World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthias Eder

Matthias Eder

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 8915 8232 748 710 99 7999

Matthias Eder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias Eder between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias Eder published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 8 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias Eder: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 3
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 1
2003 6
2004 4
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 10
2010 2
2011 10
2012 8
2013 12
2014 7
2015 4
2016 5
2017 3
2018 3
2019 0
2020 0
2021 2
2022 3
2023 1
2024 5
2025 3
Total 109
Download as CSV

Matthias Eder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Eder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 99 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 99
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias Eder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Eder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthias Eder is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields including Molecular Biology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Genetics, Physiology, and Biological Psychiatry.

The core topics of their work focus on stress responses and cortisol, tryptophan and brain disorders, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, adipose tissue and metabolism, circadian rhythm and melatonin, heat shock proteins research, and treatment of major depression.

Their recent papers cover a range of subjects and have appeared in significant journals. Notable publications include:

  • The co-chaperone Fkbp5 shapes the acute stress response in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of male mice, 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Ketamine exerts its sustained antidepressant effects via cell-type-specific regulation of Kcnq2, 2022, Neuron
  • Massively parallel functional dissection of schizophrenia-associated noncoding genetic variants, 2023, Cell
  • Loss of the psychiatric risk factor SLC6A15 is associated with increased metabolic functions in primary hippocampal neurons, 2020, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Tripartite extended amygdala-basal ganglia CRH circuit drives locomotor activation and avoidance behavior, 2022, Science Advances

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Matthias Eder include Danusa Menegaz, Jan M. Deussing, Juan Pablo López, Rossella Di Giaimo, and Alon Chen. This network highlights a pattern of collaborative work across related areas of neuroscience and molecular biology.

Their work has been published repeatedly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Psychiatry, Nature Communications, Neuron, and Cell. This demonstrates a focus on both preprint dissemination and peer-reviewed journal contributions.

Best Publications

  • CB1 cannabinoid receptors and on-demand defense against excitotoxicity.

    Giovanni Marsicano;Sharon Goodenough;Sharon Goodenough;Krisztina Monory;Heike Hermann

  • Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain.

    Hans-Ulrich Dodt;Ulrich Leischner;Anja Schierloh;Nina Jährling;Nina Jährling

  • The endocannabinoid system controls key epileptogenic circuits in the hippocampus.

    Krisztina Monory;Federico Massa;Federico Massa;Michaela Egertová;Matthias Eder

  • The Role of m6A/m-RNA Methylation in Stress Response Regulation

    Mareen Engel;Carola Eggert;Paul M. Kaplick;Matthias Eder

  • Glutamatergic and Dopaminergic Neurons Mediate Anxiogenic and Anxiolytic Effects of CRHR1

    Damian Refojo;Martin Schweizer;Claudia Kuehne;Stefanie Ehrenberg

  • Activation of the cannabinoid receptor type 1 decreases glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission in the lateral amygdala of the mouse

    Shahnaz Christina Azad;Matthias Eder;Giovanni Marsicano;Beat Lutz

  • Association of FKBP51 with Priming of Autophagy Pathways and Mediation of Antidepressant Treatment Response: Evidence in Cells, Mice, and Humans

    Nils C. Gassen;Jakob Hartmann;Jürgen Zschocke;Jens Stepan

  • Cross-disorder risk gene CACNA1C differentially modulates susceptibility to psychiatric disorders during development and adulthood

    N Dedic;M L Pöhlmann;J S Richter;D Mehta

  • Nectin-3 links CRHR1 signaling to stress-induced memory deficits and spine loss

    Xiao-Dong Wang;Yun-Ai Su;Klaus V Wagner;Charilaos Avrabos

  • Precisely localized LTD in the neocortex revealed by infrared-guided laser stimulation.

    H.-U. Dodt;M. Eder;A. Frick;W. Zieglgänsberger

  • Ketamine exerts its sustained antidepressant effects via cell-type-specific regulation of Kcnq2

    Unknown

  • The Rab5 guanylate exchange factor Rin1 regulates endocytosis of the EphA4 receptor in mature excitatory neurons.

    Katrin Deininger;Matthias Eder;Edgar R. Kramer;Walter Zieglgänsberger

  • Ucn3 and CRF-R2 in the medial amygdala regulate complex social dynamics

    Yair Shemesh;Yair Shemesh;Oren Forkosh;Oren Forkosh;Mathias Mahn;Sergey Anpilov;Sergey Anpilov

  • The co-chaperone Fkbp5 shapes the acute stress response in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of male mice

    Alexander S Häusl;Lea M Brix;Jakob Hartmann;Max L Pöhlmann

  • Functional optical probing of the hippocampal trisynaptic circuit in vitro: network dynamics, filter properties, and polysynaptic induction of CA1 LTP.

    Jens Stepan;Julien Dine;Matthias Eder

  • Neocortical Long-Term Potentiation and Long-Term Depression: Site of Expression Investigated by Infrared-Guided Laser Stimulation

    Matthias Eder;Walter Zieglgänsberger;Hans-Ulrich Dodt

  • Tranexamic acid impairs γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type A-mediated synaptic transmission in the murine amygdala: a potential mechanism for drug-induced seizures?

    Stephan Kratzer;Hedwig Irl;Corinna Mattusch;Martina Bürge

  • Intranasally Administered Neuropeptide S (NPS) Exerts Anxiolytic Effects Following Internalization Into NPS Receptor-Expressing Neurons

    Irina A Ionescu;Julien Dine;Yi-Chun Yen;Dominik R Buell

  • Tumor suppressor down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma 1 (DRR1) is a stress-induced actin bundling factor that modulates synaptic efficacy and cognition

    Mathias V. Schmidt;Jan-Philip Schülke;Claudia Liebl;Michael Stiess

  • Infrared-guided laser stimulation of neurons in brain slices.

    Hans-Ulrich Dodt;Matthias Eder;Anja Schierloh;Walter Zieglgänsberger

  • CRF receptor type 2 neurons in the posterior bed nucleus of the stria terminalis critically contribute to stress recovery

    M. J A G Henckens;Y. Printz;U. Shamgar;J. Dine

  • Isoflurane modulates glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission in the amygdala.

    Andreas Ranft;Jörg Kurz;Jörg Kurz;Martin Deuringer;Martin Deuringer;Rainer Haseneder;Rainer Haseneder

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter Zieglgänsberger
Walter Zieglgänsberger Max Planck Society
Gerhard Rammes
Gerhard Rammes Technical University of Munich
Florian Holsboer
Florian Holsboer Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
Jan M. Deussing
Jan M. Deussing Max Planck Society
Alon Chen
Alon Chen Weizmann Institute of Science
Mathias V. Schmidt
Mathias V. Schmidt Max Planck Society
Carsten T. Wotjak
Carsten T. Wotjak Max Planck Society
Wolfgang Wurst
Wolfgang Wurst German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Rainer Landgraf
Rainer Landgraf Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways. For those looking to build specialized skills quickly, online certificate programs can offer targeted training in neuroscience, psychology, or healthcare—often leading to well-paying roles in a short period.

If you’re seeking a more flexible approach, consider the easiest bachelor degree to get online in relevant fields such as psychology or biology. These programs often provide foundational knowledge for a neuroscience career and can be ideal for those balancing studies with other commitments.

For advanced roles in mental health, an MSW (Master of Social Work) supports professionals aiming to work in neurotherapy or community settings. Many universities offer accredited msw online programs to help make this graduate pathway affordable and accessible.

Those interested in behavior analysis may pursue bcba certification through affordable online coursework. This credential is valuable in clinical, educational, and research settings related to behavioral neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Eder

Trending Scientists