World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 58 3347 3201 15 15 149 8073

Marcos L.S. Oliveira publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcos L.S. Oliveira between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcos L.S. Oliveira published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2021. 47 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2021. 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 4 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 26 publications
2009 2025

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcos L.S. Oliveira: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 4
2010 4
2011 11
2012 3
2013 11
2014 6
2015 4
2016 13
2017 1
2018 4
2019 17
2020 31
2021 34
2022 24
2023 21
2024 21
2025 26
Total 235
Download as CSV

Marcos L.S. Oliveira publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos L.S. Oliveira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 149
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcos L.S. Oliveira D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos L.S. Oliveira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166 58
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcos L.S. Oliveira is affiliated with the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina in Brazil. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with a notable emphasis on water science and technology, pollution, geochemistry and petrology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, and biomedical engineering.

Their scientific contributions include work on the adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal, heavy metals in the environment, coal and its by-products, air quality and health impacts, geochemistry and elemental analysis, extraction and separation processes, and clay minerals and soil interactions.

Frequent publication venues for Marcos L.S. Oliveira include:

  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Geoscience Frontiers
  • Chemosphere
  • Journal of environmental chemical engineering
  • Sustainability

Frequent coauthors associated with Oliveira's research are:

  • Luís F.O. Silva
  • Guilherme Luiz Dotto
  • Alcindo Neckel
  • Brian William Bodah
  • Laércio Stolfo Maculan

Recent papers include:

  • Adsorption of congo red and methylene blue dyes on an ashitaba waste and a walnut shell-based activated carbon from aqueous solutions: Experiments, characterization and physical interpretations (2020, Chemical Engineering Journal)
  • A review on the environmental impact of phosphogypsum and potential health impacts through the release of nanoparticles (2021, Chemosphere)
  • Possibilities of using silicate rock powder: An overview (2021, Geoscience Frontiers)
  • Treatment of effluents containing 2-chlorophenol by adsorption onto chemically and physically activated biochars (2020, Journal of environmental chemical engineering)
  • Highly effective adsorption of synthetic phenol effluent by a novel activated carbon prepared from fruit wastes of the Ceiba speciosa forest species (2021, Journal of environmental chemical engineering)

Best Publications

  • Adsorption of congo red and methylene blue dyes on an ashitaba waste and a walnut shell-based activated carbon from aqueous solutions: Experiments, characterization and physical interpretations

    Zichao Li;Hassan Hanafy;Hassan Hanafy;Lei Zhang;Lotfi Sellaoui

  • A review on the environmental impact of phosphogypsum and potential health impacts through the release of nanoparticles.

    Luis F.O. Silva;Marcos L.S. Oliveira;Tito J. Crissien;M. Santosh

  • Chemical composition and minerals in pyrite ash of an abandoned sulphuric acid production plant.

    Marcos L.S. Oliveira;Colin R. Ward;Maria Izquierdo;Carlos H. Sampaio

  • Adsorption of dyes brilliant blue, sunset yellow and tartrazine from aqueous solution on chitosan: Analytical interpretation via multilayer statistical physics model

    Lei Zhang;Lotfi Sellaoui;Dison Franco;Guilherme Luiz Dotto

  • Study of environmental pollution and mineralogical characterization of sediment rivers from Brazilian coal mining acid drainage.

    Luis F.O. Silva;Silvia Fdez Ortiz de Vallejuelo;Irantzu Martinez-Arkarazo;Kepa Castro

  • A preliminary study of coal mining drainage and environmental health in the Santa Catarina region, Brazil

    Luis F. O. Silva;Marcus Wollenschlager;Marcos L. S. Oliveira

  • Mineralogy and leaching characteristics of beneficiated coal products from Santa Catarina, Brazil

    Marcos L.S. Oliveira;Colin R. Ward;David French;James C. Hower

  • A preliminary evaluation of volcanic rock powder for application in agriculture as soil a remineralizer.

    Claudete G. Ramos;Xavier Querol;Marcos Leandro Silva Oliveira;Karen Pires

  • A mineralogical and geochemical study of three Brazilian coal cleaning rejects: Demonstration of electron beam applications

    César M.N.L. Cutruneo;Marcos L.S. Oliveira;Colin R. Ward;James C. Hower

  • Gaseous emissions and sublimates from the Truman Shepherd coal fire, Floyd County, Kentucky: A re-investigation following attempted mitigation of the fire

    James C. Hower;Jennifer M.K. O'Keefe;Kevin R. Henke;Nicola J. Wagner

  • Direct identification of hazardous elements in ultra-fine and nanominerals from coal fly ash produced during diesel co-firing.

    Kátia Martinello;Marcos L.S. Oliveira;Fernando A. Molossi;Claudete G. Ramos

  • Leaching of potential hazardous elements of coal cleaning rejects.

    Luis F. O. Silva;Maria Izquierdo;Xavier Querol;Robert B. Finkelman

  • Nanoparticles from construction wastes: A problem to health and the environment

    Marcos L.S. Oliveira;Maria Izquierdo;Xavier Querol;Roy N. Lieberman

  • Nanominerals and ultrafine particles from coal fires from Santa Catarina, South Brazil

    Camila L. Dias;Marcos L.S. Oliveira;James C. Hower;Silvio R. Taffarel

  • Leaching of rare earth elements from phosphogypsum.

    Unknown

  • Geochemistry and nano-mineralogy of two medium-sulfur northeast Indian coals

    Binoy K. Saikia;Colin R. Ward;Marcos L.S. Oliveira;James C. Hower

  • Geochemistry and nano-mineralogy of feed coals, mine overburden, and coal-derived fly ashes from Assam (North-east India): a multi-faceted analytical approach

    Binoy K. Saikia;Colin R. Ward;Marcos L.S. Oliveira;James C. Hower

  • Nanominerals and ultrafine particles in sublimates from the Ruth Mullins coal fire, Perry County, Eastern Kentucky, USA

    Luis F.O. Silva;Marcos L.S. Oliveira;Erika R. Neace;Jennifer M.K. O'Keefe

  • Observations and Assessment of Fly Ashes from High-Sulfur Bituminous Coals and Blends of High-Sulfur Bituminous and Subbituminous Coals: Environmental Processes Recorded at the Macro- and Nanometer Scale

    Jennifer Wilcox;Beibei Wang;Erik Rupp;Ross Taggart

  • Characterization of Santa Catarina (Brazil) coal with respect to human health and environmental concerns.

    L. F. O. Silva;M. L. S. Oliveira;K. M. da Boit;R. B. Finkelman;R. B. Finkelman

  • Fate of hazardous elements in agricultural soils surrounding a coal power plant complex from Santa Catarina (Brazil)

    Azibar Rodriguez-Iruretagoiena;Silvia Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo;Ainara Gredilla;Claudete G. Ramos

Frequent Co-Authors

Luis F.O. Silva
Luis F.O. Silva University of Lima
Guilherme Luiz Dotto
Guilherme Luiz Dotto Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
James C. Hower
James C. Hower University of Kentucky
Xavier Querol
Xavier Querol Spanish National Research Council
Colin R. Ward
Colin R. Ward University of New South Wales
M. Santosh
M. Santosh China University of Geosciences
Maria Izquierdo
Maria Izquierdo Spanish National Research Council
Robert B. Finkelman
Robert B. Finkelman The University of Texas at Dallas
Eder C. Lima
Eder C. Lima Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Juan Manuel Madariaga
Juan Manuel Madariaga University of the Basque Country

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, branching into related fields through online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. For instance, a Master of Public Administration can enhance skills in policy-making and environmental governance. Many opt for a 1 year mpa online program to quickly gain these valuable competencies.

Understanding the social dimensions of environmental issues is also crucial. Pursuing one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs helps develop insights into community behavior and social justice, which are integral to sustainability efforts.

For educators or professionals seeking advanced degrees without the time-intensive dissertation, exploring an online edd no dissertation option can facilitate continued learning while balancing career commitments.

Additionally, transitioning from an EdS to doctorate-level expertise is possible through flexible eds to edd programs online, allowing for professional growth in educational leadership with convenience.

Best Scientists Citing Marcos L.S. Oliveira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles