World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mario Albrecht

Mario Albrecht

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
57
Citations
16804
World Ranking
3373
National Ranking
230

Mario Albrecht publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Albrecht sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 112 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Mario Albrecht D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Albrecht sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mario Albrecht is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research activities associated with this renowned institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications listed in the available data. Likewise, specific fields of study, subfields, main research topics, and awards have not been provided for this scientist.

Given the absence of detailed publication or research topic information, it is not possible to elaborate on the precise areas of specialization or contributions made by Mario Albrecht. The profile remains limited to the known institutional affiliation without specifics on scholarly output or collaboration networks.

Best Publications

  • A genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1

    Jochen Hampe;Andre Franke;Philip Rosenstiel;Philip Rosenstiel;Andreas Till

  • Computing topological parameters of biological networks

    Yassen Assenov;Fidel Ramírez;Sven-Eric Schelhorn;Thomas Lengauer

  • Sequence variants in IL10, ARPC2 and multiple other loci contribute to ulcerative colitis susceptibility

    Andre Franke;Tobias Balschun;Tom H Karlsen;Jurgita Sventoraityte

  • Genetic variation in DLG5 is associated with inflammatory bowel disease

    Monika Stoll;Brit Corneliussen;Christine M Costello;Georg H Waetzig

  • Recruitment and activation of a lipid kinase by hepatitis C virus NS5A is essential for integrity of the membranous replication compartment

    Simon Reiss;Ilka Rebhan;Perdita Backes;Ines Romero-Brey

  • Sarcoidosis is associated with a truncating splice site mutation in BTNL2.

    Ruta Valentonyte;Jochen Hampe;Klaus Huse;Philip Rosenstiel

  • Topological analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures

    Nadezhda Tsankova Doncheva;Yassen Assenov;Francisco S. Domingues;Mario Albrecht

  • Resistance proteins: molecular switches of plant defence.

    Frank L. W. Takken;Mario Albrecht;Wladimir I. L. Tameling

  • Structure–function analysis of the NB-ARC domain of plant disease resistance proteins

    Gerben van Ooijen;Gabriele Mayr;Mobien M. A. Kasiem;Mario Albrecht

  • Genome-wide association study identifies a psoriasis susceptibility locus at TRAF3IP2

    Eva Ellinghaus;David Ellinghaus;Philip E Stuart;Rajan P Nair

  • Dense genotyping of immune-related disease regions identifies nine new risk loci for primary sclerosing cholangitis

    Jimmy Z Liu;Johannes Roksund Hov;Trine Folseraas;Trine Folseraas;Eva Ellinghaus

  • AltAnalyze and DomainGraph: analyzing and visualizing exon expression data

    Dorothea Emig;Nathan Salomonis;Jan Baumbach;Thomas Lengauer

  • Mutations in the NB-ARC domain of I-2 that impair ATP hydrolysis cause autoactivation.

    Wladimir I.L. Tameling;Jack H. Vossen;Mario Albrecht;Thomas Lengauer

  • Genetics of Crohn disease, an archetypal inflammatory barrier disease

    Stefan Schreiber;Philip Rosenstiel;Mario Albrecht;Jochen Hampe

  • PSICQUIC and PSISCORE: accessing and scoring molecular interactions

    Bruno Aranda;Hagen Blankenburg;Samuel Kerrien;Fiona S L Brinkman

  • Analyzing and visualizing residue networks of protein structures.

    Nadezhda Tsankova Doncheva;Karsten Klein;Francisco S Domingues;Mario Albrecht

  • Variants in a Novel Epidermal Collagen Gene (COL29A1) Are Associated with Atopic Dermatitis

    Cilla Söderhäll;Ingo Marenholz;Ingo Marenholz;Tamara Kerscher;Tamara Kerscher;Franz Rüschendorf

  • The implications of alternative splicing in the ENCODE protein complement

    Michael L. Tress;Pier Luigi Martelli;Adam Frankish;Gabrielle A. Reeves

  • Dissection of the inflammatory bowel disease transcriptome using genome-wide cDNA microarrays.

    Christine M Costello;Nancy Mah;Robert Häsler;Philip Rosenstiel

  • Dissection of the inflammatory bowel disease transcriptome using genome-wide cDNA microarrays identifies novel candidate disease genes

    Christine M. Costello;Nancy Mah;Robert Häsler;Philip Rosenstiel

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Lengauer
Thomas Lengauer Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Stefan Schreiber
Stefan Schreiber Kiel University
Andre Franke
Andre Franke Kiel University
Philip Rosenstiel
Philip Rosenstiel Kiel University
Michael Krawczak
Michael Krawczak Kiel University
Tom H. Karlsen
Tom H. Karlsen Oslo University Hospital
Jochen Hampe
Jochen Hampe TU Dresden
Morten H. Vatn
Morten H. Vatn University of Oslo
David Ellinghaus
David Ellinghaus Kiel University
Christopher G. Mathew
Christopher G. Mathew King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways in the biomedical and healthcare fields. If you are interested in administrative roles, consider medical billing and coding programs. These programs can be completed online, offering a flexible entry point into healthcare careers that complement genetics research and clinical work.

For students seeking to accelerate their education, fast track college degree options are available in allied health, science, and related fields. These condensed programs allow motivated learners to finish their degrees more quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Many learners prefer the flexibility of studying at their own pace. Numerous self paced university programs let you balance your studies with work or other commitments, making advanced education in genetics or life sciences more accessible than ever.

When considering your options, look for colleges with no application fee to minimize upfront costs. This can make the process of applying to online genetics programs or related degrees more affordable and less stressful.

Best Scientists Citing Mario Albrecht

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles