World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicholas Malajczuk

Nicholas Malajczuk

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 49 2258 178 137 9256

Nicholas Malajczuk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicholas Malajczuk between 1974 and 2013, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicholas Malajczuk published across 40 years, from 1974 to 2013, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1996. 1 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2013. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1996. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 5 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication
1974 2013

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicholas Malajczuk: publications per year, 1974 to 2013
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 2
1976 0
1977 4
1978 3
1979 6
1980 1
1981 5
1982 5
1983 5
1984 5
1985 3
1986 3
1987 4
1988 4
1989 5
1990 10
1991 4
1992 5
1993 3
1994 5
1995 10
1996 11
1997 2
1998 5
1999 2
2000 8
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 2
2012 0
2013 1
Total 137
Download as CSV

Nicholas Malajczuk publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Malajczuk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 137 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194 137
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Nicholas Malajczuk D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Malajczuk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127 49
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Fungus
  • Ecology

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Mycorrhiza, Ectomycorrhiza, Eucalyptus and Pisolithus. His Botany research integrates issues from Soil water and Plant nutrition. His Mycorrhiza research includes elements of Agronomy, Pasture, Grassland, Trifolium repens and Root system.

His study explores the link between Ectomycorrhiza and topics such as Myrtaceae that cross with problems in Tannin, Hysterangium, Eucalyptus globulus, Hebeloma and Eucalyptus camaldulensis. His Eucalyptus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Agroforestry and Woody plant. His Pisolithus study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Laccaria laccata, Inoculation and Seedling.

His most cited work include:

  • Working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture (960 citations)
  • Ectomycorrhizal formation in Eucalyptus. I. Pure culture synthesis, host specificity and mycorrhizal compatibility with Pinus radiata (153 citations)
  • Underground transfer of nitrogen between pasture plants infected with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (133 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Eucalyptus, Ectomycorrhiza, Mycorrhiza and Inoculation. Nicholas Malajczuk combines subjects such as Pisolithus and Horticulture with his study of Botany. His research integrates issues of Nutrient, Agronomy and Pinus radiata in his study of Eucalyptus.

The various areas that Nicholas Malajczuk examines in his Ectomycorrhiza study include Hysterangium, Laccaria, Mycelium, Laccaria laccata and Fungus. His Mycorrhiza study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Eucalyptus marginata and Agar. The Inoculation study combines topics in areas such as Colonization and Seedling.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (66.98%)
  • Eucalyptus (31.13%)
  • Ectomycorrhiza (30.19%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1996-2013)?

  • Botany (66.98%)
  • Eucalyptus (31.13%)
  • Horticulture (20.75%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Botany, Eucalyptus, Horticulture, Pisolithus and Ectomycorrhiza. Nicholas Malajczuk interconnects Nutrient, Laccaria and Scleroderma in the investigation of issues within Botany. His Eucalyptus research incorporates themes from Productivity, Agronomy, Human fertilization and Myrtaceae.

His Horticulture study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Ectosymbiosis and Spore. His Pisolithus research focuses on Sporocarp and how it relates to Introduced species, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Spore germination and Germination. His Ectomycorrhiza study introduces a deeper knowledge of Mycorrhiza.

Between 1996 and 2013, his most popular works were:

  • The diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with introduced Pinus spp. in the Southern Hemisphere, with particular reference to Western Australia (67 citations)
  • Effects of bacteria on mycorrhizal development and growth of container grown Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell. seedlings (58 citations)
  • Mycorrhiza formation and growth of Eucalyptus globulus seedlings inoculated with spores of various ectomycorrhizal fungi (45 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Fungus
  • Ecology

Nicholas Malajczuk mainly focuses on Botany, Ectomycorrhiza, Laccaria, Mycorrhiza and Pisolithus. Nicholas Malajczuk frequently studies issues relating to Scleroderma and Botany. His Ectomycorrhiza research includes themes of Rhizobacteria, Eucalyptus globulus, Shoot, Eucalyptus diversicolor and Laccaria laccata.

His Eucalyptus globulus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Basidiocarp, Nutrient cycle and Plant litter. His work focuses on many connections between Dry weight and other disciplines, such as Nutrient, that overlap with his field of interest in Agronomy. His Pinus radiata research integrates issues from Flora, Ectosymbiosis and Hebeloma crustuliniforme.

Best Publications

  • Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture.

    Mark Brundrett;Neale Bougher;Bernie Dell;Tim Grove

  • Ectomycorrhizal formation in Eucalyptus. I. Pure culture synthesis, host specificity and mycorrhizal compatibility with Pinus radiata

    Nicholas Malajczuk;Randy Molina;James M. Trappe

  • Underground transfer of nitrogen between pasture plants infected with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

    A. Haystead;N. Malajczuk;T. S. Grove

  • Nutrient Disorders in Plantation Eucalypts

    B. Dell;N. Malajczuk;D. Xu;T. S. Grove

  • Growth and phosphorus acquisition of karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.) seedlings inoculated with ectomycorrhizal fungi in relation to phosphorus supply.

    N. L. Bougher;T. S. Grove;N. Malajczuk

  • Variation in mycorrhizal development and growth stimulation by 20 Pisolithus isolates inoculated on to Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden

    T. Burgess;B. Dell;N. Malajczuk

  • ACCUMULATION OF CALCIUM OXALATE IN THE MANTLE OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL ROOTS OF PINUS RADIATA AND EUCALYPTUS MARGINATA

    N. Malajczuk;K. Cromack

  • Infectivity of pine and eucalypt isolates of Pisolithus tinctorius on roots of Eucalyptus urophylla in vitro. 1. Mycorrhiza formation in model systems

    N. Malajczuk;F. Lapeyrie;J. Garbaye

  • The ability of 16 ectomycorrhizal fungi to increase growth and phosphorus uptake of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. and E. diversicolor F. Muell.

    T. I. Burgess;N. Malajczuk;T. S. Grove

  • Recolonisation of rehabilitated bauxite mine sites in western Australia by mycorrhizal fungi

    J.H. Gardner;N. Malajczuk

  • The effectiveness of ectomycorrhizal fungi in increasing the growth of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. in relation to root colonization and hyphal development in soil

    B. D. Thomson;T. S. Grove;N. Malajczuk;G.E. St J. Hardy

  • The Jarrah forest : a complex Mediterranean ecosystem

    B. Dell;J.J. Havel;N. Malajczuk

  • Ectomycorrhiza formation in Eucalyptus.: IV. Ectomycorrhizas in the sporocarps of the hypogeous fungi Mesophellia and Castorium in Eucalypt forests of Western Australia.

    B. Dell;N. Malajczuk;T. S. Grove;G. Thomson

  • Effects of fire on the growth, nutrient content and rate of nitrogen fixation of the cycad Macrozamia riedlei.

    TS Grove;AM O'connell;N Malajczuk

  • The diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with introduced Pinus spp. in the Southern Hemisphere, with particular reference to Western Australia

    W.A. Dunstan;B. Dell;N. Malajczuk

  • Variation in Pisolithus based on basidiome and basidiospore morphology, culture characteristics and analysis of polypeptides using 1D SDS-PAGE

    Treena Burgess;Nicholas Malajczuk;Bernard Dell

  • Ectomycorrhiza formation in Eucalyptus. II: The Ultrastructure of compatible and incompatible mycorrhizal fungi and associated roots

    N. Malajczuk;R. Molina;J. M. Trappe

  • The Jarrah Forest

    B. Dell;J. J. Havel;N. Malajczuk

  • Formation of mycorrhizae by jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Smith) in litter and soil.

    P Reddell;N Malajczuk

  • Infectivity of pine and eucalypt isolates of Pisolithus tinctorius (Pers.) Coker & Couch on roots of Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake in vitro

    J. Lei;F. Lapeyrie;N. Malajczuk;J. Dexheimer

  • Effects of bacteria on mycorrhizal development and growth of container grown Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell. seedlings

    W. A. Dunstan;N. Malajczuk;B. Dell

  • The Jarrah Forest: A Complex Mediterranean Ecosystem.

    P. J. Grubb;B. Dell;J. J. Havel;N. Malajczuk

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard Dell
Bernard Dell Murdoch University
Treena I. Burgess
Treena I. Burgess Murdoch University
Yinglong Chen
Yinglong Chen University of Western Australia
Mark Brundrett
Mark Brundrett University of Western Australia
James M. Trappe
James M. Trappe Oregon State University
Randy Molina
Randy Molina Oregon State University
Arthur J. McComb
Arthur J. McComb Murdoch University
Jen A. McComb
Jen A. McComb Murdoch University
Jean Garbaye
Jean Garbaye INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Saisamorn Lumyong
Saisamorn Lumyong Chiang Mai University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Malajczuk

Recently Published Articles