World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
McKay Moore Sohlberg

McKay Moore Sohlberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6965 6494 3772 3430 114 7947

McKay Moore Sohlberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by McKay Moore Sohlberg between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. McKay Moore Sohlberg published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2019. 4 of the 119 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2019. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 8 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

119 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
McKay Moore Sohlberg: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 1
1989 4
1990 0
1991 1
1992 3
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 5
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 1
2005 8
2006 2
2007 5
2008 4
2009 4
2010 3
2011 8
2012 4
2013 4
2014 3
2015 5
2016 5
2017 3
2018 2
2019 9
2020 5
2021 4
2022 2
2023 0
2024 2
2025 2
Total 119
Download as CSV

McKay Moore Sohlberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where McKay Moore Sohlberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 114
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

McKay Moore Sohlberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where McKay Moore Sohlberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

McKay Moore Sohlberg is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on topics within medicine, with a significant emphasis on traumatic brain injury research. Over their career, they have contributed extensively to the understanding and treatment of brain injury and related cognitive rehabilitation.

The main fields of study for Sohlberg include medicine, with particular subfields being:

  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology

Their work covers several main topics such as:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Resilience and Mental Health

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Sohlberg include:

  • Social Communication Following Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review of Theoretical Models, 2020, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Identification of Key Therapy Ingredients for SLPs Serving on Multidisciplinary Teams Facilitating Return to Learn for Students With Prolonged Cognitive Effects After Concussion, 2020, Topics in Language Disorders
  • Interprofessional collaboration and communication to facilitate implementation of cognitive rehabilitation in persons with brain injury, 2022, Journal of Interprofessional Care
  • Interprofessional Collaborative Management of Postconcussion Cognitive Symptoms, 2021, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • The Implementation of a Personalized Dynamic Approach for the Management of Prolonged Concussion Symptoms, 2021, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Pauline A. Mashima, Lindsey Byom, Therese M. O'Neil-Pirozzi, Rik Lemoncello, and Peter Meulenbroek. The main publication venues where Sohlberg's work appears most often are:

  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care
  • Topics in Language Disorders
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychological Approach

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Catherine A. Mateer

  • Effectiveness of an attention-training program

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Catherine A. Mateer

  • Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation : theory and practice

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Catherine A. Mateer

  • Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations

    Mary R T Kennedy;Carl Coelho;Lyn Turkstra;Mark Ylvisaker

  • Evaluation of Attention Process Training and Brain Injury Education in Persons with Acquired Brain Injury

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Karen A. McLaughlin;Antonella Pavese;Anke Heidrich

  • Training use of compensatory memory books: A three stage behavioral approach

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Catherine A. Mateer

  • Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: A systematic review of the evidence

    Mark Ylvisaker;Lyn Turkstra;Carl Coehlo;Kathy Yorkston

  • Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation

    M Sohlberg;C Mateer

  • Practice guidelines for direct attention training

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Jack Avery;Mary Kennedy;Mark Ylvisaker

  • Focus on clinical research: Perceptions of memory function in individuals with closed-head injury.

    Catherine A. Mateer;McKay Moore Sohlberg;Jeff Crinean

  • Optimizing Cognitive Rehabilitation: Effective Instructional Methods

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Lyn S. Turkstra

  • Proposed Criteria for Appraising Goal Attainment Scales Used as Outcome Measures in Rehabilitation Research

    Agata Krasny-Pacini;Agata Krasny-Pacini;Jonathan Evans;McKay Moore Sohlberg;Mathilde Chevignard

  • Improving attention and managing attentional problems. Adapting rehabilitation techniques to adults with ADD.

    McKAY Moore Sohlberg;Catherine A. Mateer

  • Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: what have we learned in the past 20 years?

    Laurie A. Ehlhardt;Mckay Moore Sohlberg;Mary Kennedy;Carl Coelho

  • Instructional techniques in cognitive rehabilitation: a preliminary report.

    Mc Kay Moore Sohlberg;Laurie Ehlhardt;Mary Kennedy

  • PC-RE: a method for personal and contextual requirements engineering with some experience

    Alistair Sutcliffe;Stephen Fickas;McKay Moore Sohlberg

  • A comparison of four prompt modes for route finding for community travellers with severe cognitive impairments.

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Stephen Fickas;Pei-Fang Hung;Andrew Fortier

  • Personal and contextual requirements engineering

    A. Sutcliffe;S. Fickas;M.M. Sohlberg

  • Practice guidelines for standardized assessment for persons with traumatic brain injury

    Lyn Turkstra;Mark Ylvisaker;Carl Coelho;Mary Kennedy

  • Evidence-based practice for the use of external aids as a memory compensation technique

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Mary Kennedy;Jack Avery;Carl Coelho

  • Contemporary approaches to the management of executive control dysfunction

    McKay Moore Sohlberg;Catherine A. Mateer;Donald T. Mateer

  • Cognitive Rehabilitation Manual: Translating Evidence-Based Recommendations into Practice

    McKay Moore Sohlberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine A. Mateer
Catherine A. Mateer University of Victoria
Lyn S. Turkstra
Lyn S. Turkstra McMaster University
Mark Ylvisaker
Mark Ylvisaker College of Saint Rose
Shari L. Wade
Shari L. Wade Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Carl A. Coelho
Carl A. Coelho University of Connecticut
Alistair Sutcliffe
Alistair Sutcliffe University of Manchester
Robert H. Horner
Robert H. Horner University of Oregon
Michael I. Posner
Michael I. Posner University of Oregon
Kathryn M. Yorkston
Kathryn M. Yorkston University of Washington
John R. Seeley
John R. Seeley University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a career in psychology opens doors to a variety of pathways, including counseling, clinical practice, and research. For those interested in becoming a licensed counselor, there are now more options than ever to fast-track your education and gain relevant credentials online.

Many states offer accelerated programs that can help you start your career sooner. For instance, the Pennsylvania fastest counseling programs are designed for individuals seeking an efficient route to licensure. Similarly, if you live in or near Rhode Island, you can explore the Rhode Island fastest counseling programs that combine flexibility with quality training.

Those considering education in the South may want to look into South Carolina accelerated counseling programs, which help aspiring counselors gain experience quickly. Additionally, the fastest way to become a counselor in South Dakota provides guidance on earning your counseling license efficiently.

Online degrees and fast-track programs present unique opportunities for psychology students hoping to enter the workforce faster, making it easier to pursue your passion and serve your community.

Best Scientists Citing McKay Moore Sohlberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles