World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
12749
World Ranking
10329
National Ranking
5419

Leonard L. Martin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard L. Martin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leonard L. Martin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard L. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leonard L. Martin is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States and works primarily within the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their research contributions span several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's main research topics include the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Cultural Differences and Values, and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior.

Leonard L. Martin has published articles in the journal Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology. Two recent papers include:

  • "Snakes vs. Guns: a Systematic Review of Comparisons Between Phylogenetic and Ontogenetic Threats" (2021) in Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
  • "Affective Responses to Natural and Technological Disasters; An Evolutionary Perspective" (2023) in Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology

These publications reflect involvement in research examining evolutionary perspectives on human behavior and affective responses to various threats and disasters.

Frequent collaborators in Leonard L. Martin's work include Soheil Shapouri, with whom they have coauthored two papers, and Omid Arhami, with one joint publication.

Best Publications

  • Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis.

    Fritz Strack;Leonard L. Martin;Sabine Stepper

  • Some ruminative thoughts.

    Leonard L. Martin;Abraham Tesser

  • Mood as Input: People Have to Interpret the Motivational Implications of Their Moods

    Leonard L. Martin;David W. Ward;John W. Achee;Robert S. Wyer

  • The Construction of Social Judgments

    Leonard L. Martin;Abraham Tesser

  • Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression.

    Leonard L. Martin;John J. Seta;Rick A. Crelia

  • Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction

    Fritz Strack;Leonard L. Martin;Norbert Schwarz

  • Set/reset: use and disuse of concepts in impression formation.

    Leonard L. Martin

  • Theories of Mood and Cognition : A User's Guidebook

    Leonard L. Martin;Gerald L. Clore

  • Thinking, Judging, and Communicating: A Process Account of Context Effects in Attitude Surveys

    Fritz Strack;Leonard L. Martin

  • Toward a motivational and structural theory of ruminative thought.

    Leonard L. Martin;Abraham Tesser

  • Striving and Feeling : Interactions Among Goals, Affect, and Self-regulation

    Leonard L. Martin;Abraham Tesser

  • How would it feel if...? Mood as input to a role fulfillment evaluation process.

    Leonard L. Martin;Teresa Abend;Constantine Sedikides;Jeffrey D. Green

  • The Role of Mood in Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects of Performance: Single or Multiple Mechanisms?

    Edward R. Hirt;Gary M. Levine;Hugh E. McDonald;R.Jeffrey Melton

  • The psychology of evaluation.

    Abraham Tesser;Leonard Martin

  • On the substitutability of self-protective mechanisms

    Abraham Tesser;Leonard L. Martin;David P. Cornell

  • The Smell of Bias: What Instigates Correction Processes in Social Judgments?

    Diederik A. Stapel;Leonard L. Martin;Norbert Schwarz

  • Wanting but not having: The effects of unattained goals on thoughts and feelings.

    Leonard L. Martin;Abraham Tesser;William D. McIntosh

  • The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency.

    Abraham Tesser;Leonard Martin;Marilyn Mendolia

  • Mood as Input: What We Think About How We Feel Determines How We Think

    Leonard L. Martin;Abraham Tesser

  • The Gargle Effect Rinsing the Mouth With Glucose Enhances Self-Control

    Matthew A. Sanders;Steve D. Shirk;Chris J. Burgin;Leonard L. Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Abraham Tesser
Abraham Tesser University of Georgia
Gerald L. Clore
Gerald L. Clore University of Virginia
Fritz Strack
Fritz Strack University of Würzburg
Diederik A. Stapel
Diederik A. Stapel Tilburg University
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Edward R. Hirt
Edward R. Hirt Indiana University
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Michael D. Robinson
Michael D. Robinson North Dakota State University
Maya Tamir
Maya Tamir Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ian McGregor
Ian McGregor University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized pathways. Popular options include marriage and family therapy, school counseling, and organizational psychology. Many students opt for online programs for their flexibility and accessibility, especially if they plan to practice in different states.

It’s important to understand state-specific licensure and certification requirements before choosing your path. For example, if you’re interested in learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in Plano, there are unique educational and clinical practice standards you must meet. Similarly, those wondering about Port St. Lucie mft certification requirements will find different guidelines to follow.

Other regions have their own procedures, such as the training required if you want to know how to become a marriage and family therapist in Portland or how to become a marriage and family therapist in Raleigh. Researching these pathways helps you prepare for a rewarding career in psychology that aligns with your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard L. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles