World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6744
World Ranking
11993
National Ranking
4898

Marcia L. Peters publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia L. Peters sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 62 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marcia L. Peters D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia L. Peters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcia L. Peters is affiliated with IBM in the United States, where they conduct their research and professional activities. Their profile indicates involvement primarily in the technological and corporate research environment typical of IBM.

There are no records of published research papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Marcia L. Peters in the available data. Similarly, there is no information on book publications, fields of study, subfields, or specific topics of work connected to Peters.

No awards or honors have been documented for Marcia L. Peters in the supplied information.

Based on the data, Marcia L. Peters currently appears to be an active researcher or professional without publicly accessible publication history or extensive academic collaborations. This lack of publication data might indicate a focus on proprietary research or industry-focused activities at IBM rather than academic dissemination.

Best Publications

  • Methods, systems and computer program products for secure firmware updates

    John R. Hind;Marcia Lambert Peters

  • Method and apparatus for exclusively pairing wireless devices

    John Raithel Hind;Marcia Lambert Peters

  • Methods, systems and computer program products for detecting a spoofed source address in IP datagrams

    Ronald P. Doyle;John R. Hind;Thomas Narten;Marcia L. Peters

  • Secure integrated device with secure, dynamically-selectable capabilities

    Ronald P. Doyle;John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters

  • Smart card with integrated biometric sensor

    Ronald Doyle;John Hind;Marcia Peters

  • Selective data encryption using style sheet processing

    Mark C. Davis;John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters;Brad B. Topol

  • Technique for continuous user authentication

    Ronald Doyle;John Hind;Marcia Peters

  • Multicast communication tree creation and control method and apparatus

    Joshua Seth Auerbach;Chee-Seng Chow;John Ellis Drake;Prabandham Madan Gopal

  • Method and system for providing targeted advertising and personalized customer services

    John Hind;James Mathewson;Marcia Peters

  • Using device certificates for automated authentication of communicating devices

    John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters

  • Using device certificates to authenticate servers before automatic address assignment

    John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters

  • Identification and tracking of persons using RFID-tagged items in store environments

    John R. Hind;M. Mathewson Ii James;Marcia L. Peters

  • Clickstream data collection technique

    John R. Hind;Binh Q. Nguyen;Marcia L. Peters

  • Method and apparatus for efficiently initializing secure communications among wireless devices

    John Raithel Hind;Marcia Lambert Peters

  • Selective data encryption using style sheet processing for decryption by a client proxy

    John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters;Brad B. Topol

  • Method to address security and privacy issues of the use of RFID systems to track consumer products

    John R. Hind;II James M. Mathewson;Marcia L. Peters

  • Method and system for providing targeted advertising in public places and carriers

    Marcia L. Peters;II James M. Mathewson;John R. Hind

  • Address resolution in ad-hoc networking

    Marcia L. Peters

  • Quality of service improvements for network transactions

    Roberto DeLima;John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters

  • Method and apparatus for efficiently initializing mobile wireless devices

    John Raithel Hind;Marcia Lambert Peters

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Hind
John R. Hind IBM (United States)
Shay Kutten
Shay Kutten Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Ronald P. Doyle
Ronald P. Doyle Broadcom (United States)
Roch Guerin
Roch Guerin Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens many avenues for specialization and career growth. Students seeking to expand their skill sets can consider a diverse range of options, including graduate programs and industry certifications.

For those intrigued by engineering, pursuing an online master’s in electrical engineering degree is a popular route that builds on core computing principles and offers strong career prospects in technology and innovation.

If you’re eager to accelerate your qualifications, there are quick certifications that pay well, as well as the shortest masters degree programs online. These flexible pathways allow you to upskill and enter new roles rapidly within the tech sector.

Looking to maximize your investment in education? Explore some of the most useful graduate degrees that are currently in high demand. Selecting the right program or certification can set you apart and prepare you for leadership roles in this competitive field.

Best Scientists Citing Marcia L. Peters

Recently Published Articles