World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
54098
World Ranking
6831
National Ranking
3149

Mark S. Chee publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Chee sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 141 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark S. Chee D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Chee sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark S. Chee is affiliated with Illumina in the United States. Their research work spans several areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, demonstrating a focus on molecular biology, infectious diseases, animal science and zoology, general health professions, and finance.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Jason T. Ladner, Sierra N. Henson, Annalee S. Boyle, Anna Engelbrektson, and Zane Fink.

Their work has been published in several scientific venues, such as:

  • Cell Reports Medicine
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine

Selected recent papers by Mark S. Chee include:

  • Epitope-resolved profiling of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response identifies cross-reactivity with endemic human coronaviruses, 2021, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Risk Factors for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Homeless Shelters in Chicago, Illinois-March-May, 2020, 2020, Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • Epitope-resolved profiling of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response identifies cross-reactivity with an endemic human CoV, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • National Cancer Institute Think-Tank Meeting Report on Proteomic Cartography and Biomarkers at the Single-Cell Level: Interrogation of Premalignant Lesions, 2020, Journal of Proteome Research
  • Physician and Nurse Practitioner Attitudes on Generic Prescribing of Oral Contraceptive Pills and Antidepressants, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine

Best Publications

  • Expression monitoring by hybridization to high density oligonucleotide arrays

    David J. Lockhart;Eugene L. Brown;Gordon G. Wong;Mark S. Chee

  • The International HapMap Project

    John W. Belmont;Paul Hardenbol;Thomas D. Willis;Fuli Yu

  • A haplotype map of the human genome

    John W. Belmont;Andrew Boudreau;Suzanne M. Leal;Paul Hardenbol

  • A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs

    Kelly A. Frazer;Dennis G. Ballinger;David R. Cox;David A. Hinds

  • Large-Scale Identification, Mapping, and Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Human Genome

    David G. Wang;Jian-Bing Fan;Jian-Bing Fan;Chia-Jen Siao;Chia-Jen Siao;Anthony Berno;Anthony Berno

  • Accessing Genetic Information with High-Density DNA Arrays

    Mark Chee;Robert Yang;Earl Hubbell;Anthony Berno

  • Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations

    Pardis C. Sabeti;Pardis C. Sabeti;Patrick Varilly;Patrick Varilly;Ben Fry;Jason Lohmueller

  • A genome-wide scalable SNP genotyping assay using microarray technology.

    Kevin L Gunderson;Frank J Steemers;Grace Lee;Leo G Mendoza

  • Arrays of nucleic acid probes on biological chips

    Mark Chee;Maureen T. Cronin;Stephen P. A. Fodor;Thomas R. Gingeras

  • Detection of heterozygous mutations in BRCA1 using high density oligonucleotide arrays and two-colour fluorescence analysis.

    Joseph G. Hacia;Lawrence C. Brody;Mark S. Chee;Stephen P.A. Fodor

  • Extensive polymorphisms observed in HIV–1 clade B protease gene using high–density oligonucleotide arrays

    Michael J. Kozal;Nila Shah;Naiping Shen;Robert Yang

  • High-throughput DNA methylation profiling using universal bead arrays

    Marina Bibikova;Zhenwu Lin;Lixin Zhou;Eugene Chudin

  • BeadArray technology: enabling an accurate, cost-effective approach to high-throughput genotyping.

    Arnold Oliphant;David L Barker;John R Stuelpnagel;Mark S Chee

  • Detection of nucleic acid amplification reactions using bead arrays

    Mark S. Chee;Kevin Gunderson

  • Using oligonucleotide probe arrays to access genetic diversity

    R. J. Lipshutz;D. Morris;M. Chee;E. Hubbell

  • Highly parallel genomic assays

    Jian-Bing Fan;Mark S Chee;Kevin L Gunderson

  • Composite array using microsphere

    Steven R Auger;Mark S Chee;John R Stuelpnagel;ジョン・アール・スチュールプネイゲル

  • Human cytomegalovirus UL97 open reading frame encodes a protein that phosphorylates the antiviral nucleoside analogue ganciclovir.

    Edward Littler;Amanda D. Stuart;Mark S. Chee

  • Nucleic acid analysis techniques

    David J. Lockhart;Mark Chee;Kevin Gunderson;Chaoqiang Lai

  • Detection of nucleic acid reactions on bead arrays

    Kevin Gunderson;John R. Stuelpnagel;Mark S. Chee

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Gingeras
Thomas R. Gingeras Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Anthony W. Czarnik
Anthony W. Czarnik Illumina (United States)
David J. Lockhart
David J. Lockhart ReCode Therapeutics
Jian-Bing Fan
Jian-Bing Fan Illumina (United States)
Lincoln Stein
Lincoln Stein Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Thomas J. Hudson
Thomas J. Hudson Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
David Altshuler
David Altshuler Harvard University
Francis S. Collins
Francis S. Collins National Institutes of Health
Mark J. Daly
Mark J. Daly Massachusetts General Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Biology and Biochemistry, a wide range of online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and clinical practice. For those interested in nursing, the rn to bsn online no clinicals pathway offers a flexible, practice-focused approach that eliminates the need for on-site clinical hours, making it ideal for working professionals.

Ambitious students seeking leadership roles might explore the fastest online master's in healthcare administration, allowing you to move quickly into managerial roles within medical and research settings. If your interests lean toward mental health, consider a fast track mental health nursing program for advanced clinical skills focused on psychiatric care.

For those keen on nutrition science, a 2 year nutrition degree online can rapidly prepare you for roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, or food science. Together, these online degree options provide flexible and efficient routes for turning your passion in Biology or Biochemistry into a thriving career in science or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Chee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles