World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
8919
World Ranking
8768
National Ranking
538

Martin Rother publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Rother sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 92 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin Rother D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Rother sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Rother is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Molecular Biology, Geophysics, Oceanography, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Geology.

The scientist's research topics cover diverse areas such as Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods, Earthquake Detection and Analysis, Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics, Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics, and Geological and Geophysical Studies.

Notable recent publications by Martin Rother include:

  • International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation, 2021, Earth Planets and Space
  • Observing Earth's magnetic environment with the GRACE-FO mission, 2021, Earth Planets and Space
  • Evaluation of candidate models for the 13th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 2020, Research Square (Research Square)
  • The Mag.num core field model as a parent for IGRF-13, and the recent evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly, 2021, Earth Planets and Space
  • GRACE-FO calibrated and characterized magnetometer data, 2020, GFZ Data Services

The most frequent publication venues for this researcher are Earth Planets and Space, Research Square (Research Square), Space Weather, GFZ Data Services, and Lectures.

Among the frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin Rother are Claudia Stolle, Monika Korte, Foteini Vervelidou, Patrick Alken, and Erwan Thébault. Collaboration counts indicate multiple joint papers with these colleagues, with Claudia Stolle and Monika Korte as the most recurrent partners.

Best Publications

  • International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation

    Erwan Thébault;Christopher C. Finlay;Ciarán D. Beggan;Patrick Alken;Patrick Alken

  • International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the eleventh generation

    C. C. Finlay;S. Maus;C. D. Beggan;T. N. Bondar

  • International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation

    P. Alken;P. Alken;E. Thébault;C. D. Beggan;H. Amit

  • The Swarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility (SCARF) and Swarm data products

    Nils Olsen;Eigil Friis-Christensen;Rune Floberghagen;Patrick Alken;Patrick Alken

  • CHAOS—a model of the Earth's magnetic field derived from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC‐C magnetic satellite data

    Nils Olsen;Hermann Lühr;Terence J. Sabaka;Mioara Mandea

  • Thermospheric up‐welling in the cusp region: Evidence from CHAMP observations

    H. Lühr;M. Rother;W. Köhler;P. Ritter

  • Magnetic signatures of equatorial spread F as observed by the CHAMP satellite

    Claudia Stolle;Hermann Lühr;Martin Rother;G. Balasis

  • Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements

    S. Maus;S. Maus;F. Yin;H. Lühr;C. Manoj;C. Manoj

  • The influence of nonmigrating tides on the longitudinal variation of the equatorial electrojet

    H. Lühr;M. Rother;K. Häusler;P. Alken

  • The 10th generation international geomagnetic reference field

    S. Maus;S. Macmillan;T. Chernova;S. Choi

  • RPC-MAG The Fluxgate Magnetometer in the ROSETTA Plasma Consortium

    Karl-Heinz Glassmeier;Ingo Richter;Andrea Diedrich;Günter Musmann

  • Noon-time equatorial electrojet: Its spatial features as determined by the CHAMP satellite

    H. Lühr;S. Maus;M. Rother

  • GRIMM: the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model based on vector satellite and observatory data

    Vincent Lesur;Ingo Wardinski;Martin Rother;Mioara Mandea

  • Third generation of the Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth (POMME)

    S. Maus;S. Maus;Martin Rother;Claudia Stolle;W. Mai

  • Earth's lithospheric magnetic field determined to spherical harmonic degree 90 from CHAMP satellite measurements

    Stefan Maus;Martin Rother;Kumar Hemant;Claudia Stolle

  • First scalar magnetic anomaly map from CHAMP satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field

    S. Maus;M. Rother;R. Holme;H. Lühr

  • Fifth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite measurements

    Stefan Maus;Hermann Lühr;Martin Rother;Kumar Hemant

  • The 9th-Generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field

    S. Macmillan;S. Maus;T. Bondar;A. Chambodut

  • The diamagnetic effect of the equatorial Appleton anomaly: Its characteristics and impact on geomagnetic field modeling

    H. Lühr;M. Rother;S. Maus;W. Mai

  • The second generation of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model: GRIMM-2

    V. Lesur;I. Wardinski;M. Hamoudi;M. Rother

  • GJI Geomagnetism, rock magnetism and palaeomagnetism GRIMM: the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model based on vector satellite and observatory data

    Vincent Lesur;Ingo Wardinski;Martin Rother;Mioara Mandea

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Maus
Stefan Maus University of Colorado Denver
Hermann Lühr
Hermann Lühr University of Potsdam
Vincent Lesur
Vincent Lesur Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Claudia Stolle
Claudia Stolle Leibniz Institute of Atmospheric Physics at the Rostock University
Nils Olsen
Nils Olsen Technical University of Denmark
Mioara Mandea
Mioara Mandea Centre National D'Etudes Spatiales
Erwan Thébault
Erwan Thébault University of Nantes
Terence J. Sabaka
Terence J. Sabaka Goddard Space Flight Center
Richard Holme
Richard Holme University of Liverpool
Christopher C. Finlay
Christopher C. Finlay Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities and provide a well-rounded educational experience. Programs like an online general studies degree affordable offer a flexible and cost-effective way to gain foundational knowledge while complementing specialized skills in environmental fields.

If you're weighing your options, considering what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get may help you select a path that aligns with your strengths and learning style. Several environmental-related programs are designed to be accessible without compromising career relevance.

Specialized degrees such as a geology degree are closely tied to environmental science careers. Check out listings of the best online geology degree programs to find top-quality education that can lead to roles in resource management, conservation, and research.

Another in-demand skill is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), critical for analyzing environmental data. Many institutions offer comprehensive GIS programs. Explore colleges with colleges with gis programs to enhance your expertise and career readiness in this evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Rother

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles