World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 69 2316 2201 288 276 224 30467

Mina Ryten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mina Ryten between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mina Ryten published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2023. 59 of the 316 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 31 publications
2001 2025

316 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mina Ryten: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 0
2011 5
2012 8
2013 11
2014 11
2015 14
2016 12
2017 12
2018 16
2019 17
2020 30
2021 38
2022 34
2023 39
2024 28
2025 31
Total 316
Download as CSV

Mina Ryten publications per year - data summary

  • Mina Ryten, a Genetics scholar from University College London, has 316 publications recorded across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2001 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 39 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 25 years in the span carry no publications at all (2006 and 2010).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 13.7 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 170 publications, 54% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2001-2009: 10 publications (1.1 per year); 2010-2018: 89 publications (9.9 per year); 2019-2025: 217 publications (31.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mina Ryten publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mina Ryten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 215–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 224 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134 224
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Mina Ryten publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Mina Ryten, a Genetics scholar from University College London, records 224 publications - the 59th percentile of the discipline.
  • 59% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Mina Ryten, and about 41% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Mina Ryten ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Mina Ryten D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mina Ryten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164 69
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Mina Ryten D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Mina Ryten, a Genetics scholar from University College London, records 69 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Mina Ryten, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Mina Ryten ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

Mina Ryten is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a total of 238 publications in the former and 149 in the latter.

Their work focuses on several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, and Physiology. The scientist's research topics of interest include:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • RNA regulation and disease
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments

Mina Ryten has contributed to prominent scientific venues where they have frequently published. The most common publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain
  • Nature Communications
  • Movement Disorders
  • Brain Communications

They have collaborated extensively with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including John Hardy, Regina H. Reynolds, Emil K. Gustavsson, Sonia García-Ruiz, and Juan A. Botía.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks+ E. coli" (2020) in Nature
  • "ggtranscript: an R package for the visualization and interpretation of transcript isoforms using ggplot2" (2022) in Bioinformatics
  • "Finding genetically-supported drug targets for Parkinson's disease using Mendelian randomization of the druggable genome" (2021) in Nature Communications
  • "Identification of Candidate Parkinson Disease Genes by Integrating Genome-Wide Association Study, Expression, and Epigenetic Data Sets" (2021) in JAMA Neurology
  • "Developmental Consequences of Defective ATG7-Mediated Autophagy in Humans" (2021) in New England Journal of Medicine

Best Publications

  • A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD

    Alan E. Renton;Elisa Majounie;Adrian James Waite;Javier Simón-Sánchez;Javier Simón-Sánchez

  • Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies

    Mike A Nalls;Cornelis Blauwendraat;Costanza L Vallerga;Karl Heilbron

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks+ E. coli.

    Cayetano Pleguezuelos-Manzano;Jens Puschhof;Axel Rosendahl Huber;Arne van Hoeck

  • Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures.

    Derrek P. Hibar;Jason L. Stein;Jason L. Stein;Miguel E. Renteria;Alejandro Arias-Vasquez

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • The transcriptional landscape of age in human peripheral blood

    Marjolein J. Peters;Roby Joehanes;Luke C. Pilling;Claudia Schurmann;Claudia Schurmann

  • Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes

    Jason L Stein;Sarah E Medland;Sarah E Medland;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Derrek P Hibar

  • Genetic variability in the regulation of gene expression in ten regions of the human brain

    Adaikalavan Ramasamy;Adaikalavan Ramasamy;Daniah Trabzuni;Sebastian Guelfi;Vibin Varghese

  • Rare coding variants in the phospholipase D3 gene confer risk for Alzheimer’s disease

    C Cruchaga;CM Karch;SC Jin;BA Benitez

  • Parkinson's disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the α-synuclein locus

    Michael J. Devine;Mina Ryten;Petr Vodicka;Alison J. Thomson

  • Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study.

    Christopher D Whelan;Christopher D Whelan;Andre Altmann;Juan A Botía;Neda Jahanshad

  • Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data

    J Kaplanis;K E Samocha;L Wiel;Z Zhang

  • Excessive burden of lysosomal storage disorder gene variants in Parkinson's disease

    L.A. Robak;L.A. Robak;I.E. Jansen;I.E. Jansen;J van Rooij;A.G. Uitterlinden

  • Loss of VPS13C Function in Autosomal-Recessive Parkinsonism Causes Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Increases PINK1/Parkin-Dependent Mitophagy.

    Suzanne Lesage;Valérie Drouet;Elisa Majounie;Vincent Deramecourt

  • Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    S. E. Stewart;D. Yu;J. M. Scharf;B. M. Neale

  • Unbiased screen for interactors of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 supports a common pathway for sporadic and familial Parkinson disease

    A. Beilina;I. N. Rudenko;A. Kaganovich;L. Civiero

  • A Two-Stage Meta-Analysis Identifies Several New Loci for Parkinson's Disease

    V. Plagnol;M.A. Nalls;J.M. Bras;D.G. Hernandez;D.G. Hernandez

  • Major Shifts in Glial Regional Identity Are a Transcriptional Hallmark of Human Brain Aging.

    Lilach Soreq;Lilach Soreq;Jamie Rose;Eyal Soreq;John Hardy

  • Novel genetic loci associated with hippocampal volume

    Derrek Hibar;Hieab H.H. Adams;Neda Jahanshad;Ganesh Chauhan

Frequent Co-Authors

John Hardy
John Hardy University College London
Adaikalavan Ramasamy
Adaikalavan Ramasamy A*STAR - Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Michael E. Weale
Michael E. Weale King's College London
Dena G. Hernandez
Dena G. Hernandez National Institutes of Health
Henry Houlden
Henry Houlden University College London
Andrew B. Singleton
Andrew B. Singleton National Institutes of Health
Colin Smith
Colin Smith University of Edinburgh
Nicholas W. Wood
Nicholas W. Wood University College London
Mike A. Nalls
Mike A. Nalls National Institutes of Health
Mark R. Cookson
Mark R. Cookson National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Genetics can open doors to many rewarding healthcare careers. With the rise of online education, there are now more flexible options for students to pursue related degrees and certifications without putting their lives on hold.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their qualifications, rn to bsn programs no clinicals offer the opportunity to progress without traditional in-person requirements. Those aiming for the highest level of nursing practice may consider the fastest dnp program or explore options among online dnp programs, both of which can save valuable time and offer increased flexibility.

If you wish to enter the healthcare field quickly, there are also accelerated cma program choices that enable swift entry-level certification. These educational pathways complement genetics expertise, increase employability, and provide critical skills needed in today’s healthcare environment. Explore your options to find the best fit for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mina Ryten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles