World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Michael E. Oskin publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Oskin sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Michael E. Oskin D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Oskin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Michael E. Oskin is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a notable concentration in geophysics. Additional subfields of study include atmospheric science, artificial intelligence, management, monitoring, policy and law, and earth-surface processes.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Geological and geochemical analysis
  • Geology and paleoclimatology research
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Seismology and earthquake studies
  • Seismic waves and analysis

Michael E. Oskin has published extensively in multiple venues, including:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • UNC Libraries
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Oskin include:

  • The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • Documentation of Surface Fault Rupture and Ground-Deformation Features Produced by the 4 and 5 July 2019 Mw 6.4 and Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence (2020, Seismological Research Letters)
  • Accrual of widespread rock damage from the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes (2022, Nature Geoscience)
  • Airborne Lidar and Electro-Optical Imagery along Surface Ruptures of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence, Southern California (2020, Seismological Research Letters)
  • Late Pleistocene slip rate of the central Haiyuan fault constrained from optically stimulated luminescence, 14C, and cosmogenic isotope dating and high-resolution topography (2020, Geological Society of America Bulletin)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Oskin include:

  • Alba M. Rodríguez Padilla
  • Yiran Wang
  • K. W. Hudnut
  • Youli Li
  • Elaine Young

Among honors received, Oskin was named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2005.

Best Publications

  • The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

    Tom G. Farr;Paul A. Rosen;Edward Caro;Robert Crippen

  • Decoupling of erosion and precipitation in the Himalayas

    D. W. Burbank;A. E. Blythe;J. Putkonen;B. Pratt-Sitaula

  • Effects of bedrock landslides on cosmogenically determined erosion rates

    Nathan A. Niemi;Nathan A. Niemi;Michael Oskin;Douglas W. Burbank;Arjun M. Heimsath

  • Near-Field Deformation from the El Mayor–Cucapah Earthquake Revealed by Differential LIDAR

    Michael E. Oskin;J Ramon Arrowsmith;Alejandro Hinojosa Corona;Austin J. Elliott

  • Community Fault Model (CFM) for Southern California

    Andreas Plesch;John H. Shaw;Christine Benson;William A. Bryant

  • Rapid localization of Pacific–North America plate motion in the Gulf of California

    Michael Oskin;Joann Stock;Arturo Martín-Barajas

  • Exhumation of basement‐cored uplifts: Example of the Kyrgyz Range quantified with apatite fission track thermochronology

    Edward R. Sobel;Michael Oskin;Douglas Burbank;Alexander Mikolaichuk

  • Assembly of a large earthquake from a complex fault system: Surface rupture kinematics of the 4 April 2010 El Mayor–Cucapah (Mexico) Mw 7.2 earthquake

    John M. Fletcher;Orlando J. Teran;Thomas K. Rockwell;Michael E. Oskin

  • Pacific–North America plate motion and opening of the Upper Delfín basin, northern Gulf of California, Mexico

    Michael Oskin;Joann Stock

  • Elevated shear zone loading rate during an earthquake cluster in eastern California

    Michael Oskin;Lesley Perg;Eitan Shelef;Michael Strane

  • Marine incursion synchronous with plate-boundary localization in the Gulf of California

    Michael Oskin;Joann Stock

  • Pulsed exhumation of interior eastern Tibet: Implications for relief generation mechanisms and the origin of high-elevation planation surfaces

    Huiping Zhang;Michael E. Oskin;Jing Liu-Zeng;Peizhen Zhang;Peizhen Zhang

  • Slip rate of the Calico fault: Implications for geologic versus geodetic rate discrepancy in the Eastern California Shear Zone

    Michael Oskin;Lesley Perg;Dylan Blumentritt;Sujoy Mukhopadhyay

  • Bedload-to-suspended load ratio and rapid bedrock incision from Himalayan landslide-dam lake record

    Breth Pratt-Sitaula;Michelle Garde;Douglas W. Burbank;Michael Oskin

  • Alpine landscape evolution dominated by cirque retreat

    Michael Oskin;Douglas W. Burbank

  • Large-magnitude transient strain accumulation on the Blackwater fault, Eastern California shear zone

    Michael Oskin;Alex Iriondo

  • Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from Japanese Mw ∼7 intraplate earthquakes

    Edwin Nissen;Tadashi Maruyama;J Ramon Arrowsmith;John R. Elliott

  • Inherited strike-slip faults as an origin for basement-cored uplifts: Example of the Kungey and Zailiskey ranges, northern Tian Shan

    Jacob Selander;Michael Oskin;Cholponbek Ormukov;Kanatbek Abdrakhmatov

  • Oblique rifting ruptures continents: Example from the Gulf of California shear zone

    Scott E.K. Bennett;Michael E. Oskin

  • Rupture termination at restraining bends: The last great earthquake on the Altyn Tagh Fault

    Austin J. Elliott;Austin J. Elliott;Michael E. Oskin;Jing Liu-Zeng;Yanxiu Shao

  • Long-term continental deformation associated with transpressive plate motion: The San Andreas fault

    James A. Spotila;Nathan Niemi;Robert Brady;Martha House

  • Deformation processes adjacent to active faults: Examples from eastern California

    Eitan Shelef;Michael Oskin

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas K. Rockwell
Thomas K. Rockwell San Diego State University
Rebecca J. Dorsey
Rebecca J. Dorsey University of Oregon
Jing Liu-Zeng
Jing Liu-Zeng Tianjin University
Kenneth W. Hudnut
Kenneth W. Hudnut United States Geological Survey
Douglas W. Burbank
Douglas W. Burbank University of California, Santa Barbara
Edwin Nissen
Edwin Nissen University of Victoria
J Ramón Arrowsmith
J Ramón Arrowsmith Arizona State University
Nathan A. Niemi
Nathan A. Niemi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joann M. Stock
Joann M. Stock California Institute of Technology
Bernd Hamann
Bernd Hamann University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens up diverse career opportunities, but many students and professionals also explore complementary fields to enhance their expertise. For example, veterans interested in broadening their skills may find online programs like the online spanish bachelor degree for veterans valuable for expanding communication abilities that benefit global environmental work.

Creative professionals or those seeking to integrate artistic perspectives into environmental education might consider an online mfa programs, which offer flexible study options that complement scientific knowledge.

For those aiming to move into leadership or administrative roles within scientific organizations, pursuing an online masters programs in human resource management can be a strategic step. These degrees equip professionals with skills to manage teams and navigate organizational challenges effectively.

Additionally, lifelong learners and seniors interested in Earth Science or related disciplines can explore college degrees for seniors, which provide flexible and accessible education paths tailored to mature students’ needs.

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. Oskin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles