World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
22196
World Ranking
8994
National Ranking
4764

Michael J. Kozak publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Kozak sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Kozak D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Kozak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Kozak was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with contributions spanning key subfields such as Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Safety Research, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The scholar's work concentrated on several main topics, including:

  • Spinal Hematomas and Complications
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
  • Science Education and Perceptions
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management

Their recent publications consisted of research articles across various medical and educational venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Lumbar Puncture in Thrombocytopenia: The Floor Is Not Firm," published in 2023 in Cureus
  • "A Multi-Pronged Approach to Boosting STEM Engagement Through Low and No Cost Solutions," presented in 2022 at the IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)
  • "Epidural Steroid Injection Prior to Spinal Surgery: A Step-Wise and Wise Approach," published in 2023 in Cureus
  • "Commensal Streptococcal Infective Endocarditis of the Native Mitral Valve in a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Patient: A Heartful, a Handful, and a Mouthful," published in 2023 in Cureus
  • "Introduction to the AI Special Edition Themed Issue," published in 2025 in the Impacting Education Journal on Transforming Professional Practice (co-authored with James Dunnigan)

Frequent publication venues for Kozak's work included:

  • Cureus
  • 2022 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)
  • Impacting Education Journal on Transforming Professional Practice

Collaborative research featured repeated coauthorship with several researchers, including:

  • David R Hallan
  • Elias Rizk
  • Mason Stoltzfus
  • Michael Kopack
  • Samantha Kupersmith

Their scholarly output reflected an interdisciplinary approach connecting clinical medicine with educational innovation and safety research. This blend of topics included clinical management of spinal and neurological conditions, alongside studies aimed at improving STEM engagement and professional development.

Best Publications

  • Emotional processing of fear : exposure to corrective information

    Edna B. Foa;Michael J. Kozak

  • Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of exposure and ritual prevention, clomipramine, and their combination in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Edna B. Foa;Michael R. Liebowitz;Michael J. Kozak;Sharon Davies

  • Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Randy Frost;Gail Steketee;Nader Amir;Martine Bouvard

  • The Validation of a New Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale: The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory

    Edna B. Foa;Michael J. Kozak;Paul M. Salkovskis;Meredith E. Coles

  • Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria.

    Charles A. Sanislow;Daniel S. Pine;Kevin J. Quinn;Michael J. Kozak

  • The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, Issues, and Pragmatics.

    Michael J. Kozak;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • DSM-IV field trial: Obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    E B Foa;M J Kozak;W K Goodman;E Hollander

  • Processing of threat-related information in rape victims.

    Edna B. Foa;Ulrike Feske;Tamera B. Murdock;Michael J. Kozak

  • Effectiveness of exposure and ritual prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Randomized compared with nonrandomized samples.

    Martin E. Franklin;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Michael J. Kozak;Michael J. Kozak;Jill T. Levitt

  • Fear behavior, fear imagery, and the psychophysiology of emotion: the problem of affective response integration.

    Peter J. Lang;Daniel N. Levin;Gregory A. Miller;Michael J. Kozak

  • Emotional Imagery: Conceptual Structure and Pattern of Somato‐Visceral Response

    Peter J. Lang;Michael J. Kozak;Gregory A. Miller;Daniel N. Levin

  • Constructing constructs for psychopathology: the NIMH research domain criteria.

    Bruce N. Cuthbert;Michael J. Kozak

  • Treatment of Anxiety Disorders : Implications for Psychopathology

    Edna B. Foa;Michael J. Kozak

  • Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information.

    Unknown

  • Obsessions, overvalued ideas, and delusions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Michael J. Kozak;Edna B. Foa

  • Individual differences in imagery and the psychophysiology of emotion

    Gregory A. Miller;Daniel N. Levin;Michael J. Kozak;Edwin W. Cook

  • Learned helplessness in the rat: time course, immunization, and reversibility.

    Martin E. P. Seligman;Robert A. Rosellini;Michael J. Kozak

  • Cognitive-behavioral treatment of pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open clinical trial.

    Martin E. Franklin;Michael J. Kozak;Laurie A. Cashman;Meredith E. Coles

  • Feared consequences, fixity of belief, and treatment outcome in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Edna B. Foa;Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Martin E. Franklin;Michael J. Kozak

  • Process and outcome of exposure treatment with obsessive-compulsives: Psychophysiological indicators of emotional processing

    Michael J. Kozak;Edna B. Foa;Gail Steketee

  • Social Neuroscience: Progress and Implications for Mental Health.

    John T. Cacioppo;David G. Amaral;Jack J. Blanchard;Judy L. Cameron

  • Effects of comorbid depression on response to treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Martin E. Franklin;Gordon P. Street;Michael J. Kozak

Frequent Co-Authors

Edna B. Foa
Edna B. Foa University of Pennsylvania
H. Blair Simpson
H. Blair Simpson Columbia University
Martin E. Franklin
Martin E. Franklin University of Pennsylvania
Jonathan S. Abramowitz
Jonathan S. Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jonathan D. Huppert
Jonathan D. Huppert Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gail Steketee
Gail Steketee Boston University
Richard J. McNally
Richard J. McNally Harvard University
Michelle G. Newman
Michelle G. Newman Pennsylvania State University
Debra A. Hope
Debra A. Hope University of Nebraska–Lincoln
C. Barr Taylor
C. Barr Taylor Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a variety of fulfilling careers, especially in counseling and therapy settings. One popular pathway is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a profession seeing steady demand across the USA.

The journey to becoming an MFT typically begins with earning a bachelor’s degree, followed by a master’s in marriage and family therapy or a related field. Each state and city may have distinct requirements. For instance, those interested in learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in Louisville will need to meet specific educational and licensure standards set by Kentucky. Similarly, reviewing how to become a marriage and family therapist in Madison can provide guidance tailored to Wisconsin.

If you’re considering Texas, familiarize yourself with Lubbock mft education requirements, as they outline the coursework, clinical experience, and exams needed. You can also learn more about how to become an mft in Memphis for Tennessee-specific pathways and professional opportunities.

Completing a relevant online degree is a flexible way to meet these requirements—offering the freedom to balance studies with personal or professional responsibilities while advancing toward a rewarding career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Kozak

Recently Published Articles