World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
4468
World Ranking
9176
National Ranking
347

Mark Quigley publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Quigley sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark Quigley D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Quigley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Quigley is a researcher affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia, specializing in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on geophysics. Their work spans several subfields including Civil and Structural Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Atmospheric Science, and aspects of Management, Monitoring, Policy, and Law.

Their research concentrates on earthquake and tectonic studies, geological and geochemical analysis, and seismic waves and analysis. Additional areas of interest include geology and paleoclimatology research, landslides and related hazards, high-pressure geophysics and materials, and disaster management and resilience.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Brendan Duffy, Haibin Yang, Dan Clark, Tamarah King, and Robert Langridge.

Mark Quigley has published multiple papers across several venues. Notable publication venues with recurring contributions are Environment Systems & Decisions, Geosciences, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Tectonophysics, and the Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth.

Representative recent papers by Mark Quigley include:

  • A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises, 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions
  • Effects of Earthquakes on Flood Hazards: A Case Study From Christchurch, New Zealand, 2020, Geosciences

Other relevant papers from Quigley's network of research collaborators (not authored by Quigley but indicating research context) include:

  • Surface slip distributions and geometric complexity of intraplate reverse-faulting earthquakes, 2021, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • New developments in onshore paleoseismic methods, and their impact on Quaternary tectonic studies, 2023, Quaternary International
  • Rupture Characteristics and Bedrock Structural Control of the 2016 Mw 6.0 Intraplate Earthquake in the Petermann Ranges, Australia, 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Best Publications

  • Surface rupture during the 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake: Implications for fault rupture dynamics and seismic-hazard analysis

    M. Quigley;R. Van Dissen;N. Litchfield;P. Villamor

  • Recurrent liquefaction in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the Canterbury earthquake sequence

    Mark C. Quigley;Sarah Bastin;Brendon A. Bradley

  • Present-day stresses, seismicity and Neogene-to-Recent tectonics of Australia’s ‘passive’ margins: intraplate deformation controlled by plate boundary forces

    Richard R. Hillis;Mike Sandiford;Scott D. Reynolds;Scott D. Reynolds;Mark C. Quigley

  • Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (New Zealand) earthquake

    M. Cubrinovski;R. Green;J. Allen;S. Ashford

  • The 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence: Environmental effects, seismic triggering thresholds and geologic legacy

    Mark C. Quigley;Mark C. Quigley;Matthew W. Hughes;Brendon A. Bradley;Sjoerd van Ballegooy

  • Tectonic geomorphology of Australia

    Mark C. Quigley;Dan Clark;Mike Sandiford

  • Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake

    Misko Cubrinovski;Russell A. Green;John Allen;Scott Ashford

  • Quaternary faults of south-central Australia: Palaeoseismicity, slip rates and origin

    M. C. Quigley;M. L. Cupper;M. Sandiford

  • Modes of active intraplate deformation, Flinders Ranges, Australia

    Julien Célérier;Julien Célérier;Mike Sandiford;David Lundbek Hansen;David Lundbek Hansen;Mark Quigley

  • Ground Motion and Seismic Source Aspects of the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence

    Brendon A. Bradley;Mark C. Quigley;Russ J. Van Dissen;Nicola J. Litchfield

  • U-Pb SHRIMP zircon geochronology and T- t- d history of the Kampa Dome, southern Tibet

    M. Quigley;Y. Liangjun;Courtney Gregory;A. Corvino

  • A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises.

    Mark C Quigley;Mark C Quigley;Januka Attanayake;Andrew King;Fabian Prideaux

  • SURFACE RUPTURE OF THE GREENDALE FAULT DURING THE DARFIELD (CANTERBURY) EARTHQUAKE, NEW ZEALAND: INITIAL FINDINGS

    M. Quigley;R. Van Dissen;P. Villamor;N. Litchfield

  • Distinguishing tectonic from climatic controls on range-front sedimentation

    M. C. Quigley;M. Sandiford;M. L. Cupper

  • The sinking city: Earthquakes increase flood hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand

    MW Hughes;MC Quigley;S Van Ballegooy;BL Deam

  • Neogene structural evolution of the Sierra San Felipe, Baja California: Evidence for proto-gulf transtension in the Gulf Extensional Province?

    Christian Seiler;John M. Fletcher;Mark C. Quigley;Andrew J.W. Gleadow

  • Bedrock erosion and relief production in the northern Flinders Ranges, Australia

    Mark Quigley;Michael. A Sandiford;L Keith Fifield;Abaz Alimanovic

  • Paleoseismology of the 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake source, Greendale Fault, New Zealand

    S. Hornblow;M. Quigley;A. Nicol;R. Van Dissen

  • Fault kinematics and surface deformation across a releasing bend during the 2010 MW 7.1 Darfield, New Zealand, earthquake revealed by differential LiDAR and cadastral surveying

    Brendan Duffy;Mark Quigley;David J.A. Barrell;Russ Van Dissen

  • 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology of the Kampa Dome, southern Tibet: Implications for tectonic evolution of the North Himalayan gneiss domes

    Mark Quigley;Yu Liangjun;Liu Xiaohan;Christopher J.L. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Mike Sandiford
Mike Sandiford University of Melbourne
Brendon A. Bradley
Brendon A. Bradley University of Canterbury
Pilar Villamor
Pilar Villamor GNS Science
R. Van Dissen
R. Van Dissen GNS Science
Christopher J. White
Christopher J. White University of Queensland
Kevin P. Furlong
Kevin P. Furlong Pennsylvania State University
Russell A. Green
Russell A. Green Virginia Tech
L. Keith Fifield
L. Keith Fifield Australian National University
Jarg R. Pettinga
Jarg R. Pettinga University of Canterbury

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related degrees can open diverse career opportunities. An increasing number of learners are turning to geology degrees online to gain a deeper understanding of Earth processes, which is vital for fields like environmental consulting and natural resource management.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a crucial role in environmental mapping and data analysis. Enrolling in one of the best GIS undergraduate programs provides technical skills highly sought after in urban planning, conservation, and climate research.

For those interested in public sector leadership or policy-making that influences environmental initiatives, pursuing a degree from top online programs such as the top online MPA programs can be a strategic choice. These programs prepare students to manage public resources efficiently and implement sustainable policies.

Environmental challenges also intersect with social factors, making a bachelors degree in sociology online valuable for understanding community impacts and promoting environmental justice. Together, these related online degrees strengthen multidisciplinary approaches to solving environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Quigley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles