World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 37 8298 7997 201 198 85 6826

M.P. Dorado publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M.P. Dorado between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M.P. Dorado published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2014. 11 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2014. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
2001 2025

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M.P. Dorado: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 1
2008 1
2009 4
2010 7
2011 7
2012 7
2013 6
2014 12
2015 3
2016 5
2017 3
2018 5
2019 3
2020 5
2021 4
2022 7
2023 6
2024 7
2025 4
Total 110
Download as CSV

M.P. Dorado publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.P. Dorado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 85 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190 85
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

M.P. Dorado D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.P. Dorado sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312 37
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

M.P. Dorado is affiliated with the University of Córdoba in Spain and has contributed extensively to engineering research, publishing primarily within the field. Their work spans several engineering subfields, including biomedical engineering, fluid flow and transfer processes, molecular biology, automotive engineering, and aerospace engineering.

The main topics of Dorado's research focus on biodiesel production and applications, advanced combustion engine technologies, and vehicle emissions and performance. Additional areas of interest include thermochemical biomass conversion processes, microbial metabolic engineering and bioproduction, enzyme catalysis and immobilization, and combustion and detonation processes.

Dorado has published in various scientific venues with notable frequency. Top publication venues include:

  • Fuel
  • Renewable Energy
  • Sustainability
  • Energies
  • Bioresource Technology

Several recent papers demonstrate the scope of Dorado's research collaborations and thematic interests. These include:

  • "Food waste from restaurant sector - Characterization for biorefinery approach" (2020, Bioresource Technology)
  • "Biodiesel production using microbial lipids derived from food waste discarded by catering services" (2020, Bioresource Technology)
  • "Kinetic and thermodynamic behavior of co-pyrolysis of olive pomace and thermoplastic waste via thermogravimetric analysis" (2024, Renewable Energy)
  • "A Review of the Use of Hydrogen in Compression Ignition Engines with Dual-Fuel Technology and Techniques for Reducing NOx Emissions" (2024, Sustainability)
  • "Spent coffee grounds and orange peel residues based biorefinery for microbial oil and biodiesel conversion estimation" (2023, Renewable Energy)

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Dorado include:

  • Miguel Carmona-Cabello
  • S. Pinzi
  • J. Sáez-Bastante
  • Juan Manuel Rueda-Vázquez
  • Francisco José Jiménez-Espadafor Aguilar

Dorado's research visibly intersects sustainable energy production, biorefinery approaches, and combustion technology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to engineering challenges. Their scientific output highlights a consistent focus on applying engineering principles to renewable energy sources and alternative fuels.

Best Publications

  • Exhaust emissions from a Diesel engine fueled with transesterified waste olive oil

    M P Dorado;E Ballesteros;J M Arnal

  • The Ideal Vegetable Oil-based Biodiesel Composition: A Review of Social, Economical and Technical Implications

    S. Pinzi;I. L. Garcia;F. J. Lopez-Gimenez;M. D. Luque de Castro

  • Stability, Lubricity, Viscosity, and Cold-Flow Properties of Alcohol−Diesel Blends

    Magín Lapuerta;Reyes García-Contreras;Javier Campos-Fernández;M. Pilar Dorado

  • A comparison of performance of higher alcohols/diesel fuel blends in a diesel engine

    Javier Campos-Fernández;Juan M. Arnal;Jose Gómez;M. Pilar Dorado

  • Optimization of alkali-catalyzed transesterification of Brassica carinata oil for biodiesel production

    Unknown

  • AN ALKALI–CATALYZED TRANSESTERIFICATION PROCESS FOR HIGH FREE FATTY ACID WASTE OILS

    Unknown

  • Physical and chemical properties of ethanol–diesel fuel blends

    Unknown

  • The potential for agro-industrial waste utilization using oleaginous yeast for the production of biodiesel

    D.E. Leiva-Candia;S. Pinzi;M.D. Redel-Macías;Apostolis Koutinas

  • Performance tests of a diesel engine fueled with pentanol/diesel fuel blends

    Javier Campos-Fernandez;Juan M. Arnal;Jose Gomez;Nayare Lacalle

  • Latest trends in feedstocks for biodiesel production

    Unknown

  • An approach to the economics of two vegetable oil-based biofuels in Spain

    M.P. Dorado;F. Cruz;J.M. Palomar;F.J. López

  • Testing Waste Olive Oil Methyl Ester as a Fuel in a Diesel Engine

    M. P. Dorado;E. Ballesteros;J. M. Arnal;J. Gomez

  • KINETIC PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE ALKALI-CATALYZED TRANSESTERIFICATION PROCESS OF USED OLIVE OIL

    Unknown

  • Multiple response optimization of vegetable oils fatty acid composition to improve biodiesel physical properties.

    S. Pinzi;D. Leiva;G. Arzamendi;L.M. Gandia

  • Evaluation of by-products from the biodiesel industry as fermentation feedstock for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) production by Cupriavidus necator

    I.L. García;J.A. López;M.P. Dorado;N. Kopsahelis

  • Biorefining of by-product streams from sunflower-based biodiesel production plants for integrated synthesis of microbial oil and value-added co-products

    D.E. Leiva-Candia;S. Tsakona;N. Kopsahelis;I.L. García

  • Characterization of solar flat plate collectors

    F. Cruz-Peragon;J.M. Palomar;P.J. Casanova;M.P. Dorado

  • Effect of the use of olive–pomace oil biodiesel/diesel fuel blends in a compression ignition engine: Preliminary exergy analysis

    I. López;C.E. Quintana;J.J. Ruiz;F. Cruz-Peragón

  • THE EFFECT OF A WASTE VEGETABLE OIL BLEND WITH DIESEL FUEL ON ENGINE PERFORMANCE

    M. P. Dorado;J. M. Arnal;J. Gómez;A. Gil

  • Physical and Chemical Properties of Ethanol−Biodiesel Blends for Diesel Engines

    Unknown

  • Influence of vegetable oils fatty-acid composition on biodiesel optimization.

    S. Pinzi;J.M. Mata-Granados;F.J. Lopez-Gimenez;M.D. Luque de Castro

  • Influence of vegetable oils fatty acid composition on reaction temperature and glycerides conversion to biodiesel during transesterification.

    S. Pinzi;L.M. Gandía;G. Arzamendi;J.J. Ruiz

  • Food waste from restaurant sector - Characterization for biorefinery approach.

    M. Carmona-Cabello;I.L. García;J. Sáez-Bastante;S. Pinzi

  • Air and noise pollution of a diesel engine fueled with olive pomace oil methyl ester and petrodiesel blends

    M.D. Redel-Macías;S. Pinzi;D. Leiva;A.J. Cubero-Atienza

  • Optimization of solid food waste oil biodiesel by ultrasound-assisted transesterification

    M. Carmona-Cabello;J. Sáez-Bastante;S. Pinzi;M.P. Dorado

  • Biodiesel production using microbial lipids derived from food waste discarded by catering services.

    Miguel Carmona-Cabello;I.L. García;Aikaterini Papadaki;Erminda Tsouko

  • Biodiesel from saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid methyl esters and their influence over noise and air pollution

    M.D. Redel-Macías;S. Pinzi;M.F. Ruz;A.J. Cubero-Atienza

  • Biorefinery development through utilization of biodiesel industry by-products as sole fermentation feedstock for 1,3-propanediol production

    Afroditi Chatzifragkou;Seraphim Papanikolaou;Nikolaos Kopsahelis;Vasiliki Kachrimanidou

Frequent Co-Authors

Apostolis A. Koutinas
Apostolis A. Koutinas Agricultural University of Athens
M. D. Luque de Castro
M. D. Luque de Castro University of Córdoba
Seraphim Papanikolaou
Seraphim Papanikolaou Agricultural University of Athens
Gurutze Arzamendi
Gurutze Arzamendi Universidad Publica De Navarra
Luis M. Gandía
Luis M. Gandía Universidad Publica De Navarra
Pedro Antonio Gutiérrez
Pedro Antonio Gutiérrez University of Córdoba
César Hervás-Martínez
César Hervás-Martínez University of Córdoba
Colin Webb
Colin Webb University of Manchester
Jose Martin Herreros
Jose Martin Herreros University of Birmingham
Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro
Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro University of Almería

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology majors often pursue specialized career paths and enhance their skills through flexible education options. Online degrees have become a popular route for professionals seeking advancement or a career shift while balancing work and life commitments.

For those interested in leadership and business management, an online mba no gmat can open doors to higher-level roles without the need for standardized test scores. Aspiring project leaders might consider a degree in project management online to acquire skills in planning, execution, and team coordination.

Technology knowledge is also valuable in rapidly changing fields like real estate. An real estate degree taught online can introduce students to property technology, analytics, and investment strategies. Additionally, as user experience becomes critical across industries, pursuing ux degree programs gives graduates the creative and technical skills needed for in-demand design roles.

Each pathway offers new opportunities for those in engineering and technology, allowing you to tailor your education to meet evolving industry needs.

Best Scientists Citing M.P. Dorado

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles