World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
9094
World Ranking
5942
National Ranking
3226

Michael M. Vanyukov publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Vanyukov sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael M. Vanyukov D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Vanyukov sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael M. Vanyukov is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of genetics, medicine, and psychology, with a particular emphasis on substance abuse treatment and outcomes.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Psychology

Within these broader disciplines, their subfields of study cover:

  • Genetics
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Molecular Biology

Their research topics extend across several domains related to mental health and genetic factors, including:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Notable recent papers by Michael M. Vanyukov include:

  • "A large-scale genome-wide association study meta-analysis of cannabis use disorder," 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Transdiagnostic risk of mental disorders in offspring of affected parents: a meta-analysis of family high-risk and registry studies," 2023, World Psychiatry
  • "Stigmata that are desired: contradictions in addiction," 2023, Addiction Research & Theory
  • "Normalization of Prevention Principles and Practices to Reduce Substance Use Disorders Through an Integrated Dissemination and Implementation Framework," 2023, Prevention Science
  • "Coupled mixed model for joint genetic analysis of complex disorders with two independently collected data sets," 2021, BMC Bioinformatics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michael M. Vanyukov include:

  • Levent Kirisci
  • Maureen Reynolds
  • Ralph E. Tarter
  • Merete Nordentoft
  • Judy L. Silberg

Their publications are often featured in journals such as:

  • Addiction Research & Theory
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • World Psychiatry
  • Prevention Science

Best Publications

  • Neurobehavioral Disinhibition in Childhood Predicts Early Age at Onset of Substance Use Disorder

    Ralph E. Tarter;Levent Kirisci;Ada Mezzich;Jack R. Cornelius

  • Transancestral GWAS of alcohol dependence reveals common genetic underpinnings with psychiatric disorders

    Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters;Renato Polimanti;Emma C. Johnson;Jeanette N. McClintick

  • Common liability to addiction and “gateway hypothesis”: Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective

    Michael M. Vanyukov;Ralph E. Tarter;Galina P. Kirillova;Levent Kirisci

  • Etiology of early age onset substance use disorder: A maturational perspective

    Ralph E. Tarter;Michael Vanyukov;Peter Giancola;Michael Dawes

  • A large-scale genome-wide association study meta-analysis of cannabis use disorder

    Emma C Johnson;Ditte Demontis;Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson;Raymond K Walters

  • Neurobehavior disinhibition in childhood predisposes boys to substance use disorder by young adulthood: direct and mediated etiologic pathways

    Ralph E Tarter;Levent Kirisci;Miguel Habeych;Maureen Reynolds

  • Origins and consequences of child neglect in substance abuse families

    Marija G. Dunn;Ralph E. Tarter;Ada C. Mezzich;Michael Vanyukov

  • Dopamine system genes and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis.

    Brion S. Maher;Mary L. Marazita;Robert E. Ferrell;Michael M. Vanyukov

  • Antisocial symptoms in preadolescent boys and in their parents: Associations with cortisol

    Michael M. Vanyukov;Howard B. Moss;Joseph A. Plail;Timothy Blackson

  • Alcoholism: A Developmental Disorder.

    Ralph E. Tarter;Michael Vanyukov

  • Liability to substance use disorders: 1. Common mechanisms and manifestations.

    Michael M Vanyukov;Ralph E Tarter;Levent Kirisci;Galina P Kirillova

  • Salivary cortisol responses and the risk for substance abuse in prepubertal boys

    Howard B. Moss;Michael M. Vanyukov;Christopher S. Martin

  • Predictors of marijuana use in adolescents before and after licit drug use: examination of the gateway hypothesis.

    Ralph E. Tarter;Michael Vanyukov;Levent Kirisci;Maureen Reynolds

  • Aggressivity, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity in boys at high and low risk for substance abuse

    Christopher S. Martin;Mitchell Earleywine;Timothy C. Blackson;Michael M. Vanyukov

  • Psychopathology risk transmission in children of parents with substance use disorders.

    Duncan B. Clark;Jack Cornelius;D. Scott Wood;Michael Vanyukov

  • Genetic studies of substance abuse

    M.M Vanyukov;R.E Tarter

  • Salivary cortisol responses in prepubertal boys: the effects of parental substance abuse and association with drug use behavior during adolescence

    Howard B Moss;Michael Vanyukov;Jeffrey K Yao;Galina P Kirillova

  • Developmental sources of variation in liability to adolescent substance use disorders

    Michael A Dawes;Seymour M Antelman;Michael M Vanyukov;Peter Giancola

  • Association of the OPRM1 Variant rs1799971 (A118G) with Non-Specific Liability to Substance Dependence in a Collaborative de novo Meta-Analysis of European-Ancestry Cohorts

    Tae Hwi Schwantes-An;Tae Hwi Schwantes-An;Juan Zhang;Juan Zhang;Li Shiun Chen;Sarah M. Hartz

  • Introduction: Theoretical and Operational Framework for Research into the Etiology of Substance Use Disorders

    Ralph E. Tarter;Michael M. Vanyukov

  • Etiology of early age onset substance use disorder

    Ralph Tarter;Michael Vanyukov;Peter Giancola;Michael A Dawes

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph E. Tarter
Ralph E. Tarter University of Pittsburgh
Levent Kirisci
Levent Kirisci University of Pittsburgh
Joel Gelernter
Joel Gelernter Yale University
Howard B. Moss
Howard B. Moss University of California, Riverside
Pamela A. F. Madden
Pamela A. F. Madden Washington University in St. Louis
Per Hoffmann
Per Hoffmann University of Bonn
Ada C. Mezzich
Ada C. Mezzich University of Pittsburgh
Stefan Herms
Stefan Herms University of Basel
Lindsay A. Farrer
Lindsay A. Farrer Boston University
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA often opens doors to various related fields, especially social work. Many students consider pursuing a specialized degree that complements their understanding of human behavior and supports diverse communities. The flexibility of online programs allows students to focus on specific populations or regions while advancing their careers.

If you’re interested in making a difference at a state or regional level, you can look into the top social work degrees in Mississippi or the best social work degree programs in Nashville. These programs offer practical training tailored to local needs.

For those considering opportunities in the Midwest or the Northeast, reviewing the best social work degree programs in North Dakota and the best social work programs in the Northeast can help you find the right fit. Each pathway prepares graduates for roles in counseling, case management, and advocacy—crucial career options closely connected to psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Vanyukov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles