World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mutsumasa Takahashi

Mutsumasa Takahashi

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
19899
World Ranking
18499
National Ranking
594

Mutsumasa Takahashi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mutsumasa Takahashi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 472 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mutsumasa Takahashi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mutsumasa Takahashi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mutsumasa Takahashi was affiliated with Kumamoto University in Japan during their academic career. The academic record does not list any recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues connected to their research output.

Information on main fields of study, subfields, and topics of work related to Mutsumasa Takahashi is not available. Similarly, no book publications have been documented under their name.

Details regarding awards or recognitions conferred to Mutsumasa Takahashi are not recorded. Their overall contribution remains noted but without specific documented achievements or collaborations publicly listed.

The profile reflects the known data for a scientist who is deceased. The absence of publication and collaboration records prevents further detailed insights into their scientific work or impact within their discipline.

Best Publications

  • Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas.

    Takeshi Sugahara;Yukunori Korogi;Masato Kochi;Ichiro Ikushima

  • Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of percutaneous microwave coagulation.

    R Murakami;S Yoshimatsu;Y Yamashita;T Matsukawa

  • Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas.

    T Sugahara;Y Korogi;M Kochi;I Ikushima

  • Posttherapeutic Intraaxial Brain Tumor: The Value of Perfusion-sensitive Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for Differentiating Tumor Recurrence from Nonneoplastic Contrast-enhancing Tissue

    Takeshi Sugahara;Yukunori Korogi;Seiji Tomiguchi;Yoshinori Shigematsu

  • Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging.

    Tomohiro Namimoto;Yasuyuki Yamashita;Seiya Sumi;Yi Tang

  • Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver damage: prospective comparison of detection with dynamic MR imaging and helical CT of the whole liver.

    Yasuyuki Yamashita;Katsuhiko Mitsuzaki;Tang Yi;Ichiro Ogata

  • Abdominal Helical CT: Evaluation of Optimal Doses of Intravenous Contrast Material—A Prospective Randomized Study

    Yasuyuki Yamashita;Yasuyuki Komohara;Mutsumasa Takahashi;Masafumi Uchida

  • MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences.

    Toshiyuki Miyazaki;Yasuyuki Yamashita;Tadatoshi Tsuchigame;Hiroaki Yamamoto

  • Chronic cervical cord compression: clinical significance of increased signal intensity on MR images.

    M Takahashi;Y Yamashita;Y Sakamoto;R Kojima

  • Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse renal disease by diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging.

    Tomohiro Namimoto;Yasuyuki Yamashita;Katsuhiko Mitsuzaki;Yoshiharu Nakayama

  • MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence.

    Yasuyuki Yamashita;Tomohiro Namimoto;Yasuko Abe;Mutsumasa Takahashi

  • Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

    Toshinori Hirai;Yukunori Korogi;Ken Ono;Masafumi Nagano

  • Intracranial aneurysms: detection with three-dimensional CT angiography with volume rendering--comparison with conventional angiographic and surgical findings.

    Yukunori Korogi;Mutsumasa Takahashi;Kazuhiro Katada;Yuko Ogura

  • Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2-weighted MR imaging : differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications

    Yasuyuki Yamashita;Miyuki Torashima;Mutsumasa Takahashi;Nobuyuki Tanaka

  • Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

    Yasuyuki Yamashita;Mikihiko Harada;Takamine Sawada;Mutsumasa Takahashi

  • Comparison of 2D and 3D Digital Subtraction Angiography in Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms

    Takeshi Sugahara;Yukunori Korogi;Kouji Nakashima;Satoshi Hamatake

  • Acute interstitial pneumonia: comparison of high-resolution computed tomography findings between survivors and nonsurvivors.

    Kazuya Ichikado;Moritaka Suga;Nestor L Müller;Hiroyuki Taniguchi

  • Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.

    Katsuhiko Mitsuzaki;Yasuyuki Yamashita;Ichiro Ogata;Taiji Nishiharu

  • Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma arising in cirrhotic livers: comparison of gadolinium- and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging.

    Yi Tang;Yasuyuki Yamashita;Akihiko Arakawa;Tomohiro Namimoto

  • Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.

    Y Yamashita;M Torashima;Y Hatanaka;M Harada

Frequent Co-Authors

Yasuyuki Yamashita
Yasuyuki Yamashita Kumamoto University
Hitoshi Okamura
Hitoshi Okamura Kyoto University
Hirofumi Yasue
Hirofumi Yasue Kumamoto University
Michio Ogawa
Michio Ogawa Kumamoto University
Masayuki Ando
Masayuki Ando Kumamoto University
Takeshi Johkoh
Takeshi Johkoh Osaka University
Nestor L. Müller
Nestor L. Müller University of British Columbia
Hironobu Nakamura
Hironobu Nakamura Osaka University
Hiroshi Fujita
Hiroshi Fujita Gifu University
Sidney Wallace
Sidney Wallace The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens up several related fields and flexible online degree options. For those interested in entering practical nursing, you might wonder, do you have to take a teas test for lpn? The answer varies, with many schools offering programs without strict entrance exam requirements, providing smoother access to nursing education.

Healthcare administration is another popular pathway. If you're eager to move up in the healthcare field, consider a healthcare administration accelerated degree. These programs are designed for quick completion and can be pursued entirely online, making them ideal for busy professionals.

Registered nurses seeking advanced practice roles might explore an asn to fnp bridge program. These accelerated tracks allow associate degree nurses to earn a master's and become family nurse practitioners, expanding career prospects.

Lastly, for those passionate about health and wellness, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition offers knowledge in dietetics and opens doors to careers in public health, education, and consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Mutsumasa Takahashi

Recently Published Articles