World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
38
Citations
5135
World Ranking
2298
National Ranking
832

Michael R. Lovell publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Lovell sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 158 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Michael R. Lovell D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Lovell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors

Overview

Michael R. Lovell was affiliated with Marquette University in the United States. Their academic career included contributions to research published in recognized scientific venues.

The following paper was part of their recent publications:

  • Support U.S. research during COVID-19, 2020, Science

Their frequent coauthors included:

  • Michael M. Crow
  • Jonathan R. Alger
  • Michael D. Amiridis
  • Dennis N. Assanis
  • Eric J. Barron

The most frequent publication venue for their work was:

  • Science

Michael R. Lovell held the distinction of being a Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors, an award received in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Tribology for Scientists and Engineers

    Pradeep L. Menezes;Michael Nosonovsky;Sudeep P. Ingole;Satish V. Kailas

  • The influence of fatty acids on tribological and thermal properties of natural oils as sustainable biolubricants

    Carlton J. Reeves;Pradeep L. Menezes;Tien-Chien Jen;Michael R. Lovell

  • Predicting springback in sheet metal forming: an explicit to implicit sequential solution procedure

    Narkeeran Narasimhan;Michael Lovell

  • The Size Effect of Boron Nitride Particles on the Tribological Performance of Biolubricants for Energy Conservation and Sustainability

    Carlton J. Reeves;Pradeep L. Menezes;Michael R. Lovell;Tien-Chien Jen

  • Formulation and processing of novel conductive solution inks in continuous inkjet printing of 3-D electric circuits

    Junfeng Mei;M.R. Lovell;M.H. Mickle

  • Investigation of springback in high strength anisotropic steels

    Carlos Gomes;Oladipo Onipede;Michael Lovell

  • Increasing formability in sheet metal stamping operations using environmentally friendly lubricants

    M. Lovell;C.F. Higgs;P. Deshmukh;A. Mobley

  • Influence of boric acid additive size on green lubricant performance

    Michael R. Lovell;Michael R. Lovell;M. A. Kabir;M. A. Kabir;Pradeep L. Menezes;Pradeep L. Menezes;C. Fred Higgs

  • Investigation of the morphology of internal defects in cross wedge rolling

    Qiang Li;Michael R Lovell;William Slaughter;Kaveh Tagavi

  • Analysis of stress in cross wedge rolling with application to failure

    Yaomin Dong;Kaveh A Tagavi;Michael R Lovell;Zhi Deng

  • On the friction and wear performance of boric acid lubricant combinations in extended duration operations

    Pushkarraj Deshmukh;Michael Lovell;W. Gregory Sawyer;Anton Mobley

  • Role of Surface Texture, Roughness, and Hardness on Friction During Unidirectional Sliding

    Pradeep L. Menezes;Pradeep L. Menezes;Kishore;Satish V. Kailas;Michael R. Lovell

  • Experimental and numerical analysis of helical-wedge rolling process for producing steel balls

    Zbigniew Pater;Janusz Tomczak;Jarosław Bartnicki;Michael R. Lovell

  • Establishment of failure conditions for the cross-wedge rolling of hollow shafts

    S. Urankar;M. Lovell;C. Morrow;Q. Li

  • Studies on the formation of discontinuous rock fragments during cutting operation

    Pradeep L. Menezes;Michael R. Lovell;Ilya V. Avdeev;C. Fred Higgs

  • Boundary element method analysis of temperature fields in coated cutting tools

    Fang Du;Michael R Lovell;Tim W Wu

  • A JKR–DMT transition solution for adhesive rough surface contact

    Clint Morrow;Michael Lovell;Xinguo Ning

  • Tribology of Metal Matrix Composites

    Pradeep K. Rohatgi;Meysam Tabandeh-Khorshid;Emad Omrani;Michael R. Lovell

  • Friction and transfer layer formation in polymer–steel tribo-system: Role of surface texture and roughness parameters

    Pradeep L. Menezes;Pradeep L. Menezes;Kishore;Satish V. Kailas;Michael R. Lovell

  • Cross wedge rolling failure mechanisms and industrial application

    Qiang Li;Michael Lovell

  • Tribology for scientists and engineers : from basics to advanced concepts

    Pradeep L. Menezes;Michael Nosonovsky;Sudeep Prabhakar Ingole;Satish Vasu Kailas

  • On the Friction and Wear Performance of Boric Acid Lubricant Combinations in Extended Duration Operations

    P. V. Deshmukh;M. Lovell;W. G. Sawyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Pradeep L. Menezes
Pradeep L. Menezes University of Nevada Reno
Satish V. Kailas
Satish V. Kailas Indian Institute of Science
Kishore
Kishore Indian Institute of Science
Pradeep K. Rohatgi
Pradeep K. Rohatgi University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Michael M. Khonsari
Michael M. Khonsari Louisiana State University
Michael Nosonovsky
Michael Nosonovsky University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Leaf Huang
Leaf Huang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mark L. Dietz
Mark L. Dietz University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Ervin Sejdic
Ervin Sejdic University of Pittsburgh
W. Gregory Sawyer
W. Gregory Sawyer Moffitt Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career pathways. Students often consider programs that offer flexibility while maintaining rigorous standards. Understanding acceptance rates is crucial, as seen in fields like speech pathology. For those curious about admission chances, reviewing speech pathology grad school acceptance rates offers valuable insight into competitive program benchmarks.

Additionally, some online programs may be more accessible than others. Individuals looking for less competitive options might find it helpful to explore the easiest slp grad schools to get into. This can inform decisions on where to apply based on program selectivity and entrance criteria.

Cost is another significant factor when choosing an online degree. Prospective students should research tuition and associated fees to find programs that fit their budget. Detailed breakdowns on program expenses can be found in articles about online speech pathology degree programs cost, offering a useful comparison point for similar engineering programs.

For veterans, specialized support and benefits often ease the pathway to higher education. Resources tailored to military backgrounds add value to online learning experiences. Information relevant to this audience is available through guides on obtaining a speech pathology degree online for veterans, which highlights opportunities and advantages that might also apply to engineering disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Lovell

Recently Published Articles