World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness

Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 42 569 569 196 196 94 6281
Computer Science 45 7237 7027 959 953 92 7833

Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness between 2016 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness published across 11 years, from 2016 to 2026, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2022. 29 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2016 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2022. 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 33 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 1 publication
2016 2026

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness: publications per year, 2016 to 2026
Year Publications
2016 6
2017 2
2018 3
2019 13
2020 18
2021 27
2022 42
2023 24
2024 33
2025 28
2026 1
Total 197
Download as CSV

Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 92
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 45
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness is affiliated with Zhejiang Normal University in China. Their research contributions primarily intersect the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on specialized subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Media Technology.

The researcher's academic output includes numerous works concentrated in several key topics:

  • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI

Frequent publishing venues for Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness encompass a range of journals that include:

  • Mathematics
  • Neural Computing and Applications
  • IEEE Access
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Expert Systems with Applications

In addition to journal articles, their contributions extend to book chapters, with at least one publication through Springer Nature titled International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Science and Applications (CAISA) from 2023.

Key recent publications include:

  • Aquila Optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm (2021), published in Computers & Industrial Engineering
  • Optimization Method for Forecasting Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 in China (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • COVID-19 image classification using deep features and fractional-order marine predators algorithm (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • Green internet of things using UAVs in B5G networks: A review of applications and strategies (2021), published in Ad Hoc Networks
  • Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for solving real-world mechanical engineering design problems: a comprehensive survey, applications, comparative analysis, and results (2022), published in Neural Computing and Applications

The researcher collaborates extensively with coauthors, often working with:

  • Mohamed Abd Elaziz
  • Ahmed A. Ewees
  • Abdelghani Dahou
  • Laith Abualigah
  • Rehab Ali Ibrahim

Best Publications

  • Aquila Optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm

    Laith Mohammad Abualigah;Dalia Yousri;Mohamed Abd El-Aziz;Ahmed A. Ewees

  • Advanced Feature Extraction and Selection Approach Using Deep Learning and Aquila Optimizer for IoT Intrusion Detection System

    Unknown

  • Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for solving real-world mechanical engineering design problems: a comprehensive survey, applications, comparative analysis, and results

    Unknown

  • COVID-19 image classification using deep features and fractional-order marine predators algorithm.

    Ahmed T Sahlol;Dalia Yousri;Ahmed A Ewees;Mohammed A A Al-Qaness

  • Green internet of things using UAVs in B5G networks: A review of applications and strategies

    Saeed H. Alsamhi;Saeed H. Alsamhi;Fatemeh Afghah;Radhya Sahal;Ammar Hawbani

  • IoT Intrusion Detection System Using Deep Learning and Enhanced Transient Search Optimization

    Abdulaziz Fatani;Mohamed Abd Elaziz;Abdelghani Dahou;Mohammed A. A. Al-Qaness

  • Adaptive Machine Learning Based Distributed Denial-of-Services Attacks Detection and Mitigation System for SDN-Enabled IoT

    Unknown

  • An Improved Marine Predators Algorithm With Fuzzy Entropy for Multi-Level Thresholding: Real World Example of COVID-19 CT Image Segmentation

    Mohamed E. Abd Elaziz;Ahmed A. Ewees;Dalia Yousri;Husein S. Naji Alwerfali

  • Marine Predators Algorithm for Forecasting Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 in Italy, USA, Iran and Korea.

    Mohammed A A Al-Qaness;Ahmed A Ewees;Ahmed A Ewees;Hong Fan;Laith Abualigah

  • An improved deep learning model for predicting daily PM2.5 concentration

    Fei Xiao;Mei Yang;Hong Fan;Guanghui Fan

  • WiGeR: WiFi-Based Gesture Recognition System

    Mohammed Abdulaziz Aide Al-qaness;Fangmin Li

  • Optimized ANFIS Model Using Aquila Optimizer for Oil Production Forecasting

    Ayman Mutahar AlRassas;Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness;Ahmed A. Ewees;Shaoran Ren

