World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
50
Citations
19794
World Ranking
1050
National Ranking
489

David Gottlieb publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Gottlieb sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 167 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David Gottlieb D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Gottlieb sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - John von Neumann Lecturer
  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

David Gottlieb was affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on medicine, with a particular emphasis on hematology, oncology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology as subfields of study.

The scientist's work covered several main topics including:

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Virus-based gene therapy research

David Gottlieb published extensively, with recent notable papers including:

  • Investigation of product-derived lymphoma following infusion of piggyBac-modified CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells, 2021, Blood
  • Development of CAR T-cell lymphoma in 2 of 10 patients effectively treated with piggyBac-modified CD19 CAR T cells, 2021, Blood
  • Zanubrutinib for the treatment of patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 3 years of follow-up, 2020, Blood
  • Pooled safety analysis of zanubrutinib monotherapy in patients with B-cell malignancies, 2021, Blood Advances
  • Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid and Spike T-Cell Epitopes for Assessing T-Cell Immunity, 2020, Journal of Virology

Their research appeared frequently in specific publication venues including:

  • Blood
  • Cytotherapy
  • Internal Medicine Journal
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Blood Advances

David Gottlieb collaborated often with several coauthors throughout their career. Frequently mentioned partners included:

  • Emily Blyth
  • Matthew Greenwood
  • Nothing Hamad
  • Kenneth Micklethwaite
  • David Ritchie

They received recognition through awards such as the John von Neumann Lecturer in 2008 and were a Member of the National Academy of Sciences since 2007.

Best Publications

  • Numerical analysis of spectral methods : theory and applications

    David Gottlieb;Steven A. Orszag

  • SPECTRAL METHODS FOR TIME-DEPENDENT PROBLEMS.

    Jan S. Hesthaven;Sigal Gottlieb;David Gottlieb

  • Numerical analysis of spectral methods

    David Gottlieb;Steven A Orszag

  • On the Gibbs Phenomenon and Its Resolution

    David Gottlieb;Chi-Wang Shu

  • Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes

    Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Saul Abarbanel

  • CBMS-NSF REGIONAL CONFERENCE SERIES IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS

    D. Gottlieb;S. A. Orszag;Peter J. Huber;Fred S. Roberts

  • The Stability of Numerical Boundary Treatments for Compact High-Order Finite-Difference Schemes

    Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Saul Abarbanel

  • A Stable and Conservative Interface Treatment of Arbitrary Spatial Accuracy

    Mark H Carpenter;Jan Nordström;David Gottlieb

  • Numerical Analysis of Spectral Methods: Theory and Application (CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics)

    David Gottlieb;Steven A. Orszag;G. A. Sod

  • Spectral methods for hyperbolic problems

    D. Gottlieb;J. S. Hesthaven

  • Dissipative two-four methods for time-dependent problems

    David Gottlieb;Eli Turkel

  • On the Gibbs phenomenon I: recovering exponential accuracy from the Fourier partial sum of a nonperiodic analytic function

    David Gottlieb;Chi-Wang Shu;Alex Solomonoff;Hervé Vandeven

  • A Mathematical Analysis of the PML Method

    Saul Abarbanel;David Gottlieb

  • The theoretical accuracy of Runge-Kutta time discretizations for the initial boundary value problem: a study of the boundary error

    Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Saul Abarbanel;Wai Sun Don

  • Application of implicit-explicit high order Runge-Kutta methods to discontinuous-Galerkin schemes

    Alex Kanevsky;Mark H. Carpenter;David Gottlieb;Jan S. Hesthaven

  • Optimal time splitting for two- and three-dimensional navier-stokes equations with mixed derivatives

    Saul Abarbanel;David Gottlieb

  • Spectral Simulations of Electromagnetic Wave Scattering

    B. Yang;D. Gottlieb;J.S. Hesthaven

  • A STABLE PENALTY METHOD FOR THE COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS. I. OPEN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

    J. S. Hesthaven;D. Gottlieb

  • Regular Article: Well-posed Perfectly Matched Layers for Advective Acoustics

    S. Abarbanel;D. Gottlieb;J. S. Hesthaven

  • On the construction and analysis of absorbing layers in CEM

    Saul Abarbanel;David Gottlieb

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan S. Hesthaven
Jan S. Hesthaven Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Eli Turkel
Eli Turkel Tel Aviv University
Chi-Wang Shu
Chi-Wang Shu Brown University
Mark H. Carpenter
Mark H. Carpenter Langley Research Center
Roger Temam
Roger Temam Indiana University
Jan Nordström
Jan Nordström Linköping University
Eitan Tadmor
Eitan Tadmor University of Maryland, College Park
Brian W. Sheldon
Brian W. Sheldon Brown University
Max D. Gunzburger
Max D. Gunzburger Florida State University
Dongbin Xiu
Dongbin Xiu The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals enhance their skills by opting for a fastest mba online program which offers efficient completion timelines without compromising quality.

In addition to business-focused degrees, combining mathematical expertise with a master's degree in marketing can be advantageous. This synergy helps graduates tap into data analytics and market research roles where quantitative skills are highly valued.

For individuals seeking accelerated career advancement, 1 year mba programs are an excellent option. They provide intense, focused learning that complements a mathematical background, facilitating leadership roles in finance, consulting, and technology sectors.

Flexibility is key for many students, and understanding if can you transfer mba programs is possible can make a major difference. This allows learners to build upon prior coursework and tailor their education to meet evolving career goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing David Gottlieb

Recently Published Articles