World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven H. Frankel

Steven H. Frankel

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
4917
World Ranking
2995
National Ranking
1026

Steven H. Frankel publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven H. Frankel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 114 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 61 scientists 317–326 publications: 69 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 212 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Steven H. Frankel D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven H. Frankel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 125 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 106 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Direct numerical simulation of stenotic flows, Part 1: Steady flow

    Sonu S. Varghese;Steven H. Frankel;Paul F. Fischer

  • Aerodynamic transfer of energy to the vocal folds

    Scott L. Thomson;Luc Mongeau;Steven H. Frankel

  • Numerical Modeling of Pulsatile Turbulent Flow in Stenotic Vessels

    Sonu S. Varghese;Steven H. Frankel

  • Entropy Stable Spectral Collocation Schemes for the Navier--Stokes Equations: Discontinuous Interfaces

    Mark H. Carpenter;Travis C. Fisher;Eric J. Nielsen;Steven H. Frankel

  • Large eddy simulation of a nonpremixed reacting jet: Application and assessment of subgrid-scale combustion models

    Paul E. DesJardin;Steven H. Frankel

  • Direct numerical simulation of stenotic flows, Part 2 : Pulsatile flow.

    Sonu S. Varghese;Steven H. Frankel;Paul F. Fischer

  • Computational aeroacoustics of phonation, part I: Computational methods and sound generation mechanisms.

    Wei Zhao;Cheng Zhang;Steven H. Frankel;Luc Mongeau

  • Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent-Cavitation Interactions in a Venturi Nozzle

    Nagendra Dittakavi;Aditya Chunekar;Steven Frankel

  • Cavopulmonary assist for the univentricular Fontan circulation: von Kármán viscous impeller pump.

    Mark D. Rodefeld;Brandon Coats;Travis Fisher;Guruprasad A. Giridharan

  • Computational aeroacoustics of phonation, part II: Effects of flow parameters and ventricular folds.

    Cheng Zhang;Wei Zhao;Steven H. Frankel;Luc Mongeau

  • Two-dimensional large eddy simulation of soot formation in the near-field of a strongly radiating nonpremixed acetylene–air turbulent jet flame

    Paul E. Desjardin;Steven H. Frankel

  • Effects of trailing jet instability on vortex ring formation

    Wei Zhao;Steven H. Frankel;Luc G. Mongeau

  • Large eddy simulations of sound radiation from subsonic turbulent jets

    W. Zhao;S. H. Frankel;L. Mongeau

  • Large Eddy Simulations of Sound Radiation from Subsonic Turbulent Jets

    W. Zhao;S. H. Frankel;L. Mongeau

  • Experimental verification of the quasi-steady approximation for aerodynamic sound generation by pulsating jets in tubes

    Zhaoyan Zhang;Luc Mongeau;Steven H. Frankel

  • Modeling transition to turbulence in eccentric stenotic flows

    Sonu S. Varghese;Steven H. Frankel;Paul F. Fischer

  • Stochastic inlet conditions for large-eddy simulation of a fully turbulent jet

    David J. Glaze;Steven H. Frankel

  • Study of Spectral Noise Emissions from Standard Turbulent Nonpremixed Flames

    Kapil K. Singh;Steven H. Frankel;Jay P. Gore

  • Numerical simulations of compressible multicomponent and multiphase flow using a high-order targeted ENO (TENO) finite-volume method

    Ory Haimovich;Steven H. Frankel

  • High-order incompressible large-eddy simulation of fully inhomogeneous turbulent flows

    Dinesh A. Shetty;Travis C. Fisher;Aditya R. Chunekar;Steven H. Frankel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For instance, fields like applied behavior analysis offer specialized roles, and students may find programs such as the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis helpful for quick advancement in this area.

When considering graduate studies, it's important to understand application strategies. For example, aspiring speech-language pathologists often ask, how many slp grad schools should I apply to, balancing chances of acceptance against program fit to optimize success.

Choosing the right program can affect career trajectory and accessibility. Some students prioritize programs with less competitive admissions; looking into the easiest speech pathology programs to get into can guide applicants towards suitable options.

Cost is another critical factor in selecting an online degree. Understanding the financial aspect through resources like speech pathology degree cost online helps prospective students plan effectively and make informed decisions about their education investments.

Recently Published Articles