World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
27
Citations
4244
World Ranking
2761
National Ranking
220

Matthew C. Leach publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew C. Leach sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 57 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Matthew C. Leach D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew C. Leach sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 27 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration.

    Emanuela Dalla Costa;Michela Minero;Dirk Lebelt;Diana Stucke

  • Defining and assessing animal pain

    Lynne U. Sneddon;Robert W. Elwood;Shelley A. Adamo;Matthew C. Leach

  • Evaluation of EMLA cream for preventing pain during tattooing of rabbits: changes in physiological, behavioural and facial expression responses.

    Unknown

  • Environmental enrichment induces optimistic cognitive bias in rats

    Nichola M. Brydges;Matthew Leach;Katie Nicol;Rebecca Wright

  • Development of a facial expression scale using footrot and mastitis as models of pain in sheep

    Krista M. McLennan;Carlos J.B. Rebelo;Murray J. Corke;Mark A. Holmes

  • Development of a Piglet Grimace Scale to Evaluate Piglet Pain Using Facial Expressions Following Castration and Tail Docking: A Pilot Study.

    Unknown

  • The Mouse Grimace Scale: A Clinically Useful Tool?

    Amy L. Miller;Matthew C. Leach

  • The Assessment of Facial Expressions in Piglets Undergoing Tail Docking and Castration: Toward the Development of the Piglet Grimace Scale.

    Pierpaolo Di Giminiani;Victoria L. M. H. Brierley;Annalisa Scollo;Flaviana Gottardo

  • Aversion to gaseous euthanasia agents in rats and mice.

    Unknown

  • Using the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) to Assess Pain Associated with Acute Laminitis in Horses (Equus caballus)

    Unknown

  • Coding and quantification of a facial expression for pain in lambs.

    Unknown

  • Fish sentience denial: Muddying the waters

    Lynne U. Sneddon;Javier Lopez-Luna;David C.C. Wolfenden;Matthew C. Leach

  • Are We Looking in the Wrong Place? Implications for Behavioural-Based Pain Assessment in Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculi) and Beyond?

    Unknown

  • Handling method alters the hedonic value of reward in laboratory mice.

    Jasmine M. Clarkson;Dominic M. Dwyer;Paul A. Flecknell;Matthew C. Leach

  • The composition and initial evaluation of a grimace scale in ferrets after surgical implantation of a telemetry probe.

    Unknown

  • Conceptual and methodological issues relating to pain assessment in mammals: The development and utilisation of pain facial expression scales

    Krista M. McLennan;Amy L. Miller;Emanuela Dalla Costa;Diana Stucke

  • Rhesus macaque personality, dominance, behavior, and health.

    Lauren M. Robinson;Kristine Coleman;John P. Capitanio;Daniel H. Gottlieb

  • Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier

    Unknown

  • Chimpanzees with positive welfare are happier, extraverted, and emotionally stable

    Lauren M. Robinson;Drew M. Altschul;Emma K. Wallace;Yulán Úbeda

  • Characterization of short- and long-term mechanical sensitisation following surgical tail amputation in pigs.

    Pierpaolo Di Giminiani;Sandra A. Edwards;Emma M. Malcolm;Matthew C. Leach

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities for those interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies. For example, students may choose to study exercise science online, which connects animal health to physical fitness and rehabilitation. This interdisciplinary approach enhances understanding of biomechanics and physiology in both humans and animals.

Behavioral skills are also vital in veterinary and animal science careers, making a behavioral analysis degree a relevant option. This degree focuses on behavior management techniques applicable to animals and humans alike.

For those interested in psychological aspects, pursuing nasp accredited school psychology programs offers insights into mental health and learning behavior, which can translate to animal behavior studies and welfare.

Additionally, advanced degrees like apa accredited psyd programs online provide training in clinical psychology that can support veterinary professionals working with animal-assisted therapy or behavioral consultations.

Recently Published Articles