrum in 114 patients with short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (SCAD) deficiency is dominated by missense variations leading to protein misfolding at the cellular level

    Christina B. Pedersen;Steen Kølvraa;Agnete Kølvraa;Vibeke Stenbroen

  • Update on the keratoconus genetics.

    Kim Nielsen;Jesper Hjortdal;Maria Pihlmann;Thomas J. Corydon

  • Alterations of the cytoskeleton in human cells in space proved by life-cell imaging.

    Thomas J. Corydon;Sascha Kopp;Markus Wehland;Markus Braun

  • Human Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase-9 Plays a Novel Role in the Mitochondrial β-Oxidation of Unsaturated Fatty Acids

    Regina Ensenauer;Regina Ensenauer;Miao He;Jan Marie Willard;Eric S. Goetzman

  • Clinical and molecular evidence of abnormal processing and trafficking of the vasopressin preprohormone in a large kindred with familial neurohypophyseal diabetes insipidus due to a signal peptide mutation.

    Charlotte Siggaard;Søren Rittig;Thomas J. Corydon;Per Hove Andreasen

  • Inactivation of the hereditary spastic paraplegia-associated Hspd1 gene encoding the Hsp60 chaperone results in early embryonic lethality in mice

    Jane H. Christensen;Jane H. Christensen;Marit N. Nielsen;Jakob Hansen;Annette Füchtbauer

  • Isolated 2-Methylbutyrylglycinuria Caused by Short/Branched-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Identification of a New Enzyme Defect, Resolution of Its Molecular Basis, and Evidence for Distinct Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenases in Isoleucine And Valine Metabolism

    Brage Storstein Andresen;Brage Storstein Andresen;Ernst Christensen;Thomas J. Corydon;Peter Bross

  • The Hsp60-(p.V98I) Mutation Associated with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia SPG13 Compromises Chaperonin Function Both in Vitro and in Vivo

    Peter Bross;Søren Naundrup;Jakob Hansen;Marit Nyholm Nielsen

  • Evidence implicating BRD1 with brain development and susceptibility to both schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder

    Jacob Severinsen;Carsten Bjarkam;Stine Kiær-Larsen;Inger Marie Olsen

  • Decreased expression of the mitochondrial matrix proteases Lon and ClpP in cells from a patient with hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG13).

    J. Hansen;T.J. Corydon;J. Palmfeldt;A. Dürr;A. Dürr

  • Influence of Polymorphic OATP1B-Type Carriers on the Disposition of Docetaxel

    Anne-Joy M. de Graan;Cynthia S. Lancaster;Amanda Obaidat;Bruno Hagenbuch

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels Gregersen
Niels Gregersen Aarhus University Hospital
Daniela Grimm
Daniela Grimm Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Peter Bross
Peter Bross Aarhus University
Brage S. Andresen
Brage S. Andresen University of Southern Denmark
Lars Bolund
Lars Bolund Aarhus University
Anders D. Børglum
Anders D. Børglum Aarhus University
Ole Mors
Ole Mors Aarhus University
Jerry Vockley
Jerry Vockley University of Pittsburgh
Steen Kølvraa
Steen Kølvraa Arcedi Biotech
Manuel Mattheisen
Manuel Mattheisen Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse online degrees and rewarding career paths in the healthcare field. Many students consider nutrition degree programs to complement their science background, offering a fast track into health advisory or clinical roles.

Those interested in leadership positions may pursue an online healthcare MBA to gain essential management skills while focusing on the medical industry.

For careers in medical coding, understanding the differences between ccs vs cpc salary and certification can help guide your professional choices and influence earning potential.

If you’re considering entering this field, you might wonder how much do medical coders make. Salaries vary by role, experience, and credentials, but skilled coders are in high demand across healthcare settings.

Exploring these related pathways can enhance your qualifications and expand your career options in the dynamic science and healthcare sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Corydon

Trending Scientists