World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
59793
World Ranking
11634
National Ranking
893

Edwin M. Southern publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin M. Southern sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Edwin M. Southern D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin M. Southern sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • 1990 - Canada Gairdner International Award
  • 1988 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1983 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Edwin M. Southern is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and has contributed to research primarily within Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their recent research includes the paper titled The Kirkhouse Trust: Successes and Challenges in Twenty Years of Supporting Independent, Contemporary Grain Legume Breeding Projects in India and African Countries published in 2024 in the journal Plants.

Their work encompasses key topics such as agricultural pest management studies, genetic and environmental crop studies, and agronomic practices and intercropping systems.

  • Agricultural pest management studies
  • Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Edwin M. Southern's main fields of study focus on agricultural and biological sciences with subfields including plant science and agronomy and crop science.

  • Plant Science
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

The scientist frequently publishes in the journal Plants.

  • Plants

They have collaborated with several coauthors, including Claudia Canales Holzeis, Paul Gepts, R. M. D. Koebner, P. Mathur, and Sonia Morgan.

  • Claudia Canales Holzeis
  • Paul Gepts
  • R. M. D. Koebner
  • P. Mathur
  • Sonia Morgan

Throughout their career, Edwin M. Southern has been recognized with several awards and honors:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (2012)
  • Canada Gairdner International Award (1990)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1988)
  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom (1983)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Best Publications

  • Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.

    E.M. Southern

  • Apparatus and method for analyzing polynucleotide sequences and method of generating oligonucleotide arrays

    Edwin Southern

  • Molecular interactions on microarrays

    Edwin Southern;Kalim Mir;Mikhail Shchepinov

  • Analyzing and comparing nucleic acid sequences by hybridization to arrays of oligonucleotides: evaluation using experimental models.

    E.M. Southern;U. Maskos;J.K. Elder

  • Oligonucleotide hybridizations on glass supports: a novel linker for oligonucleotide synthesis and hybridization properties of oligonucleotides synthesised in situ.

    Uwe Maskos;Edwin M. Southern

  • Gel electrophoresis of restriction fragments.

    Edwin Southern

  • Support-bound oligonucleotides

    Edwin M. Southern;Uwe Maskos

  • Analysing polynucleotide sequences

    Edwin Southern

  • Steric Factors Influencing Hybridisation Of Nucleic Acids To Oligonucleotide Arrays

    M. S. Shchepinov;S. C. Case-Green;E. M. Southern

  • Measurement of DNA length by gel electrophoresis

    E.M. Southern

  • Long range periodicities in mouse satellite DNA.

    E.M. Southern

  • Base Sequence and Evolution of Guinea-pig α-Satellite DNA

    Southern Em

  • Arrays of complementary oligonucleotides for analysing the hybridisation behaviour of nucleic acids

    E M Southern;S C Case-Green;J K Elder;M Johnson

  • Selecting effective antisense reagents on combinatorial oligonucleotide arrays.

    Natalie Milner;Kalim U. Mir;Edwin M. Southern

  • Removal of repeated sequences from hybridisation probes

    Paul G. Sealey;Paul A. Whittaker;Edwin M. Southern

  • A model for the separation of large DNA molecules by crossed field gel electrophoresis

    E.M. Southern;R. Anand;W.R.A. Brown;D.S. Fletcher

  • The efficacy of small interfering RNAs targeted to the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) is influenced by secondary structure in the IGF1R transcript.

    Erin A. Bohula;Amanda J. Salisbury;Muhammad Sohail;Martin P. Playford

  • Method for analysing polynucleotide targets using tethered oligonucleotide probes

    Edwin Mellor Southern;Clare Elizabeth Pritchard;Stephen Charles Case-Green

  • Oligonucleotide dendrimers: synthesis and use as polylabelled DNA probes.

    M S Shchepinov;I A Udalova;A J Bridgman;E M Southern

  • Determining the influence of structure on hybridization using oligonucleotide arrays.

    Kalim U. Mir;Edwin M. Southern

Frequent Co-Authors

William Brown
William Brown University of Nottingham
Ben Berkhout
Ben Berkhout University of Amsterdam
Frank Marken
Frank Marken University of Bath
Ulf Landegren
Ulf Landegren Uppsala University
Tim Hunt
Tim Hunt University of Cambridge
Mark D. Fricker
Mark D. Fricker University of Oxford
Irina A. Udalova
Irina A. Udalova University of Oxford
Noreen E. Murray
Noreen E. Murray University of Edinburgh
Ivo Gut
Ivo Gut Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to several fulfilling and flexible career paths. Many students are now considering affordable online MBA healthcare management programs. These specialized online degrees can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, biotech companies, and research institutions—while saving on tuition costs.

Another popular option is medical coding and billing, a vital part of the healthcare system with growing demand for trained professionals. Understanding the distinctions between a certified professional coder and other industry certifications is key when choosing a pathway. Certified coders ensure accurate billing and coding for patient records, impacting both care quality and insurance processing.

Wondering about potential earnings? The what is medical coding salary page highlights that entry-level salaries are competitive, with room to grow as you gain experience and certifications.

If you prefer remote or flexible work, you might also ask: is medical billing and coding a good career? For many, it offers job security, advancement, and a chance to play a crucial support role in modern healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin M. Southern

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles