World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
N. Alberto Borghese

N. Alberto Borghese

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4069
World Ranking
13211
National Ranking
466

N. Alberto Borghese publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where N. Alberto Borghese sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 196 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

N. Alberto Borghese D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where N. Alberto Borghese sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

N. Alberto Borghese is affiliated with the University of Milan in Italy and has a research focus spanning computer science, psychology, and medicine. Their scholarly output includes 19 publications in computer science, 18 in psychology, and 11 in medicine. The scientist's work covers several specialized subfields such as computer vision and pattern recognition, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, control and systems engineering, and demography.

Their research topics notably involve context-aware activity recognition systems, technology use by older adults, social robot interaction and human-robot interaction (HRI), assistive technology in communication and mobility, emotion and mood recognition, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and robotic path planning algorithms.

Frequent publication venues for Borghese include the International Journal of Social Robotics, where they have published 4 papers, and Robotics and Autonomous Systems with 3 papers. Additional outlets for their work include arXiv (Cornell University) with 3 publications, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, and JMIR Serious Games.

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate interdisciplinary collaboration and cover various applications in robotics, cognitive assessment, and assistive technologies. Notable recent publications include:

  • Integrating Social Assistive Robots, IoT, Virtual Communities and Smart Objects to Assist at-Home Independently Living Elders: the MoveCare Project (2022, International Journal of Social Robotics)
  • Supervised Digital Neuropsychological Tests for Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: Usability and Clinical Validity Study (2020, JMIR mhealth and uhealth)
  • A Tablet App for Handwriting Skill Screening at the Preliteracy Stage: Instrument Validation Study (2020, JMIR Serious Games)
  • Robot exploration of indoor environments using incomplete and inaccurate prior knowledge (2020, Robotics and Autonomous Systems)
  • Multi-Exergames to Set Targets and Supplement the Intensified Conventional Balance Training in Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Trial (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)

Among frequent co-authors are Matteo Luperto, Simona Ferrante, Nicola Basilico, Francesca Lunardini, and Eleonora Chitti. Collaboration with these researchers highlights a network contributing to robotics, cognitive assessment, and human-computer interaction research.

Best Publications

  • Reading the reading brain: A new meta-analysis of functional imaging data on reading

    Isabella Cattinelli;N. Alberto Borghese;Marcello Gallucci;Eraldo Paulesu

  • Exergaming and rehabilitation: A methodology for the design of effective and safe therapeutic exergames

    Michele Pirovano;Elif Surer;Renato Mainetti;Pier Luca Lanzi

  • Self-adaptive games for rehabilitation at home

    Michele Pirovano;Renato Mainetti;Gabriel Baud-Bovy;Pier Luca Lanzi

  • Computational Intelligence and Game Design for Effective At-Home Stroke Rehabilitation

    Nunzio Alberto Borghese;Michele Pirovano;Pier Luca Lanzi;Seline Wüest

  • Multiscale approximation with hierarchical radial basis functions networks

    S. Ferrari;M. Maggioni;N.A. Borghese

  • Pattern recognition in 3D automatic human motion analysis

    G. Ferrigno;N.A. Borghese;A. Pedotti

  • Autoscan: a flexible and portable 3D scanner

    N.A. Borghese;G. Ferrigno;G. Baroni;A. Pedotti

  • An algorithm for 3-D automatic movement detection by means of standard TV cameras

    N.A. Borghese;G. Ferrigno

  • Distortion correction for x-ray image intensifiers: local unwarping polynomials and RBF neural networks.

    Pietro Cerveri;Christian Forlani;N. A. Borghese;Giancarlo Ferrigno

  • Integrating Social Assistive Robots, IoT, Virtual Communities and Smart Objects to Assist at-Home Independently Living Elders: the MoveCare Project

    Unknown

  • Calibrating a video camera pair with a rigid bar

    N. Alberto Borghese;Pietro Cerveri

  • A Hierarchical RBF Online Learning Algorithm for Real-Time 3-D Scanner

    S. Ferrari;F. Bellocchio;V. Piuri;N.A. Borghese

  • Autonomous rehabilitation at stroke patients home for balance and gait: safety, usability and compliance of a virtual reality system.

    Held Jp;Ferrer B;Mainetti R;Steblin A

  • A portable modular system for automatic acquisition of 3D objects

    N.A. Borghese;S. Ferrari

  • Complete calibration of a stereo photogrammetric system through control points of unknown coordinates.

    Unknown

  • Hierarchical RBF networks and local parameters estimate

    Nunzio Alberto Borghese;Stefano Ferrari

  • On the assessment of coordination between upper extremities: towards a common language between rehabilitation engineers, clinicians and neuroscientists.

    Camila Shirota;Jelka Jansa;Javier Diaz;Sivakumar Balasubramanian

  • Intelligent Game Engine for Rehabilitation (IGER)

    Michele Pirovano;Renato Mainetti;Gabriel Baud-Bovy;Pier Luca Lanzi

  • Statistical Based Impulsive Noise Removal in Digital Radiography

    Unknown

  • Hierarchical Approach for Multiscale Support Vector Regression

    Francesco Bellocchio;S. Ferrari;V. Piuri;N. A. Borghese

  • An integrated low-cost system for at-home rehabilitation

    Nunzio Alberto Borghese;Michele Pirovano;Renato Mainetti;Pier Luca Lanzi

  • Automatic multiscale meshing through HRBF networks

    S. Ferrari;I. Frosio;V. Piuri;N.A. Borghese

  • A Novel Approach to the Problem of Non-uniqueness of the Solution in Hierarchical Clustering

    I. Cattinelli;G. Valentini;E. Paulesu;N. A. Borghese

  • Enhancing digital cephalic radiography with mixture models and local gamma correction

    I. Frosio;G. Ferrigno;N.A. Borghese

  • An intelligent game engine for the at-home rehabilitation of stroke patients

    N. Alberto Borghese;Renato Mainetti;Michele Pirovano;Pier Luca Lanzi

  • User Perspectives on Exergames Designed to Explore the Hemineglected Space for Stroke Patients With Visuospatial Neglect: Usability Study

    Bernadette C Tobler-Ammann;Bernadette C Tobler-Ammann;Elif Surer;Elif Surer;Ruud H Knols;N Alberto Borghese

Frequent Co-Authors

Pier Luca Lanzi
Pier Luca Lanzi Polytechnic University of Milan
Stefano Ferrari
Stefano Ferrari Veneto Eye Bank Foundation
Vincenzo Piuri
Vincenzo Piuri University of Milan
Gabriella Pravettoni
Gabriella Pravettoni University of Milan
Giancarlo Ferrigno
Giancarlo Ferrigno Polytechnic University of Milan
Javier Gonzalez-Jimenez
Javier Gonzalez-Jimenez University of Malaga
Alessandra Gorini
Alessandra Gorini University of Milan
Angelo Cangelosi
Angelo Cangelosi University of Manchester
Ray Jones
Ray Jones Plymouth University
Matteo Cesari
Matteo Cesari University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible education paths. Many students interested in technology or sciences consider online programs for greater accessibility and affordability.

For example, you might also look into earning a bachelor of science in physics online. This pathway is especially appealing if you’re fascinated by the principles governing computers, electronics, and the universe.

Data is central to tech careers. Those pursuing analytics or AI roles may be interested in the cheapest data science masters in usa. These programs can boost your credentials at a lower cost.

Engineering is another strong option. Consider some of the best online electrical engineering programs USA for careers designing hardware, devices, or power systems.

If you seek faster entry into tech roles, there are also short certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can improve your employability in months rather than years, making them a smart choice for career changers or upskilling.

Best Scientists Citing N. Alberto Borghese

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles