World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4393
World Ranking
12251
National Ranking
4964

Neal H. Clinthorne publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal H. Clinthorne sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 178 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Neal H. Clinthorne D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal H. Clinthorne sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Optics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Algorithm

His primary areas of study are Optics, Detector, Tomography, Iterative reconstruction and Algorithm. His study in Full width at half maximum and Aperture is carried out as part of his studies in Optics. Neal H. Clinthorne has researched Detector in several fields, including Image resolution, Compton scattering, Photon, Electronic engineering and Monte Carlo method.

His Tomography study incorporates themes from Positron emission tomography, Single-photon emission computed tomography, Nuclear medicine and Penalty method. His research in Iterative reconstruction intersects with topics in Pixel, Iterative method, Circulant matrix and Interpolation. His study in the field of Cramér–Rao bound is also linked to topics like Essential matrix.

His most cited work include:

  • Accuracy of Implant Placement with a Stereolithographic Surgical Guide (360 citations)
  • Myocardial Imaging with a Radioiodinated Norepinephrine Storage Analog (351 citations)
  • Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction (206 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Optics, Detector, Image resolution, Iterative reconstruction and Photon. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Monte Carlo method and Optics. His work carried out in the field of Detector brings together such families of science as Scanner, Artificial intelligence, Silicon and Computer vision.

His Image resolution study deals with Positron intersecting with Nuclear magnetic resonance. His Iterative reconstruction research includes themes of Pixel, Single-photon emission computed tomography, Expectation–maximization algorithm, Algorithm and Tomography. His Photon research integrates issues from Energy and Scattering.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Optics (53.81%)
  • Detector (50.22%)
  • Image resolution (34.53%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2018)?

  • Detector (50.22%)
  • Optics (53.81%)
  • Image resolution (34.53%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Neal H. Clinthorne mostly deals with Detector, Optics, Image resolution, Nuclear medicine and Resolution. His Detector study combines topics in areas such as Imaging phantom, Medical physics, Full width at half maximum and Silicon. Neal H. Clinthorne interconnects STRIPS and Diode in the investigation of issues within Optics.

His work deals with themes such as Region of interest and Biomedical engineering, which intersect with Image resolution. The concepts of his Nuclear medicine study are interwoven with issues in Bremsstrahlung and Head and neck. The various areas that Neal H. Clinthorne examines in his Resolution study include Pet scanner and Energy.

Between 2009 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • The AX-PET demonstrator—Design, construction and characterization (30 citations)
  • Timing performance of the silicon PET insert probe. (14 citations)
  • Silicon as an Unconventional Detector in Positron Emission Tomography. (13 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Optics
  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence

His primary areas of investigation include Optics, Detector, Lyso-, Image resolution and STRIPS. His studies in Optics integrate themes in fields like Energy and Iterative reconstruction. In the field of Iterative reconstruction, his study on Tomographic reconstruction overlaps with subjects such as Insert.

His research on Detector concerns the broader Electrical engineering. In Lyso-, Neal H. Clinthorne works on issues like Diode, which are connected to Phase, Cardinal point, Transducer, Tracking and Silicon. His Image resolution research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Imaging phantom and Scanner.

Best Publications

  • Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction

    J.A. Fessler;E.P. Ficaro;N.H. Clinthorne;K. Lange

  • List-mode maximum likelihood reconstruction of Compton scatter camera images in nuclear medicine

    S.J. Wilderman;N.H. Clinthorne;J.A. Fessler;W.L. Rogers

  • SPECT dual-energy-window Compton correction : Scatter multiplier required for quantification

    K. F. Koral;F. M. Swailem;S. Buchbinder;N. H. Clinthorne

  • Maximum-likelihood dual-energy tomographic image reconstruction

    Jeffrey A. Fessler;Idris A. Elbakri;Predrag Sukovic;Neal H. Clinthorne

  • Improved modeling of system response in list mode EM reconstruction of Compton scatter camera images

    S.J. Wilderman;J.A. Fessler;N.H. Clinthorne;J.W. LeBlanc

  • Regularized emission image reconstruction using imperfect side information

    J.A. Fessler;N.H. Clinthorne;W.L. Rogers

  • Model-based estimation for dynamic cardiac studies using ECT

    Ping-Chun Chiao;W.L. Rogers;N.H. Clinthorne;J.A. Fessler

  • C-SPRINT: a prototype Compton camera system for low energy gamma ray imaging

    J.W. LeBlanc;N.H. Clinthorne;C.-H. Hua;E. Nygard

  • SPRINT II: a second generation single photon ring tomograph

    W.L. Rogers;N.H. Clinthorne;L. Shao;P. Chiao

  • 3D image reconstruction for a Compton SPECT camera model

    A.C. Sauve;A.O. Hero;W.L. Rogers;S.J. Wilderman

  • Field-Flood Requirements for Emission Computed Tomography with an Anger Camera

    W. L. Rogers;N. H. Clinthorne;B. A. Harkness;K. F. Koral

  • High spatial resolution x-ray computed tomography (ct) system

    Neal H. Clinthorne;Predrag Sukovic

  • A Hybrid Maximum Likelihood Position Computer for Scintillation Cameras

    Neal H. Clinthorne;W. Leslie Rogers;Lingxiong Shao;Kenneth F. Koral

  • On complete-data spaces for PET reconstruction algorithms

    J.A. Fessler;N.H. Clinthorne;W.L. Rogers

  • High spatial resolution X-ray computed tomography (CT) method and system

    Neal H. Clinthorne;Predrag Sukovic

  • Potential of a Compton camera for high performance scintimammography.

    Lisha Zhang;W Leslie Rogers;Neal H Clinthorne

  • A modified uniform Cramer-Rao bound for multiple pinhole aperture design

    L.J. Meng;N.H. Clinthorne

  • Method, processor and computed tomography (ct) machine for generating images utilizing high and low sensitivity data collected from a flat panel detector having an extended dynamic range

    Neal H. Clinthorne;Predrag Sukovic

  • SPRINT: A Stationary Detector Single Photon Ring Tomograph for Brain Imaging

    W. L. Rogers;N. H. Clinthorne;J. Stamos;K. F. Koral

  • Silicon detector for a Compton camera in nuclear medical imaging

    D. Meier;A. Czermak;P. Jalocha;B. Sowicki

  • Regularized Emission Image ReconstructionUsing Imperfect Side Information

    Jeffrey A. Fessler;Neal H. Clinthorne;W. Leslie Rogers

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Honscheid
K. Honscheid The Ohio State University
Harris Kagan
Harris Kagan The Ohio State University
Jeffrey A. Fessler
Jeffrey A. Fessler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alfred O. Hero
Alfred O. Hero University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
E. Nappi
E. Nappi National Institute for Nuclear Physics
Nicholas Petrick
Nicholas Petrick US Food and Drug Administration
Ling Shao
Ling Shao Terminus International
Kenneth Lange
Kenneth Lange University of California, Los Angeles
Xiaoqin Wang
Xiaoqin Wang Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert A. Koeppe
Robert A. Koeppe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of career paths. Many students choose to expand their credentials by pursuing executive mba online programs, which combine leadership skills with technical expertise to prepare graduates for management roles in tech-driven industries.

For those interested in data management, information systems, or digital libraries, accredited online mlis programs (Master of Library and Information Science) are a popular choice for gaining specialized knowledge in information organization and retrieval.

Students who want a broader range of options can explore a variety of affordable master's degrees online in areas like engineering, data analytics, or information technology. These flexible programs often offer concentrations in fast-growing computer science fields.

For ambitious professionals aiming for the highest leadership positions, a doctorate organizational leadership helps develop advanced strategic and organizational skills needed for executive roles in academia, industry, or government.

Best Scientists Citing Neal H. Clinthorne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles