D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 34 Citations 6,849 95 World Ranking 4363 National Ranking 2194

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Social psychology
  • Statistics

Melvin M. Mark mostly deals with Cognitive psychology, Social psychology, Persuasion, Cognition and Mood. His Cognitive psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Interpersonal communication, Econometrics and Action. His study on Social psychology is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Construct.

His Persuasion research includes elements of Cued speech, Higher education, Attribution and Attitude change. Melvin M. Mark interconnects Valence and Low arousal theory in the investigation of issues within Cognition. In his work, Task, Mechanism, Audiology and Heuristics is strongly intertwined with Affect, which is a subfield of Mood.

His most cited work include:

  • EFFECTS OF PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS WITH ADULT CANCER PATIENTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS (772 citations)
  • Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs (266 citations)
  • The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence (214 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Social psychology, Program evaluation, Evaluation methods, Oral history and Clinical psychology are his primary areas of study. His Generalizability theory research extends to the thematically linked field of Social psychology. The concepts of his Program evaluation study are interwoven with issues in Qualitative research, Pedagogy, Management science and Theory of change.

His research integrates issues of Psychosocial, Psychiatry and Longitudinal study in his study of Clinical psychology. Melvin M. Mark has researched Persuasion in several fields, including Cognitive psychology and Attitude change. He combines subjects such as Psychological intervention and Randomized experiment with his study of Social support.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (22.12%)
  • Program evaluation (22.12%)
  • Evaluation methods (12.50%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Oral history (9.62%)
  • Professional development (5.77%)
  • Medical education (6.73%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Melvin M. Mark focuses on Oral history, Professional development, Medical education, Evaluation methods and Evaluation theory. His research in Oral history intersects with topics in Program evaluation and Faculty development. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Social psychology, Gerontology and Media studies.

Combining a variety of fields, including Evaluation methods, Operations management, Program development, Life cycle costing, Career development and Presentation, are what the author presents in his essays. His Evaluation theory investigation overlaps with Research evaluation, Logic model, Linear logic, Explication and Artificial intelligence. His Research evaluation research overlaps with other disciplines such as Management science, Stakeholder, Accountability, Causal model and Prosocial behavior.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Planning Evaluation through the Program Life Cycle. (27 citations)
  • Mixed and Multimethods in Predominantly Quantitative Studies, Especially Experiments and Quasi-Experiments (10 citations)
  • Credible and Actionable Evidence: The Foundation of Rigorous and Influential Evaluations (9 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social science
  • Social psychology
  • Statistics

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Knowledge management, Statistical physics, Foundation, Public relations and Engineering ethics.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

EFFECTS OF PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS WITH ADULT CANCER PATIENTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS

Thomas J. Meyer;Melvin M. Mark.
Health Psychology (1995)

1198 Citations

Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs

Melvin M. Mark;Gary T. Henry;George Julnes.
(2000)

811 Citations

Beyond Use: Understanding Evaluation’s Influence on Attitudes and Actions

Gary T. Henry;Melvin M. Mark.
American Journal of Evaluation (2003)

531 Citations

The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence

Melvin M. Mark;Gary T. Henry.
Evaluation (2004)

468 Citations

The influence of mood state on judgment and action: Effects on persuasion, categorization, social justice, person perception, and judgmental accuracy

Robert C. Sinclair;Melvin M. Mark.
(1992)

331 Citations

Mood-Related Persuasion Depends on (Mis)Attributions

Robert C. Sinclair;Melvin M. Mark;Gerald L. Clore.
Social Cognition (1994)

257 Citations

The effects of mood state on judgemental accuracy: Processing strategy as a mechanism

Robert C. Sinclair;Melvin M. Mark.
Cognition & Emotion (1995)

210 Citations

Color as an environmental processing cue: External affective cues can directly affect processing strategy without affecting mood.

Alexander S. Soldat;Robert C. Sinclair;Melvin M. Mark.
Social Cognition (1997)

189 Citations

Stakeholder-Based Evaluation and Value Judgments:

Melvin M. Mark;R. Lance Shotland.
Evaluation Review (1985)

151 Citations

What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice

Stewart I. Donaldson;Christina A. Christie;Melvin M. Mark.
(2008)

146 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Melvin M. Mark

Norbert Schwarz

Norbert Schwarz

University of Southern California

Publications: 29

J. Bradley Cousins

J. Bradley Cousins

University of Ottawa

Publications: 15

Ian J. Deary

Ian J. Deary

University of Edinburgh

Publications: 13

Gerald L. Clore

Gerald L. Clore

University of Virginia

Publications: 13

Gerald Matthews

Gerald Matthews

University of Central Florida

Publications: 13

Andrew J. Elliot

Andrew J. Elliot

University of Rochester

Publications: 12

Lawrence J. Sanna

Lawrence J. Sanna

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications: 12

Thomas Gilovich

Thomas Gilovich

Cornell University

Publications: 11

Phyllis Butow

Phyllis Butow

University of Sydney

Publications: 11

Jennifer C. Greene

Jennifer C. Greene

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 10

Barry D. Bultz

Barry D. Bultz

University of Calgary

Publications: 9

Dale Griffin

Dale Griffin

University of British Columbia

Publications: 9

Jeff Dunn

Jeff Dunn

University of Southern Queensland

Publications: 9

Kerry S. Courneya

Kerry S. Courneya

University of Alberta

Publications: 9

Charles W. Given

Charles W. Given

Michigan State University

Publications: 9

David A. Cole

David A. Cole

Vanderbilt University

Publications: 8

Trending Scientists

William Layton

William Layton

University of Pittsburgh

Jesús Carrera

Jesús Carrera

Spanish National Research Council

Dong-Yol Yang

Dong-Yol Yang

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

Krystyna Pyrzynska

Krystyna Pyrzynska

University of Warsaw

Caroline Müller

Caroline Müller

Bielefeld University

Esther H. Chang

Esther H. Chang

Georgetown University Medical Center

Kami Kim

Kami Kim

University of South Florida

Raymond J. Turner

Raymond J. Turner

University of Calgary

Udo Rüb

Udo Rüb

Goethe University Frankfurt

Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham

Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham

Carnegie Mellon University

Hans Op de Beeck

Hans Op de Beeck

Allen Institute for Brain Science

Katherine M. White

Katherine M. White

Queensland University of Technology

Beverly I. Fagot

Beverly I. Fagot

University of Oregon

Sanjay Gupta

Sanjay Gupta

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Philip E. Cryer

Philip E. Cryer

Washington University in St. Louis

Garry Robins

Garry Robins

University of Melbourne

Something went wrong. Please try again later.