  • An improved YOLO-based road traffic monitoring system

    Mohammed Abdulaziz Aide Al-qaness;Aaqif Afzaal Abbasi;Hong Fan;Rehab Ali Ibrahim

  • Human activity recognition using marine predators algorithm with deep learning

    Unknown

  • Improved Slime Mould Algorithm based on Firefly Algorithm for feature selection: A case study on QSAR model

    Ahmed A. Ewees;Laith Abualigah;Dalia Yousri;Zakariya Yahya Algamal

  • Improved Artificial Bee Colony Using Sine-Cosine Algorithm for Multi-Level Thresholding Image Segmentation

    Ahmed A. Ewees;Mohamed E. Abd Elaziz;Mohammed Abdulaziz Aide Al-qaness;Hassan A. Khalil

  • Efficient Artificial Intelligence Forecasting Models for COVID-19 Outbreak in Russia and Brazil.

    Mohammed A.A. Al-qaness;Amal I. Saba;Ammar H. Elsheikh;Mohamed Abd Elaziz

  • COVID-19 X-ray images classification based on enhanced fractional-order cuckoo search optimizer using heavy-tailed distributions

    Dalia Yousri;Mohamed Abd Elaziz;Laith Abualigah;Diego Oliva

  • Reliable applied objective for identifying simple and detailed photovoltaic models using modern metaheuristics: Comparative study

    Dalia Yousri;Mohamed Abd Elaziz;Diego Oliva;Diego Oliva;Laith Abualigah

  • Modeling of drilling process of GFRP composite using a hybrid random vector functional link network/parasitism-predation algorithm

    Ammar H. Elsheikh;Mohamed Abd Elaziz;B. Ramesh;Mohamed Egiza

  • Utilization of Random Vector Functional Link integrated with Marine Predators Algorithm for tensile behavior prediction of dissimilar friction stir welded aluminum alloy joints

    Mohamed Abd Elaziz;Taher A. Shehabeldeen;Taher A. Shehabeldeen;Ammar H. Elsheikh;Jianxin Zhou

  • Boosting Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm with Genetic Algorithm Operators for Feature Selection: Case Study on Cox Proportional Hazards Model

    Ahmed A. Ewees;Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness;Laith Abualigah;Diego Oliva

  • A Study of the Effects of Stemming Strategies on Arabic Document Classification

    Yousif A. Alhaj;Jianwen Xiang;Dongdong Zhao;Mohammed Abdulaziz Aide Al-qaness

  • Enhanced salp swarm algorithm based on firefly algorithm for unrelated parallel machine scheduling with setup times

    Ahmed A. Ewees;Ahmed A. Ewees;Mohammed A.A. Al-qaness;Mohamed Abd Elaziz

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohamed Abd Elaziz
Mohamed Abd Elaziz Ajman University of Science and Technology
Ahmed A. Ewees
Ahmed A. Ewees Damietta University
Dalia Yousri
Dalia Yousri Khalifa University
Laith Mohammad Abualigah
Laith Mohammad Abualigah Al al-Bayt University
Songfeng Lu
Songfeng Lu Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Diego Oliva
Diego Oliva University of Guadalajara
Amir Mosavi
Amir Mosavi Óbuda University
Robertas Damaševičius
Robertas Damaševičius Kaunas University of Technology
Mohsen Guizani
Mohsen Guizani Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Amir H. Gandomi
Amir H. Gandomi University of Technology Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in computer science, there are several online degrees with related career pathways to consider. Many students explore programs in cybersecurity, construction management, criminal justice, and accounting. These fields not only offer diverse job prospects but also benefit from a growing availability of flexible, affordable online degree options.

For those considering network protection and digital security, understanding cyber security online degree cost is key. Programs vary in price, so researching top options helps you budget wisely for your education. Similarly, those interested in leadership roles in building projects should explore online construction management degree cost to find programs that best fit their career goals and financial plans.

Students fascinated by law enforcement and legal systems might look for the best online criminal justice degree. Others with strengths in numbers and finance may find value in exploring an online accounting degree for strong job opportunities and advancement potential.

No matter your choice, online degrees open new doors and make it easier to balance study with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles