World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael D. McGoon

Michael D. McGoon

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13378 12589 6803 6289 246 54565

Michael D. McGoon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael D. McGoon between 1977 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael D. McGoon published across 44 years, from 1977 to 2020, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2009. 4 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2009. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication
1977 2020

250 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael D. McGoon: publications per year, 1977 to 2020
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 5
1983 2
1984 8
1985 7
1986 3
1987 5
1988 4
1989 4
1990 3
1991 3
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 5
1997 3
1998 2
1999 4
2000 2
2001 3
2002 3
2003 7
2004 7
2005 5
2006 12
2007 11
2008 8
2009 21
2010 18
2011 21
2012 20
2013 10
2014 14
2015 6
2016 3
2017 4
2018 3
2019 3
2020 1
Total 250
Download as CSV

Michael D. McGoon publications per year - data summary

  • Michael D. McGoon, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, has 250 publications recorded across 44 years, from 1977 to 2020.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1977 and the most recent to 2020.
  • The most productive years are 2009 and 2011, with 21 publications each.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2020, with 1 publication.
  • 4 of the 44 years in the span carry no publications at all (1978, 1979, 1980 and 1981).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.3 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2016-2020) hold 14 publications, 6% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1977-1991: 46 publications (3.1 per year); 1992-2006: 61 publications (4.1 per year); 2007-2020: 143 publications (10.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Michael D. McGoon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. McGoon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 246 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 246
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael D. McGoon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Michael D. McGoon, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, records 246 publications - the 7th percentile of the discipline.
  • 7% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Michael D. McGoon, and about 93% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Michael D. McGoon ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Michael D. McGoon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. McGoon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Michael D. McGoon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Michael D. McGoon, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, records 87 D-Index - the 34th percentile of the discipline.
  • 34% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Michael D. McGoon, and about 66% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Michael D. McGoon ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Michael D. McGoon is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their work is situated within a prestigious clinical and research environment known for contributions to medical science and patient care.

The scientist's recent research output does not include listed paper titles, publication venues, or citation counts in the available data.

There is no information provided about frequent co-authors or collaborative partnerships in their work.

The data does not specify any regular publication venues associated with Michael D. McGoon's research activities.

Similarly, there is no record of book publications connected to this scientist.

No details are available about specific main fields of study, subfields, or key topics addressed in their research.

There is no indication of awards or honors granted to Michael D. McGoon.

The scientist is currently living, and their career affiliations suggest ongoing involvement in clinical practice or research at Mayo Clinic.

Best Publications

  • ACCF/AHA 2009 Expert Consensus Document on Pulmonary Hypertension: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association: Developed in Collaboration With the American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Inc., and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association

    Vallerie V. McLaughlin;Stephen L. Archer;David B. Badesch;Robyn J. Barst

  • A Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Epoprostenol (Prostacyclin) with Conventional Therapy for Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

    Robyn J. Barst;Lewis J. Rubin;Walker A. Long;Michael D. McGoon

  • Valvular Heart Disease Associated with Fenfluramine–Phentermine

    Heidi M. Connolly;Jack L. Crary;Michael D. McGoon;Donald D. Hensrud

  • Predicting Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Insights From the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL)

    Raymond L. Benza;Dave P. Miller;Mardi Gomberg-Maitland;Robert P. Frantz

  • Diagnosis and Assessment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

    David B. Badesch;Hunter C. Champion;Miguel Angel Gomez Sanchez;Marius M. Hoeper

  • Primary pulmonary hypertension: natural history and the importance of thrombosis.

    V Fuster;P M Steele;W D Edwards;B J Gersh

  • ACCF/AHA 2009 Expert Consensus Document on Pulmonary Hypertension

    Vallerie V. McLaughlin;Stephen L. Archer;David B. Badesch;Robyn J. Barst

  • Right Ventricular Function and Failure Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Right Heart Failure

    Norbert F. Voelkel;Robert A. Quaife;Leslie A. Leinwand;Robyn J. Barst

  • Continuous intravenous epoprostenol for pulmonary hypertension due to the scleroderma spectrum of disease. A randomized, controlled trial.

    David B. Badesch;Victor F. Tapson;Michael D. McGoon;Bruce H. Brundage

  • Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Robyn J Barst;Michael McGoon;Adam Torbicki;Olivier Sitbon

  • Ambrisentan for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Results of the Ambrisentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Efficacy (ARIES) Study 1 and 2

    Nazzareno Galiè;Horst Olschewski;Ronald J. Oudiz;Fernando Torres

  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension : Baseline Characteristics From the REVEAL Registry

    David B. Badesch;Gary E. Raskob;C. Greg Elliott;Abby M. Krichman

  • Screening, Early Detection, and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Michael McGoon;David Gutterman;Virginia Steen;Robin Barst

  • Long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

    Joseph G. Murphy;Bernard J. Gersh;Douglas D. Mair;Valentin Fuster

  • The natural history of lone atrial fibrillation. A population-based study over three decades.

    Stephen L. Kopecky;Bernard J. Gersh;Michael D. McGoon;Jack P. Whisnant

  • Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function

    Chuwa Tei;Chuwa Tei;Karl S. Dujardin;Karl S. Dujardin;David O. Hodge;David O. Hodge;Kent R. Bailey;Kent R. Bailey

  • An Evaluation of Long-term Survival From Time of Diagnosis in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension From the REVEAL Registry

    Raymond L. Benza;Dave P. Miller;Robyn J. Barst;David B. Badesch

  • Long-term outcome after surgical repair of isolated atrial septal defect. Follow-up at 27 to 32 years

    Joseph G. Murphy;Bernard J. Gersh;Michael D. McGoon;Douglas D. Mair

  • Treatment of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension with Continuous Intravenous Prostacyclin (Epoprostenol): Results of a Randomized Trial

    Lewis J. Rubin;Jessica Mendoza;Michele Hood;Michael McGoon

  • Beraprost therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Robyn J. Barst;Michael McGoon;Vallerie McLaughlin;Victor Tapson

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Badesch
David B. Badesch University of Colorado Denver
Robyn J. Barst
Robyn J. Barst Columbia University
Lewis J. Rubin
Lewis J. Rubin University of California, San Diego
Victor F. Tapson
Victor F. Tapson Duke University
Robert C. Bourge
Robert C. Bourge University of Alabama at Birmingham
David L. Hayes
David L. Hayes Mayo Clinic
Stuart Rich
Stuart Rich Northwestern University
D. Dunbar Ivy
D. Dunbar Ivy University of Colorado Denver
Horst Olschewski
Horst Olschewski Medical University of Graz
Gary E. Raskob
Gary E. Raskob University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are diverse online degree pathways that support both clinical and non-clinical careers in healthcare. Many students pursue rn to fnp programs to become Family Nurse Practitioners, combining advanced clinical skills with the flexibility of online study.

Nutrition is another expanding field in health sciences. Earning a online nutrition degree can lead to roles in health education, clinical nutrition, and wellness coaching.

For those interested in healthcare administration, consider exploring the cahme accredited online mha programs list. These programs train students for leadership positions while allowing professionals to continue their careers alongside their studies.

Alternatively, nurses looking to expand their qualifications can select rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, which offer a flexible way to upgrade skills without additional clinical requirements.

These versatile, accredited online degrees can build a solid foundation for medical and healthcare careers, helping you tailor your education to fit your unique professional interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael D. McGoon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles