World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marjeta Čandek-Potokar

Marjeta Čandek-Potokar

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
36
Citations
4156
World Ranking
1658
National Ranking
1

Marjeta Čandek-Potokar publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marjeta Čandek-Potokar sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 187 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Marjeta Čandek-Potokar D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marjeta Čandek-Potokar sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Effects of age and/or weight at slaughter on longissimus dorsi muscle: Biochemical traits and sensory quality in pigs.

    M Candek-Potokar;B Zlender;L Lefaucheur;M Bonneau

  • Meta-analysis of the effect of immunocastration on production performance, reproductive organs and boar taint compounds in pigs

    N. Batorek;M. Čandek-Potokar;M. Bonneau;J. Van Milgen

  • Genomic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in European local pig breeds assessed with a high density SNP chip.

    Unknown

  • Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part I. Carcass and fresh meat

    Unknown

  • Lipid Deposition and Metabolism in Local and Modern Pig Breeds: A Review

    Unknown

  • Ability of NIR spectroscopy to predict meat chemical composition and quality - a review

    Unknown

  • Factors in pig production that impact the quality of dry-cured ham: a review

    Unknown

  • The effect of ripening time on the chemical, textural, volatile and sensorial traits of Bicep femoris and Semimembranosus muscles of the Slovenian dry-cured ham Kraški pršut.

    Unknown

  • Effect of slaughter weight and/or age on histological characteristics of pig longissimus dorsi muscle as related to meat quality.

    M. Čandek-Potokar;L. Lefaucheur;B. Z̆lender;M. Bonneau

  • Effect of feed restriction on hormones, performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in immunocastrated pigs.

    Nina Batorek;Martin Škrlep;Armelle Prunier;Armelle Prunier;Isabelle Louveau;Isabelle Louveau

  • Whole-genome sequencing of European autochthonous and commercial pig breeds allows the detection of signatures of selection for adaptation of genetic resources to different breeding and production systems

    Unknown

  • Pork quality, processing, and sensory characteristics of dry-cured hams as influenced by Duroc crossing and sex1

    Unknown

  • Accuracy of near infrared spectroscopy for prediction of chemical composition, salt content and free amino acids in dry-cured ham.

    Unknown

  • Predicting intramuscular fat content in pork and beef by near infrared spectroscopy

    Unknown

  • Diversity across major and candidate genes in European local pig breeds.

    Unknown

  • Effects of breed and slaughter weight on longissimus muscle biochemical traits and sensory quality in pigs

    Marjeta Čandek-Potokar;Božidar Žlender;Michel Bonneau

  • European Local Pig Breeds - Diversity and Performance. A study of project TREASURE

    Unknown

  • Predicting pork water-holding capacity with NIR spectroscopy in relation to different reference methods

    Unknown

  • PORK COLOR MEASUREMENT AS AFFECTED BY BLOOM TIME AND MEASUREMENT LOCATION

    Unknown

  • Effect of hydrolysable tannins on intestinal morphology, proliferation and apoptosis in entire male pigs

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Animal Science and Veterinary fields often explore related disciplines that complement their career goals. For those passionate about animal welfare and mental health, pursuing an online substance abuse counseling degree can open doors to supporting individuals dealing with addiction, including cases tied to animal abuse or neglect.

Another avenue to consider is the therapeutic support of families and communities through programs such as marriage and family therapy master's programs online. These programs equip students with skills to address family dynamics, which can indirectly impact animal care environments and promote healthier human-animal relationships.

For those aiming at advanced research or academic roles, the online phd counseling offers a flexible pathway to deepen expertise in behavioral sciences. This can complement veterinary practice through an enhanced understanding of animal behavior and client communication.

Ultimately, exploring careers with animals helps broaden the horizon for professionals seeking impactful work in various settings. From veterinary care to animal rehabilitation and conservation, integrating these education choices enriches career opportunities in this dynamic sector.

Recently Published Articles