World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 42 1786 1654 676 589 133 10544

Mark H. Carpenter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark H. Carpenter between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark H. Carpenter published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2019. 6 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2019. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1983 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark H. Carpenter: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 1
1991 3
1992 2
1993 2
1994 6
1995 4
1996 1
1997 2
1998 4
1999 4
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 4
2004 0
2005 7
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 4
2010 7
2011 5
2012 2
2013 8
2014 4
2015 5
2016 5
2017 5
2018 6
2019 14
2020 2
2021 1
2022 1
2023 3
2024 3
2025 3
Total 147
Download as CSV

Mark H. Carpenter publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Carpenter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 133 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130 133
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark H. Carpenter D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark H. Carpenter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107 42
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Additive Runge-Kutta Schemes for Convection-Diffusion-Reaction Equations

    Christopher A. Kennedy;Mark H. Carpenter

  • Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes

    Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Saul Abarbanel

  • Low-storage, Explicit Runge-Kutta Schemes for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations

    Christopher A. Kennedy;Mark H. Carpenter;R. Michael Lewis

  • Fourth-order 2N-storage Runge-Kutta schemes

    Mark H. Carpenter;Christopher A. Kennedy

  • Several new numerical methods for compressible shear-layer simulations

    Unknown

  • The Stability of Numerical Boundary Treatments for Compact High-Order Finite-Difference Schemes

    Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Saul Abarbanel

  • A Stable and Conservative Interface Treatment of Arbitrary Spatial Accuracy

    Mark H Carpenter;Jan Nordström;David Gottlieb

  • High-order entropy stable finite difference schemes for nonlinear conservation laws

    Travis C. Fisher;Mark H. Carpenter

  • Entropy Stable Spectral Collocation Schemes for the Navier--Stokes Equations: Discontinuous Interfaces

    Mark H. Carpenter;Travis C. Fisher;Eric J. Nielsen;Steven H. Frankel

  • Implicit Time Integration Schemes for the Unsteady Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations: Laminar Flow

    Hester Bijl;Mark H. Carpenter;Veer N. Vatsa;Christopher A. Kennedy

  • A stable high-order finite difference scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, far-field boundary conditions

    Magnus Svärd;Mark H. Carpenter;Jan Nordström

  • A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable WENO schemes

    Nail K. Yamaleev;Mark H. Carpenter

  • Boundary and Interface Conditions for High-Order Finite-Difference Methods Applied to the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations

    Jan Nordström;Mark H Carpenter

  • The theoretical accuracy of Runge-Kutta time discretizations for the initial boundary value problem: a study of the boundary error

    Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Saul Abarbanel;Wai Sun Don

  • Application of implicit-explicit high order Runge-Kutta methods to discontinuous-Galerkin schemes

    Alex Kanevsky;Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Jan S. Hesthaven

  • High-order finite difference methods, multidimensional linear problems, and curvilinear coordinates

    Jan Nordström;Mark H. Carpenter

  • Discretely conservative finite-difference formulations for nonlinear conservation laws in split form: Theory and boundary conditions

    Travis C. Fisher;Mark H. Carpenter;Jan NordströM;Nail K. Yamaleev

  • Third-order Energy Stable WENO scheme

    Nail K. Yamaleev;Mark H. Carpenter

  • Accuracy of Shock Capturing in Two Spatial Dimensions

    Unknown

  • Spectral Methods on Arbitrary Grids

    Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Nordström
Jan Nordström Linköping University
David Gottlieb
David Gottlieb Brown University
Chau-Lyan Chang
Chau-Lyan Chang Langley Research Center
Meelan M. Choudhari
Meelan M. Choudhari Langley Research Center
Mujeeb R. Malik
Mujeeb R. Malik Langley Research Center
Steven H. Frankel
Steven H. Frankel Xavier University
David W. Zingg
David W. Zingg University of Toronto
Christopher L. Rumsey
Christopher L. Rumsey Langley Research Center
David E. Keyes
David E. Keyes King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Jan S. Hesthaven
Jan S. Hesthaven Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring mechanical and aerospace engineering opens doors to various related fields that complement these disciplines. For those interested in broadening their expertise, understanding the different career options, such as counseling roles within engineering teams or technical support services, is valuable. If you're curious about the type of counselors available, this resource offers insights that can help guide your career decisions toward specialized support roles.

For students seeking a quicker transition or additional credentials, there are options like the fastest and easiest counseling degree programs that provide streamlined pathways to certification. These programs can complement engineering expertise by enhancing communication and leadership skills within technical environments.

Accelerated education is also an option in specialized areas such as behavioral analysis. The bcba accelerated program is an example of how focused, fast-paced master's degrees can be pursued online, offering professionals flexibility while expanding their knowledge base.

Lastly, for engineers considering a shift into communication sciences or therapy-related fields, understanding slp graduate programs — their requirements and acceptance rates — can be essential for planning this transition effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Mark H. Carpenter

Recently Published Articles